• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...


"Evacuation was a great success" by Jamie Clarke Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your own studies In the first world war , German air raids killed1, 1413 people. By the 1930's bombers were much bigger and British Government planners expected far greater casualties. They estimated that 600, 000 people would be killed in a few days. They also expected the use of biological weapons in the form of poison gas. From as early as 1935 plans were made to evacuate all children, pregnant mothers, mothers with young children and disabled people from the major cities of Britain, to much safer rural areas. On 1 September 1939 as war became more likely these plans were put into action. Over 4 days using buses and 4,00 special trains, 1,5million people were evacuated successfully To define evacuation to either success or failure is almost impossible. ...read more.


It is from a mother who hosted children who had been evacuated. She tells of how terrible their manners were and gives the impression of her being of a much higher social class than them. This source is showing the failure of evacuation in the minds of the host family here. Source F is another eyewitness account but this time from an evacuee. This is a turn around from Source E. The evacuee tells of how they were stereotyped to be of a lower class but in fact believed themselves to be of higher class than the host and that the conditions they were forced to live under were of a poor standard. Source G is an extract from a novel. The reliability of this source is questionable as the facts could have been exaggerated for the sake of the novel. It is not an eyewitness account. It is written for children so the harsher and perhaps more truthful details may have been omitted. ...read more.


However, there were some advantages of evacuation. It kept children away from the major towns and cities that were later bombed. It also drew attention to the city slums because people in the country were shocked to see the condition some of the children coming from the cities were in. They were stunned at the lack of nutrition, clothing and cleanliness. It brought about demands to reform and eradicate such social problems. Some evacuees were well looked after and enjoyed their experiences, working on the farms and eating better than they had done at home. As a result of the 'phoney war' many children returned home by Christmas 1939 despite government poster campaigns to prevent them from doing so. Later they had to be re-evacuated. Some children returned before the bombing and were not re-evacuated so they were originally evacuated for no reason. The lasting result of evacuation however was increased awareness of how bad life in Britain was for many families especially children. = 1000 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Was Evacuation a success?

    The source shows us that people moved from cities which were likely to be bombed to the countryside where they were safe and could carry on with their daily lives. However it shows us some of the negatives as it shows us that evacuation started off at a slow pace

  2. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    As well as children not getting picked there were also scenarios were there were mismatches where evacuees were put with a family of a different religion. This could not really be avoided, as it would mean checking each host family's religious belief and making sure it's the same as the children.

  1. Was Evacuation A Success

    her mother think that she will be having a brilliant time with her foster parents. Another reason why this source could be limited is that the letter could be covered up by her Foster Parents leaving out various experiences. The letter is also written as one person's opinion and only

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    Some young children confused their foster parents with their real parents. During the phoney war evacuees became homesick, many had been hurriedly placed in unsuitable billets, dirty and unsanitary, or with people unwilling or unable to look after them properly.

  1. 'Evacuation was a great success' Do you agree?

    days of evacuation, children from the cities sometimes hated the countryside folk and vice-versa, religion was also a cause for division between groups, source C is a perfect example of social division, the woman who has fostered both brother and sister asks them if they have slippers and then goes

  2. Evacuation was a great success. Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation explain ...

    However, this source could be unreliable as it is possible it is Government propaganda to try and convince parents to evacuate their children and there is a change that it could be completely staged. Another unreliable factor is that if a camera is pointed at children they will generally laugh,

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    Both source A and C are unreliable because they might not be showing true attitudes to evacuation. However the audience of source A might not have realised that the source was possibly staged whereas readers of the book that source C is extracted from would know that the book was

  2. 'Evacuation was a great success.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain ...

    Secondly, friendships were created, not only between the host families but, between other evacuees. This led to a clashing of classes where, unlike in the city, evacuees and hosts from all social and economic backgrounds were forced to mix. The integration of people, with very different backgrounds, exposed the real divide present in the country at that time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work