• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

3) "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies. Evacuation was what took place in order to prevent people being killed or injured due to the heavy bombing of major cities during the war. 1,474,000 schoolchildren, mothers and children, handicapped people, teachers and pregnant women were moved from areas prone to bombing to countryside areas by the government. 2 million people were also evacuated privately, staying with friends and relatives away from the cities in 1939. The first evacuation was brought into effect on 1st September, though this was done in vain due to the 'phoney war' and many people returned home. When the Blitz began in 1940, they were re-evacuated, and again in 1944 when the V1 and V2 rockets were sent over. Many different groups of people had different aims and ideas for evacuation. The government brought evacuation into effect with the aim of moving as many people and saving as many lives as possible. They used methods of propaganda to encourage parents to evacuate their children. ...read more.

Middle

The parents' aim for evacuation was to ensure their children's safety. Source D would have reassured parents as it shows the evacuees safe from harm. The hosts of the children all had different aims for evacuation; some wanted companionship, others wanted a slave. A lot of the host families did a fantastic job looking after the evacuees as shown in Source H, a poster advertising hosting to Scottish families: "Some kindly folk have been looking after children from the cities for over six months. Extra work? Yes, they've been a handful! But the foster parents know they've done the right thing." But many families did not look after their evacuees so well, and used them to do all their work. This is shown in the following source, in which a 13 year-old middle-class boy compares evacuation with his home life: "After school we were expected to sweep out Mr Benson's butcher's shop and scrub down the marble slabs... I had never been asked to help my father in his bank." There are many factors that made evacuation a success. Source G portrays evacuation as a positive thing. ...read more.

Conclusion

The quotes tell us evacuation is not working, because if it were completely successful, everyone would be sending their children away. The father refuses to send his son to strangers, and as many parents insisted on keeping their children in London, others must have felt the same way. Source C is a source from a teacher who was evacuated with children from her school: "All you could hear was the feet of the children and a kind of murmur, because the children were too afraid to talk." "...We hadn't the slightest idea where we were going." Which shows how some evacuations were not well organised. In conclusion, I think evacuation was generally a success. Many lives were saved because of it, and many evacuees had great experiences. Though, there were many failures of the system as well. During the war, 43000 people died in the bombing and many of them were children. However, many more children would have died had evacuation not taken place. Evacuation also had many successful after-effects. After seeing the state of some city children, it brought their living conditions to the attention of others. Following the war, a new Labour government was elected, who created a 'welfare state', which featured services for health and poverty. This helped make Britain a much more equal place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    This proves the government did not stick to their original plans. The government failed to realise the effect evacuation would have on their children; a child learns an incredibly large amount in their first five years. Taking a child away from its mother is a very traumatic experience.

  2. Was Evacuation A Success

    This suggests she is being well looked after with fine clothes to wear. She also comments on the fact that she was not short of money; 'You need not send me a post order because I am not short of money.'

  1. History Revision for year 11. The Liberal Reforms, the Beveridge Reforms and the ...

    the Winston Churchill, the leader of the Conservative Party said he would not. This made many people vote Labour. The Labour Government, which was elected in July 1945, immediately began to plan the Welfare State. The first part of the Welfare State was the Family Allowances Act in 1945.

  2. WW2 Evacuations

    But not all endured bad treatment. Source E is a negative piece of evidence; it is describing a mother who looks back on looking after children and their mother. The source says that "the children went around the house urinating on the walls" this statement automatically shows the poor conditions that children living in major cities

  1. Evacuation was a great success. Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation explain ...

    Source E is an extract from the observer involving a father being asked about the evacuation of his son. I consider this source to be reliable as it is an extract from an official document. The interview was conducted in 1940 which was during the war period and reflected the

  2. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    The fact that some children go left behind shows that it was not as well organised as it could have been. Pre-set places should have been set up to avoid the handpicking of children which shows favouritism towards some children.

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree with this interpretation?

    Source D is a photograph of evacuees having a bath. It shows them all to be very happy and is a very positive picture towards evacuation as the children are having a good bath and a good time. It is a useful source as it is a photograph and so

  2. 'Evacuation was a great success' Do you agree?

    Firstly and quite majorly was the unhappiness felt by kids and their parents when being evacuated, parents and children often found it very hard to separate and were usually not allowed to give their children a proper send off. Examples of unhappy kids and parents can be seen in sources F, E and B.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work