• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Evacuation was a great success.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from you own studies.

Extracts from this document...


'Evacuation was a great success.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from you own studies. Throughout Britain in September 1939 scenes of mass evacuation took place, women and children from major cities were transported then relocated in the rural countryside. Evacuation was a precaution taken by the government to reduce the casualties from heavy bombing; targeted at large civilian places. It was known as Operation 'Pied Piper' whose principal aim was to keep children safe from the dangers of the Second World War. Evacuation was a success in that respect, as many children were sent to an environment which reduced the risk of bombing compared to staying at home. However, this was only one of the main aims of evacuation. This essay is to assess whether or not the aims of evacuation were accomplished and the benefits and down-sides that followed. Evacuation saved millions of lives in London alone. Conservative estimates put civilian casualties in London at 4 million, and the government ordered hospitals to prepare for the worst and stockpile coffins. It was against this backdrop that mass evacuation took place. Nevertheless, evacuation did save many lives across Britain and for that reason it must have been a great success. Yet, there were many errors that disrupted evacuation such as the misconceptions about evacuees as told in source F. ...read more.


This is shown by source D, a photograph issued by the government to show evacuation was currently doing well. In September 1939, 1.5 million children were evacuated. Homesickness and the realisation that the war had not begun saw many children drift back to their homes in the cities towards the end of 1939; this period was known as the Phoney War. When German bombers started blitzing Britain's cities in 1940 a second evacuation took place, though not on the scale of the one in 1939. A few thousand children were also sent overseas to commonwealth countries such as Australia and South Africa. This shows that the evacuation process also had its downsides - some evacuees got homesick, many country families were shocked in how city slum people lived, others were resented as a burden by their foster families. During the evacuation, many children suffered the trauma of separation and isolation and were terrified by the prospect of being removed from their parents. For the most part, mothers were not evacuated with their children, unless they were pregnant. Instead, over 100,000 teachers escorted the children out of the cities. It was a time of worry and anxiety for parents. For children there were emotions ranging from fear and excitement to uncertainty, while some young evacuees struggled to understand why many of their mothers stood by crying. It was only a few days in till the evacuees were hit with homesickness. ...read more.


This tells us that though 20,000 people had volunteered, others were very reluctant to take evacuees in. Overall, it is difficult to conclude whether evacuation was a success or a failure. People have various opinions based on their own experiences; therefore you can not really draw a firm conclusion from that. Many evacuees had great experiences though it depended on the attitudes of the specific people involved. However, there were many failures of the system as well. During the war, 43,000 people died in the bombing and many of them were children. Still, many more children would have died had evacuation not taken place. The government had little control over evacuation. In source C, a recollection of a teacher, "We hadn't the slightest idea where we were going." shows how some evacuations were not well organised. Evacuation also had many successful long term effects. After seeing the state of some city children, it brought their living conditions to the attention of others. Following the war, a new Labour government was elected, who created a 'welfare state', which featured services for health and poverty. This helped make Britain a much more equal place. In my own personal opinion, every life that was saved due to evacuation means that it was success. Thus, I agree with the statement taking into account how it affected people's lives. Many aims of evacuation were fulfilled; both short and long term events ameliorated Britain after the War. Some people did not enjoy evacuation, but without it they might not have lived to tell us that. ?? ?? ?? ?? Gary Chew ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    According to official figures by the 8th January 1940 almost 900,000 of the evacuees had gone home, despite campaigns to stop this. The fact that evacuation was a failure from the parents point of view is also suggested in source I.

  2. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    Source C is a teacher recalling being evacuated with children from her school its taken from an interview in 1988. This teacher's recollections are that all children were afraid, so this is a point that evacuation was not successful and the children did not want to go.

  1. Was Evacuation A Success

    The poster was issued by the government in 1940 and its aim was to appeal for more people to provide homes for evacuee children. Obviously, not enough people had volunteered to foster and they were still looking for more people.

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    Source B and C also have different attitudes to evacuation. Source B shows a very negative view whereas source C shows a more positive view. I think that the attitudes in these two sources differ because the author of source C is trying to show mainly positive aspects of evacuation

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Discuss

    This proved to people that they managed to be successful and also they thought than evacuating some children was better than doing nothing. The most important reason why evacuation was not successful was because air raids had lasted until 10th May 1941 which nearly 60,000 civilians were killed.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree with this interpretation?

    Although it does suggest that the organization was good, it also supports that the children did not know where they were going, or why they were being separated from there family. This could have led to the morale of the families falling as they were split up.

  1. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    It was just the incompetence of the problematic billeting officers that failed an otherwise successful aspect of evacuation. When evacuation took place, it was quite obvious that the children would need a place to go, and one would think that the authorities would have had the sense to match the appropriate classes with each other.

  2. Was Evacuation a success?

    Also, during World War 2 three million individuals were evacuated and this picture only shows around 50 people, thus only showing a small minority of views and not the opinion of the whole country. This also brings into question the time the photograph was taken; it was at the early

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work