• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Evacuation was a great success" by Jamie Clarke Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your own studies In the first world war , German air raids killed1, 1413 people. By the 1930's bombers were much bigger and British Government planners expected far greater casualties. They estimated that 600, 000 people would be killed in a few days. They also expected the use of biological weapons in the form of poison gas. From as early as 1935 plans were made to evacuate all children, pregnant mothers, mothers with young children and disabled people from the major cities of Britain, to much safer rural areas. On 1 September 1939 as war became more likely these plans were put into action. Over 4 days using buses and 4,00 special trains, 1,5million people were evacuated successfully To define evacuation to either success or failure is almost impossible. ...read more.

Middle

It is from a mother who hosted children who had been evacuated. She tells of how terrible their manners were and gives the impression of her being of a much higher social class than them. This source is showing the failure of evacuation in the minds of the host family here. Source F is another eyewitness account but this time from an evacuee. This is a turn around from Source E. The evacuee tells of how they were stereotyped to be of a lower class but in fact believed themselves to be of higher class than the host and that the conditions they were forced to live under were of a poor standard. Source G is an extract from a novel. The reliability of this source is questionable as the facts could have been exaggerated for the sake of the novel. It is not an eyewitness account. It is written for children so the harsher and perhaps more truthful details may have been omitted. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, there were some advantages of evacuation. It kept children away from the major towns and cities that were later bombed. It also drew attention to the city slums because people in the country were shocked to see the condition some of the children coming from the cities were in. They were stunned at the lack of nutrition, clothing and cleanliness. It brought about demands to reform and eradicate such social problems. Some evacuees were well looked after and enjoyed their experiences, working on the farms and eating better than they had done at home. As a result of the 'phoney war' many children returned home by Christmas 1939 despite government poster campaigns to prevent them from doing so. Later they had to be re-evacuated. Some children returned before the bombing and were not re-evacuated so they were originally evacuated for no reason. The lasting result of evacuation however was increased awareness of how bad life in Britain was for many families especially children. = 1000 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    have been released by the government as propaganda, a way to promote evacuation. The photo shows 'happy' children at bath time at one of the reception centres. The majority of children were not happy about being evacuated, some hated the idea.

  2. Was Evacuation A Success

    one sided which makes it a biased source, not all children who were evacuated were this happy. Evacuation was a success because it had saved so many lives; Children were taken out of harms way and were taken to safer homes and families into the countryside, with the help from the government and foster parents.

  1. Evacuation was a great success. Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation explain ...

    Overall this shows the failures of evacuation as there were not enough families volunteering to provide homes and people had to be forced to take children - this may have resulted in poor care for evacuated children as they were unwanted in many homes.

  2. 'Evacuation was a great success.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain ...

    What about those who agreed to take children in? Why did they do so? The answer is that the vast majority simply wanted 'to do their bit' to help the country in war. These included philanthropists who saw an opportunity to serve those who needed help.

  1. Evacuation was a great success

    In the interview the father states how he believes that his child would be better off at home because the place where they wanted to send him did not have enough resources to look after him. He also wants his child to be looked after by someone who he knows personally incise he died during the war.

  2. Was Evacuation a success?

    In the source it states that 20,000 Scots are fostering and this advert is enticing others to do the same, while the last sentence in the appeal reads; "You may be saving a child's life." This shows that people are proud and is, once again, using emotion to appeal to its readers.

  1. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

    The teacher would not forget such an event, as it would be something that sticks out in people's minds making this source probably very accurate. So in conclusion to source B, there is evidence to suggest evacuation was successful there is much more to show the failures of the process.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

    Source G portrays evacuation as a positive thing. It shows that the children are being well looked after by a nice host, who is keeping them safe from the bombing. The government could have called evacuation a success as 1.5 million children were evacuated, which would also mean that evacuation was a success in the minds of many parents, as their children were kept safe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work