• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a great success" Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Evacuation was a great success" I would say that "success" means doing something according to the plan so it means that did evacuation work as it supposed to? A historian would argue about being "success" by looking at the good points and bad points. So did evacuation save lives? Evacuation started on 31st August 1939. At this time the government controlled all the aspects of media wanted to give the public the impression that evacuation was popular among those affected and put out propaganda pictures and film to this effect,. At this time the government media was all biased and they wanted to persuade mothers to evacuate their children for there safety. Some parents had realised that they could not put their children in danger and some did not realise that it was serious. In source A it shows a photograph of hundreds of children being evacuated and going towards the station. The aim for the source was to show that everything was working well and the way they planned it. I would say that the source is biased because you can see that it shows children was calm, which was untrue they were very worried and scared. ...read more.

Middle

I would say that the information is made up because these sorts of things did not happen. I would say that the source could be called a tertiary because the writer did not write about experience evacuation and it has been taken more then 30 years after which is likely that children would not remember. The aim of the source is to show children how it was experienced and the way they would be treated. In the source you can see that the children "giggled" which shows that it was fun and exciting for them. The source talks about the children being poor and they could not afford slippers, and she talks about no space in the suitcase for children to bring slippers with them. Source C could be used to show how people were living in towns and also most people were poor. A lot of hosts realised how the living conditions were and the way people were treated. Looking at source D it shows the government's persuasive poster to encourage people to look after children. Evidence such as ""you will be doing a real service for the nation". It shows that the government used such language to persuade people to look after the children. ...read more.

Conclusion

Most evacuees were school children. A lot of school children did not want to get evacuated mostly because leaving their parents. I would say that evacuation was very successful because it saved many lives. It would be wrong to go against the government because it was an emergency and no one else had a better plan that that. If the government had done nothing millions of people would have died. So I would say evacuation was better than nothing. This would have lead to a low moral and Britain would have lost the war. In September 1939 I million coffins were ordered to London. Luckily the British professional was wrong. The German air raids were not that powerful as the British had expected. 60 thousand civilians died in the air raids, which show that it did affect the British a lot. Overall I would say that evacuation changed the living conditions and also, lives. Some people thought it was going to be fun and some thought it was hard and powerful. In one way if there were no evacuation a lot of innocent people would have died, so I think that evacuation was a good plan for an emergency attack by the Germans, which was very likely. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 By HABIB AKKURT 11R ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    Many children gained a lot of new experiences and there were many long-term benefits. Some long-term benefits include broadened horizons of the children, increased understanding between classes and a raised awareness of urban poverty. Many country dwellers did not know how city children lived and evacuation was an opportunity for them to find out.

  2. Was Evacuation A Success

    The poster was issued by the government in 1940 and its aim was to appeal for more people to provide homes for evacuee children. Obviously, not enough people had volunteered to foster and they were still looking for more people.

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    Source D is showing how better off the evacuees are if they are evacuated to the countryside whereas source E is describing how better off the children are if they stay in the cities. The sources are also different as in source D the government is saying how grateful parents

  2. Evacuation was a great success

    Therefore, for this reason, the Source is unreliable, however, because the author was an ex-evacuee, the novel is likely to be based on her own experiences and therefore some themes might have useful information. The book was produced for the general public and its aim was to excite the reader,

  1. Was Evacuation a success?

    Also, during World War 2 three million individuals were evacuated and this picture only shows around 50 people, thus only showing a small minority of views and not the opinion of the whole country. This also brings into question the time the photograph was taken; it was at the early

  2. Was Evacuation a success?

    were safe and happy and they would only have to lie if they had something to hide. Source C also shows us that evacuation was moderately successful as well as having some bad points. Source C is an interview with a teacher which took place in 1988.

  1. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    The first round of evacuation took place between the dates of 1st - 3rd September. This signifies just how incomprehensive the book actually is. Alternatively, it seems that the process of walking to the train station, where they would board their trains - destination: somewhere in the rolling hills of the countryside, was fairly organised.

  2. The 1939 evacuation of London was well organised. Discuss.

    told to be ready the third time she just put a few clothes in the case?we went with half the things we needed??. This is a first-hand account but it was recalled many years later so her memory could have been distorted.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work