• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evacuation was a great success' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your own research.

Extracts from this document...


'Evacuation was a great success' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your own research. The aims of evacuation were to save as many lives as possible and to keep the war effort going under the air raids. But to what extent did it achieve these aims? I will investigate the processes many successes and failures and come to an over all conclusion as to the success or failure of evacuation. The evacuation process had many successes such as how organised and well implemented it was. A video I viewed called 'the evacuees' by Jack Rosentha showed children practicing before the event showing they where well prepared. There are limitations and doubts to this source as it is fiction and may be showing a false image of evacuation. But the video was made by a real evacuee and I see no bias, but to see if the video portrayed an accurate image of how organised evacuation was I would need to cross reference it will a reliable source. ...read more.


Also through the process of evacuation many new families where formed, many kids benefited from a change in surroundings: "We where treated like royal princesses...happy memories." 2* The above quote from source F showed many children where happy there and enjoyed there time. The source is from an eye witness account and has no bias aims: "...children who remained fitted in well and both they and the local children benefited from the experience." 3* Another source showing a positive view on evacuation was source D. This showed that all the children evacuated before when the poster was released (1940) where very happy and contented. Whilst analysing this source I noticed it is a piece of propaganda issued by the government with a bias towards evacuation. It has a clear purpose to encourage more people to foster. This is a bias source and I kept that in mind whilst viewing it. Though evacuation had many successes it also had many failures as well. ...read more.


This was a blow to the evacuation scheme and caused the end to the overseas evacuation scheme. Many evacuees tell of unhealed scars that evacuation has caused them and how traumatic it was. But many also say about how much it benefited them and how they enjoyed it. I think that evacuation was achieved its aims but caused many children trauma while doing this. It also never followed up on children to check how they where or if they where looked after properly. I think it was handled well until they reached there destination where the where left to fend for themselves. Overall I think it achieved its aim of saving many lives but was a failure for those involved. Footnotes: 1*: Doris Jackson, a real life evacuee who was evacuated from London in 1940. 2*: Evacuation: Home ground. A video where real evacuees talked about there experiences. 3*: Evacuation and Billeting 'A remarkable success' 4*: An extract from a statement from a 17 year old evacuee for the mass observation organisation. 5*: Carries War by Nina Bowden 6*: Oliver lyttelon 'Memoirs of Lord Chandos' 7*: Source E, An interview with a parent in May 1940 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Jarrow: questions 3, 4 and 5 (sources)

    valuable that you can sell and that you really need the money. The money the government given was very little and often doesn't really help the people at all. Source f is not an reliable source so therefore we can not believe everything the source tells us as it is biased.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    Some young children confused their foster parents with their real parents. During the phoney war evacuees became homesick, many had been hurriedly placed in unsuitable billets, dirty and unsanitary, or with people unwilling or unable to look after them properly.

  1. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    We were left until the very last. The room was almost empty. I sat on my rucksack and cried." A working class evacuee recalls what happened when she and her younger brother arrived in the country extracted from a History textbook.

  2. Was Evacuation A Success

    This suggests she is being well looked after with fine clothes to wear. She also comments on the fact that she was not short of money; 'You need not send me a post order because I am not short of money.'

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    but it differs from source A in that it shows the misunderstanding between children and foster parents. It is also different from source A as source A was encouraging evacuation at the time of the first evacuation whereas source C is informing people about evacuation years after it happened.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree with this interpretation?

    The source is unclear in its position towards evacuation, it talks of the prejudice against people living in the town, as many believed that all evacuees ate fish and chips out of newspaper and did not know where milk came from.

  1. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    To conclude, Source E indicates a huge failure. Similarly, but on Source E's contrary, Source F also shows social mis-matching. A secondary source, it is again an interview with a World War II evacuee, taken in 1988. It shows that it wasn't just poor, unrefined children that were evacuated.

  2. Was Evacuation a success?

    Another point to show this is when the teacher states that she didn't have the "slightest idea where they were going", once again showing no organization or reassurance to the children involved. In source B the mothers are depicted as supporting the children which was the least that they could

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work