• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Evacuation was a great success" by Jamie Clarke Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your own studies In the first world war , German air raids killed1, 1413 people. By the 1930's bombers were much bigger and British Government planners expected far greater casualties. They estimated that 600, 000 people would be killed in a few days. They also expected the use of biological weapons in the form of poison gas. From as early as 1935 plans were made to evacuate all children, pregnant mothers, mothers with young children and disabled people from the major cities of Britain, to much safer rural areas. On 1 September 1939 as war became more likely these plans were put into action. Over 4 days using buses and 4,00 special trains, 1,5million people were evacuated successfully To define evacuation to either success or failure is almost impossible. ...read more.

Middle

It is from a mother who hosted children who had been evacuated. She tells of how terrible their manners were and gives the impression of her being of a much higher social class than them. This source is showing the failure of evacuation in the minds of the host family here. Source F is another eyewitness account but this time from an evacuee. This is a turn around from Source E. The evacuee tells of how they were stereotyped to be of a lower class but in fact believed themselves to be of higher class than the host and that the conditions they were forced to live under were of a poor standard. Source G is an extract from a novel. The reliability of this source is questionable as the facts could have been exaggerated for the sake of the novel. It is not an eyewitness account. It is written for children so the harsher and perhaps more truthful details may have been omitted. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, there were some advantages of evacuation. It kept children away from the major towns and cities that were later bombed. It also drew attention to the city slums because people in the country were shocked to see the condition some of the children coming from the cities were in. They were stunned at the lack of nutrition, clothing and cleanliness. It brought about demands to reform and eradicate such social problems. Some evacuees were well looked after and enjoyed their experiences, working on the farms and eating better than they had done at home. As a result of the 'phoney war' many children returned home by Christmas 1939 despite government poster campaigns to prevent them from doing so. Later they had to be re-evacuated. Some children returned before the bombing and were not re-evacuated so they were originally evacuated for no reason. The lasting result of evacuation however was increased awareness of how bad life in Britain was for many families especially children. = 1000 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

    In this source the government are trying to persuade people to become foster parents by highlighting all the successes of evacuation so far and using children who received a good foster home to show their appreciation; emotional blackmail. This makes this source propaganda, published by the government, meaning that the

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    meaning that the father's opinion was recent and he would not have forgotten any detail. Also, source E is describing the father's opinions about the idea of evacuation whereas source B is describing a teacher's views on what the experience of evacuation was like.

  1. Was Evacuation a success?

    All of the above shows that evacuation was a great success; nevertheless there is a flip side to this source. The mere fact that this advert had to be published shows that evacuation was unsuccessful. This is because there is obviously not enough people taking part in fostering and the government are attempting to publicize the job.

  2. Was Evacuation a success?

    understand the others and their backgrounds and were helpful, kind and patient with them. However, the source is not reliable as it is a novel and the author could have made the situation up, to make the novel more interesting and sellable.

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    According to official figures by the 8th January 1940 almost 900,000 of the evacuees had gone home, despite campaigns to stop this. The fact that evacuation was a failure from the parents point of view is also suggested in source I.

  2. Was Evacuation A Success

    He mentions that if the countryside were poor before the war then they would definitely be poor after the war is over. What makes the source useful is that it is taken from the time of May 1940; however, this interview may have been taken before the Blitz began and

  1. Evacuation was a great success. Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation explain ...

    Children were so unhappy that they ran away from their foster carers or were returned to their homes in a very short time. Source A is a photograph which shows children walking to the train station in September 1939; I consider this source to be reliable as it is an actual photo which captures the actual moment in time.

  2. 'Evacuation was a great success.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain ...

    Secondly, friendships were created, not only between the host families but, between other evacuees. This led to a clashing of classes where, unlike in the city, evacuees and hosts from all social and economic backgrounds were forced to mix. The integration of people, with very different backgrounds, exposed the real divide present in the country at that time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work