• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies.

Extracts from this document...


Helen Blyth. Coursework B Evacuation "Evacuation was a success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?" Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies. The sources all show different attitudes tot the evacuation of children, some show that evacuation was a great success, however some show that it wasn't such a success. They all show this in different ways-pictures, interviews with the parents and teachers, advertisements and novels so some evidence is more reliable then others. Source A is a very positive attitude or impression to evacuation as it shows evacuees walking to the station in London in September 1939. The children don't look at all bothered, they seem to be smiling and waving to the person who is taking the photograph. Although this is a photograph so it will be real, it isn't that reliable in showing the attitudes or impression towards evacuation because the rest of Great Britain may have different views on the whole evacuation idea, probably a lot of children and the parent would be feeling quite distraught as it would be quite an emotional experience so it definitely isn't at all reliable at showing what evacuation was like and the publics attitude. ...read more.


This doesn't either give any ideas that evacuation was a great success or not. Source D is a source of propaganda so of course it's going to be a positive attitude. The government needed to persuade families to think about joining the roll of those who were willing to receive children form all over the country. Though the government seem to be in desperation, and the public might have thought, the evacuation plan is failing because no one seems to be volunteering to help out. There are two children in the picture, they look fairly happy, and this will again definitely appeal to families. The picture of the two children has two contrasting backgrounds behind them, one is of the countryside, which looks quite pleasant, and the other looks like an industrial estate, with flying planes over it. The government needed the public to think the children would be much safer and happier in the countryside. In the article/text the government have purposely put many questions in it, this would probably make you agree with them, as it would make you think twice. ...read more.


This doesn't show that evacuation was necessarily a great success really, however it does show the many lives that were saved because of the evacuation; the film shows many downsides to evacuation, and how it destroyed many families. On a whole, most of the sources are very negative about evacuation, so I don't really think it was a great success for the public, as they were the ones who were experiencing it and they didn't really approve of it, however for the government it was a great success as they saved some of their population plus other countries thought it was successful too so this was good for the British government. None of the sources give a clear picture on what and how the public were feeling about evacuation and whether they thought it would be or was a success. Everyone in Britain all had very strong and different views about it. Although it does show that government had a very good attitude towards to their public and their safety. In my views, I don't think evacuation was a great success, it was successful but there could have been other ways of solving it. Top of Form ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    where they ate strange food, before falling into a lonely and strange bed. Some were excluded from their foster family's. The child evacuees were sometimes treated differently to their foster parents children, and were sometimes resented as a burden. "Evacuation was a great success."

  2. 'Evacuation was a great success.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain ...

    On the other hand some parents did not even attempt to send there children away from high-risk bombing areas. Source I shows a father's opposition to evacuation. "I'm not letting him go. They can't be looked after where they're sending them."

  1. Was Evacuation A Success

    The source is also limited because this is a novel written for children so she would be using safe language and therefore may have taken important parts of the novel out or she may have changed it a slight bit.

  2. Evacuation was a great success. Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation explain ...

    smile and wave, however this may not reflect how they are actually feeling and the light hearted mood my be just because the camera is taking their photograph. Another unreliable point is that the photo is in one particular area, it is quite possible that one minute further along the road children were crying, distraught and unhappy.

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    However, not all children hated evacuation and many were excited to be going away from home as they saw it as a holiday. The teacher might have been exaggerating how bad evacuation was to add effect and to make her view of evacuation seem more interesting.

  2. Free essay

    why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    The photo can be linked to source D, in that they are both visual representations of evacuated children. The sources show the same thing, evacuated evacuating children looking happy. Source A; does however, contradict Source B. Source B is a teacher claiming that "the children were too afraid to talk".

  1. Evacuation was a great success

    I know from my studies that many foster parents did assume evacuees to be poor; however I also know that there was not enough room for slippers in the evacuee's suitcases because evacuees were not allowed any luxuries. This is an example of the indifferent relationship between town and country

  2. Was Evacuation a success?

    The children and adults in this picture may only be smiling due to a natural reaction to the camera, so in reality the subjects in the picture may very well be unhappy at the fact they that have to be evacuated.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work