• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

3) "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies. Evacuation was what took place in order to prevent people being killed or injured due to the heavy bombing of major cities during the war. 1,474,000 schoolchildren, mothers and children, handicapped people, teachers and pregnant women were moved from areas prone to bombing to countryside areas by the government. 2 million people were also evacuated privately, staying with friends and relatives away from the cities in 1939. The first evacuation was brought into effect on 1st September, though this was done in vain due to the 'phoney war' and many people returned home. When the Blitz began in 1940, they were re-evacuated, and again in 1944 when the V1 and V2 rockets were sent over. Many different groups of people had different aims and ideas for evacuation. The government brought evacuation into effect with the aim of moving as many people and saving as many lives as possible. They used methods of propaganda to encourage parents to evacuate their children. ...read more.

Middle

The parents' aim for evacuation was to ensure their children's safety. Source D would have reassured parents as it shows the evacuees safe from harm. The hosts of the children all had different aims for evacuation; some wanted companionship, others wanted a slave. A lot of the host families did a fantastic job looking after the evacuees as shown in Source H, a poster advertising hosting to Scottish families: "Some kindly folk have been looking after children from the cities for over six months. Extra work? Yes, they've been a handful! But the foster parents know they've done the right thing." But many families did not look after their evacuees so well, and used them to do all their work. This is shown in the following source, in which a 13 year-old middle-class boy compares evacuation with his home life: "After school we were expected to sweep out Mr Benson's butcher's shop and scrub down the marble slabs... I had never been asked to help my father in his bank." There are many factors that made evacuation a success. Source G portrays evacuation as a positive thing. ...read more.

Conclusion

The quotes tell us evacuation is not working, because if it were completely successful, everyone would be sending their children away. The father refuses to send his son to strangers, and as many parents insisted on keeping their children in London, others must have felt the same way. Source C is a source from a teacher who was evacuated with children from her school: "All you could hear was the feet of the children and a kind of murmur, because the children were too afraid to talk." "...We hadn't the slightest idea where we were going." Which shows how some evacuations were not well organised. In conclusion, I think evacuation was generally a success. Many lives were saved because of it, and many evacuees had great experiences. Though, there were many failures of the system as well. During the war, 43000 people died in the bombing and many of them were children. However, many more children would have died had evacuation not taken place. Evacuation also had many successful after-effects. After seeing the state of some city children, it brought their living conditions to the attention of others. Following the war, a new Labour government was elected, who created a 'welfare state', which featured services for health and poverty. This helped make Britain a much more equal place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Free essay

    Assignment 2, Question 3 Evacuation was a success do you agree with this ...

    used to higher class backgrounds in the urban parts of Britain, this source is reliable as it comes from a first hand experience, however it this is only a few cases some evacuees were treated fairly and of a higher class than they are used to.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    This proves the government did not stick to their original plans. The government failed to realise the effect evacuation would have on their children; a child learns an incredibly large amount in their first five years. Taking a child away from its mother is a very traumatic experience.

  1. History Revision for year 11. The Liberal Reforms, the Beveridge Reforms and the ...

    Rationing had shown that government intervention could be effective. Beforehand some politicians had stated that it was impossible to improve the health of the nation; rationing changed it almost overnight. In addition the government provided dietary supplements for the first time, such as orange juice and cod liver oil.

  2. Do you agree with Smiths(TM)s interpretation of the effects of the opening of the ...

    building of the railway which was currently being built and this may suggest that the author new some background information on the town. The extract basically says that things in Selby are getting better, the town is wealthy, it Is currently investing in and building a new railway and that

  1. Evacuation was a great success. Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation explain ...

    Overall this shows the failures of evacuation as there were not enough families volunteering to provide homes and people had to be forced to take children - this may have resulted in poor care for evacuated children as they were unwanted in many homes.

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    Also I think the man being interviewed in source E might have been quite emotional or wound up about the subject of evacuation making his answers more definite and one sided. However, source E is also different from source B as it was written at the time of the war,

  1. Was Evacuation a success?

    successes of evacuation so far and using children who received a good foster home to show their appreciation; emotional blackmail. This makes this source propaganda, published by the government, meaning that the information contained in it is valid but is highlighted to make you more emotional about it and feel the need to become a foster parent.

  2. Was Evacuation a success?

    The interview was taken almost 50 years after the evacuation; hence some would say that the source is slightly unreliable as it is hard for someone to recall incidents that took place 50 years ago. However, the time gap could be a positive aspect as it gives a person plenty of time to make a fair judgement.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work