• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Evacuation was a great success" by Jamie Clarke Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your own studies In the first world war , German air raids killed1, 1413 people. By the 1930's bombers were much bigger and British Government planners expected far greater casualties. They estimated that 600, 000 people would be killed in a few days. They also expected the use of biological weapons in the form of poison gas. From as early as 1935 plans were made to evacuate all children, pregnant mothers, mothers with young children and disabled people from the major cities of Britain, to much safer rural areas. On 1 September 1939 as war became more likely these plans were put into action. Over 4 days using buses and 4,00 special trains, 1,5million people were evacuated successfully To define evacuation to either success or failure is almost impossible. ...read more.

Middle

It is from a mother who hosted children who had been evacuated. She tells of how terrible their manners were and gives the impression of her being of a much higher social class than them. This source is showing the failure of evacuation in the minds of the host family here. Source F is another eyewitness account but this time from an evacuee. This is a turn around from Source E. The evacuee tells of how they were stereotyped to be of a lower class but in fact believed themselves to be of higher class than the host and that the conditions they were forced to live under were of a poor standard. Source G is an extract from a novel. The reliability of this source is questionable as the facts could have been exaggerated for the sake of the novel. It is not an eyewitness account. It is written for children so the harsher and perhaps more truthful details may have been omitted. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, there were some advantages of evacuation. It kept children away from the major towns and cities that were later bombed. It also drew attention to the city slums because people in the country were shocked to see the condition some of the children coming from the cities were in. They were stunned at the lack of nutrition, clothing and cleanliness. It brought about demands to reform and eradicate such social problems. Some evacuees were well looked after and enjoyed their experiences, working on the farms and eating better than they had done at home. As a result of the 'phoney war' many children returned home by Christmas 1939 despite government poster campaigns to prevent them from doing so. Later they had to be re-evacuated. Some children returned before the bombing and were not re-evacuated so they were originally evacuated for no reason. The lasting result of evacuation however was increased awareness of how bad life in Britain was for many families especially children. = 1000 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    As well as children not getting picked there were also scenarios were there were mismatches where evacuees were put with a family of a different religion. This could not really be avoided, as it would mean checking each host family's religious belief and making sure it's the same as the children.

  2. Was Evacuation A Success

    Evacuation also allowed poor inner city children escape poverty and gave many children the chance to help improve their lives for the better. For many, it was also a great adventure for example, looking at source F; it gives an insight into how successful and exciting evacuation really was.

  1. Was Evacuation a success?

    The fact that this advert is propaganda means there are no negatives about evacuation contained in it, hiding all the information from the public. An example of this would be where it is stated that 20,000 Scots are already foster parents; if this number were lower it would simply be left out of the appeal.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree with this interpretation?

    It also shows that it was just as upsetting for a higher-class child to find itself in a slum. It is unclear of its ideas on the war as it is more focused on what the general picture of the different communities was and how it would be better if they were changed.

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

    Also, the transportation stage of evacuation was poorly planed, as Source B highlights, "we hadn't the slightest idea where we were going".

  2. "Evacuation was a success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your ...

    The government sound very manipulative. They use very emotional language throughout the article. This shows that evacuation was a great success in some ways, as government were trying to make out that it was, however it does seem that the evacuation process was failing as the government needed to publish an article to get the publics support.

  1. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    It shows how a poor, working class child was placed with a higher (middle-upper) class host. The evacuated family, which included the mother, was of a very poor background. The host complained of the children urinating on the walls. She even told the mother of the evacuated family to try

  2. "Evacuation was a great success!" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Use ...

    The 2^nd and 3^rd waves of evacuation were also not a success. In the 2^nd wave only a small amount of children were evacuated from danger zones, about 200,000 in all. The 3^rd wave was a complete failure, more bombs were dropped in 3 months than in the whole of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work