• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Evacuation was a great success" by Jamie Clarke Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your own studies In the first world war , German air raids killed1, 1413 people. By the 1930's bombers were much bigger and British Government planners expected far greater casualties. They estimated that 600, 000 people would be killed in a few days. They also expected the use of biological weapons in the form of poison gas. From as early as 1935 plans were made to evacuate all children, pregnant mothers, mothers with young children and disabled people from the major cities of Britain, to much safer rural areas. On 1 September 1939 as war became more likely these plans were put into action. Over 4 days using buses and 4,00 special trains, 1,5million people were evacuated successfully To define evacuation to either success or failure is almost impossible. ...read more.

Middle

It is from a mother who hosted children who had been evacuated. She tells of how terrible their manners were and gives the impression of her being of a much higher social class than them. This source is showing the failure of evacuation in the minds of the host family here. Source F is another eyewitness account but this time from an evacuee. This is a turn around from Source E. The evacuee tells of how they were stereotyped to be of a lower class but in fact believed themselves to be of higher class than the host and that the conditions they were forced to live under were of a poor standard. Source G is an extract from a novel. The reliability of this source is questionable as the facts could have been exaggerated for the sake of the novel. It is not an eyewitness account. It is written for children so the harsher and perhaps more truthful details may have been omitted. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, there were some advantages of evacuation. It kept children away from the major towns and cities that were later bombed. It also drew attention to the city slums because people in the country were shocked to see the condition some of the children coming from the cities were in. They were stunned at the lack of nutrition, clothing and cleanliness. It brought about demands to reform and eradicate such social problems. Some evacuees were well looked after and enjoyed their experiences, working on the farms and eating better than they had done at home. As a result of the 'phoney war' many children returned home by Christmas 1939 despite government poster campaigns to prevent them from doing so. Later they had to be re-evacuated. Some children returned before the bombing and were not re-evacuated so they were originally evacuated for no reason. The lasting result of evacuation however was increased awareness of how bad life in Britain was for many families especially children. = 1000 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    have been released by the government as propaganda, a way to promote evacuation. The photo shows 'happy' children at bath time at one of the reception centres. The majority of children were not happy about being evacuated, some hated the idea.

  2. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    As well as children not getting picked there were also scenarios were there were mismatches where evacuees were put with a family of a different religion. This could not really be avoided, as it would mean checking each host family's religious belief and making sure it's the same as the children.

  1. Was Evacuation A Success

    her mother think that she will be having a brilliant time with her foster parents. Another reason why this source could be limited is that the letter could be covered up by her Foster Parents leaving out various experiences. The letter is also written as one person's opinion and only

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    know that a lot of parents did not want to be separated from their children or thought that their children would be better off staying in the cities. However, this source is not reliable because it is only an extract from the mass observation survey so does not show a

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree with this interpretation?

    It also shows that it was just as upsetting for a higher-class child to find itself in a slum. It is unclear of its ideas on the war as it is more focused on what the general picture of the different communities was and how it would be better if they were changed.

  2. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    To conclude, Source E indicates a huge failure. Similarly, but on Source E's contrary, Source F also shows social mis-matching. A secondary source, it is again an interview with a World War II evacuee, taken in 1988. It shows that it wasn't just poor, unrefined children that were evacuated.

  1. Was Evacuation a success?

    The teacher would not forget such an event, as it would be something that sticks out in people's minds making this source probably very accurate. So in conclusion to source B, there is evidence to suggest evacuation was successful there is much more to show the failures of the process.

  2. Evacuation was a great success. Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation explain ...

    With the lack of a government body to safeguard the welfare of the evacuated children they were effectively in the hands of the foster carers, some were unlucky and faced hard physical labour, and a few faced physical and mental abuse.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work