• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...


"Evacuation was a great success" by Jamie Clarke Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your own studies In the first world war , German air raids killed1, 1413 people. By the 1930's bombers were much bigger and British Government planners expected far greater casualties. They estimated that 600, 000 people would be killed in a few days. They also expected the use of biological weapons in the form of poison gas. From as early as 1935 plans were made to evacuate all children, pregnant mothers, mothers with young children and disabled people from the major cities of Britain, to much safer rural areas. On 1 September 1939 as war became more likely these plans were put into action. Over 4 days using buses and 4,00 special trains, 1,5million people were evacuated successfully To define evacuation to either success or failure is almost impossible. ...read more.


It is from a mother who hosted children who had been evacuated. She tells of how terrible their manners were and gives the impression of her being of a much higher social class than them. This source is showing the failure of evacuation in the minds of the host family here. Source F is another eyewitness account but this time from an evacuee. This is a turn around from Source E. The evacuee tells of how they were stereotyped to be of a lower class but in fact believed themselves to be of higher class than the host and that the conditions they were forced to live under were of a poor standard. Source G is an extract from a novel. The reliability of this source is questionable as the facts could have been exaggerated for the sake of the novel. It is not an eyewitness account. It is written for children so the harsher and perhaps more truthful details may have been omitted. ...read more.


However, there were some advantages of evacuation. It kept children away from the major towns and cities that were later bombed. It also drew attention to the city slums because people in the country were shocked to see the condition some of the children coming from the cities were in. They were stunned at the lack of nutrition, clothing and cleanliness. It brought about demands to reform and eradicate such social problems. Some evacuees were well looked after and enjoyed their experiences, working on the farms and eating better than they had done at home. As a result of the 'phoney war' many children returned home by Christmas 1939 despite government poster campaigns to prevent them from doing so. Later they had to be re-evacuated. Some children returned before the bombing and were not re-evacuated so they were originally evacuated for no reason. The lasting result of evacuation however was increased awareness of how bad life in Britain was for many families especially children. = 1000 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    However, the sources differ as they were written or made on different dates. The interview in source E was done in 1940 but source F was made in 987. This affects their attitudes towards evacuation because the director of source F would have had time to research evacuation whereas the father in source E did not.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

    In this source the government are trying to persuade people to become foster parents by highlighting all the successes of evacuation so far and using children who received a good foster home to show their appreciation; emotional blackmail. This makes this source propaganda, published by the government, meaning that the

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    This source could be reliable as it shows a parents feelings and opinions whose son should have been evacuated. Though the source may not be useful as it can't be used for factual information, it only shows one mans opinions.

  2. Was Evacuation a success?

    This advert was published in 1940, one year after evacuation had begun, meaning that the government hadn't done enough in the early years of the war to encourage people to evacuate and foster. The government are trying to sell the idea to potential foster parents who now need a lot of convincing.

  1. Was Evacuation A Success

    her mother think that she will be having a brilliant time with her foster parents. Another reason why this source could be limited is that the letter could be covered up by her Foster Parents leaving out various experiences. The letter is also written as one person's opinion and only

  2. Evacuation was a great success. Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation explain ...

    Many felt forced to care for children against their will and made wrong assumptions regarding the children's background and wealth. Source D is an advertisement issued by the government appealing for more people in Scotland to provide homes for evacuated children.

  1. 'Evacuation was a great success.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain ...

    feelings of mutual affection and eventually most evacuees were treated like members of family. These children were showered with love and affection which lasted long after the war had ended. Evacuees who came from the poorest of families might have been the ones who benefited the most from this new found friendship, all thanks to evacuation.

  2. Evacuation was a great success

    The Source was produced along time after the event, which means that it was not propaganda and it is likely to be a factual account of her experience, however being so long after the event means that her opinion could have changed over the course of time, or by someone or something influencing her memories.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work