• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? The evacuation of children in Britain was a large-scale operation, and I think that the government planned it well, and therefore it was a success. The government evacuated 3million people in the first weekend of the war. This number was a mixture of mothers with young children, pregnant women, and children. It is estimated that if the government did not use evacuation, then there would have been 4million casualties. In the First World War, there was no need to evacuate, as planes were made of wood, they had a limited range, and limited payloads. By the Second World War, there were technological advances, long-range bombers had been developed and there were increased payloads. Because of these factors, most urban centres in Britain were at risk. The government thought of these factors, and they therefore believed that evacuation was a key way of protecting the Britain and the citizens. Organising the evacuation was a hard task, but the government managed to organise the evacuation of children efficiently and well. ...read more.

Middle

This would be very harsh on the children involved, as some would have to have the humiliation of being the last chosen from all of their friends, this would be a bad start for the experience, as the children would know that they were not wanted and the parents were not happy in having the rejects of the rest of the crowd. Sources G and E show us how children were treated as if they were poor. In source E, a foster parent says how the children 'urinated on the walls'. Most of the children evacuated were poor, and did not have many manners. People accepting children saw of all the children in this way, but there were some upper class children evacuated as well. The stereotype of the evacuees was of a scruffy, dirty boy from London's East End. In source G the receiving aren't says, 'why should you have slippers?' Here the parent is believing in the agreed stereotype, and also mistreating the children. Source F shows us how some of the children were higher in class than where they were evacuated. ...read more.

Conclusion

People did not evacuate again after returning home, because they were accustomed to the conditions of bombing. There were problems with evacuation. Parents used to mistreat and abuse children, and the children would therefore not enjoy the experience. It was hard for foster parents to look after another child. The government did not sponsor children, so the money had to come out of the receiving family's wage. Eventually centres were set up so that evacuees could meet up, wash their clothes, bathe and other things away from their foster homes. This took some pressure off of the receiving families. Source D shows the evacuees in one of the centres, but as the government issued this photo, it is probable that it could not be reliable. The government would have issued this photograph to stop rumours spreading that people were not enjoying evacuation. There is no doubt that evacuation was a success at what it was trying to achieve, which was to save lives. It did this due to the government's efficiency in organising evacuation. There were some failures, but these only occurred in areas where the evacuation was not organised well. Overall, evacuation was a success. Word Count = 1052 Words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    Thousands of evacuees caused an invasion of the country. Some people were made homeless in the country because they would rather move out of their homes than take in evacuees. It was a partial failure for the government because the government propaganda caused near panic rather than controlled movement.

  2. Was Evacuation A Success

    Source F is a letter written by a young girl during her time in evacuation. It is very useful because it is taken from the time in the year 1939. She writes to her family about her life being an evacuee living with another family.

  1. Evacuation was a great success

    This Source was produced in 1940, after the war had started which means that possibly many potential foster parents did not believe that there help was needed, however, the German bombing raids began a few months later. The Source shows that more foster parents were needed and that they would be hugely appreciated.

  2. Was Evacuation a success?

    This often resulted in evacuees from poor families being looked after far better than they would have been at home; this is considered a success of evacuation. Also, the foster parent in the story was prepared to take in children despite being single and provided a good foster home to the evacuees.

  1. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

    This is shown when the teacher in the interview describes the fact that, during the evacuation, as they got to the station, the train was ready for them, this portrays evacuation as being successful because it was well organised. However, there is much more in the source to show that

  2. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

    From this quote, we can tell that the children are being well looked after. Evacuees were typically stereotyped as dirty, ill-mannered children coming from slums, which may well have dampened their spirits. Often the evacuees were misjudged, and many were the complete opposite to the stereotyped evacuee.

  1. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    The source shows a varied opinion because the father says some villagers considered sending their children and then changed their mind. Many families did not want to send their children to an unknown family in an unknown destination. Having said that Source I only shows one point of view out

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree with this interpretation?

    Many of the children's first reactions to the policy of evacuation were frightful and to others it was first thought as a holiday for themselves. Some did not know what was going on, as they were too young to understand.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work