• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies. In some ways evacuation was a success. Source B depicts a group of evacuees, who appear to be genuinely happy, as they are all smiling, whilst walking to the train station. Source B indicates that evacuation was a success, and is likely to be reliable as it was created in the era that evacuation was taking place (1939). However, the purpose of the source in question is to portray evacuation as a success, in order to encourage those living in large cities to allow their children to be evacuated. Source B may be government propaganda, and it only focuses on one scene, at one time. ...read more.

Middle

The film illustrates and focuses on the successes of evacuation, as the boy becomes closer to his host (Mr. Tom) through all his experiences. The boy's lifestyle is dramatically improved through evacuation, which is a clear success. However, the source's purpose, being a film, is to entertain, therefore may not be entirely reliable, or accurate. Other factors show evacuation to be a failure. Source A is an extract from a textbook, published for use in British schools, in 1988. It demonstrates evacuation's failures, it claims: "many evacuees could not settle in the countryside" and that "the country people were shocked at the obvious poverty and deprivation" of the evacuees that they hosted. This clearly illustrates that evacuation was, in some cases, a failure. ...read more.

Conclusion

The source is likely to be reliable, as it is an interview, meaning first hand experience. However, the interviewee may have been chosen due to their unusual experience. Source F claims that evacuees did not all hail from city slums, but it was their hosts who were living in squalor. "It is just as upsetting for a clean and well educated child to find itself in a grubby semi-slum as the other way round." The source is an interview, therefore a first hand account, but may not be entirely reliable, as it is only the opinion of an individual, and cannot be generalised. In conclusion, Evacuation was overall a success, as whatever the problems or mismatches, children were being removed from a "danger-zone", and that in many cases they gained better lifestyles through evacuation, and were removed from the poverty of the inner city slums. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    The evacuated teachers jobs were now full time. Not only did they have to teach the children as best they could, but they also had to act as surrogate parents to those who were unhappy in their new surroundings. Yet, aided by the parents and clergymen, the children's education was able to continue.

  2. 'Evacuation was a great success.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain ...

    feelings of mutual affection and eventually most evacuees were treated like members of family. These children were showered with love and affection which lasted long after the war had ended. Evacuees who came from the poorest of families might have been the ones who benefited the most from this new found friendship, all thanks to evacuation.

  1. 'Evacuation was a great success' Do you agree?

    days of evacuation, children from the cities sometimes hated the countryside folk and vice-versa, religion was also a cause for division between groups, source C is a perfect example of social division, the woman who has fostered both brother and sister asks them if they have slippers and then goes

  2. Was Evacuation A Success

    a full 99p bar today, so the chocolate bar was quite a large size which suggests that she was well fed. Then again, we need to question the source's reliability as from looking at the date, it seems to have only been written and taken at an early time of

  1. Evacuation was a great success. Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation explain ...

    However, this source could be unreliable as it is possible it is Government propaganda to try and convince parents to evacuate their children and there is a change that it could be completely staged. Another unreliable factor is that if a camera is pointed at children they will generally laugh,

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    As the book was written 34 years after evacuation took place, the author might have forgotten some details of her experience. The source is also only an extract and the rest of the story might be about negative things that happened to the characters during their evacuation.

  1. Free essay

    why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    The source's attitude towards the evacuation of children is also similar to that of Source D. Source D's attitude is positive, the source portrays two children smiling and therefore enjoying their experience of evacuation. The source is different to source B as one claims that the children were scared, but source C shows the children to have enjoyed their experience.

  2. Evacuation was a great success

    Many people often only remember the event how they want to remember it. The Source was produced for the general public to provide a factual account of evacuation, and therefore she would have no motive to falsify the evidence. The Source tells us how the country people were disgusted and appalled by the evacuee's behaviour.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work