• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Evacuation was a success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies.

Extracts from this document...


Helen Blyth. Coursework B Evacuation "Evacuation was a success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?" Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies. The sources all show different attitudes tot the evacuation of children, some show that evacuation was a great success, however some show that it wasn't such a success. They all show this in different ways-pictures, interviews with the parents and teachers, advertisements and novels so some evidence is more reliable then others. Source A is a very positive attitude or impression to evacuation as it shows evacuees walking to the station in London in September 1939. The children don't look at all bothered, they seem to be smiling and waving to the person who is taking the photograph. Although this is a photograph so it will be real, it isn't that reliable in showing the attitudes or impression towards evacuation because the rest of Great Britain may have different views on the whole evacuation idea, probably a lot of children and the parent would be feeling quite distraught as it would be quite an emotional experience so it definitely isn't at all reliable at showing what evacuation was like and the publics attitude. ...read more.


This doesn't either give any ideas that evacuation was a great success or not. Source D is a source of propaganda so of course it's going to be a positive attitude. The government needed to persuade families to think about joining the roll of those who were willing to receive children form all over the country. Though the government seem to be in desperation, and the public might have thought, the evacuation plan is failing because no one seems to be volunteering to help out. There are two children in the picture, they look fairly happy, and this will again definitely appeal to families. The picture of the two children has two contrasting backgrounds behind them, one is of the countryside, which looks quite pleasant, and the other looks like an industrial estate, with flying planes over it. The government needed the public to think the children would be much safer and happier in the countryside. In the article/text the government have purposely put many questions in it, this would probably make you agree with them, as it would make you think twice. ...read more.


This doesn't show that evacuation was necessarily a great success really, however it does show the many lives that were saved because of the evacuation; the film shows many downsides to evacuation, and how it destroyed many families. On a whole, most of the sources are very negative about evacuation, so I don't really think it was a great success for the public, as they were the ones who were experiencing it and they didn't really approve of it, however for the government it was a great success as they saved some of their population plus other countries thought it was successful too so this was good for the British government. None of the sources give a clear picture on what and how the public were feeling about evacuation and whether they thought it would be or was a success. Everyone in Britain all had very strong and different views about it. Although it does show that government had a very good attitude towards to their public and their safety. In my views, I don't think evacuation was a great success, it was successful but there could have been other ways of solving it. Top of Form ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. History Coursework - Evacuation Assignment

    They had had propaganda presented to them, but no real information about evacuation, and what would happen to the children and teachers. All the information they had had was posters and campaigns to persuade the public to agree with evacuation.

  2. Evacuation was a great success. Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation explain ...

    On the negative side, the book is fictional and was written to entertain an audience, there is the possibility that the author has stretched the truth and exaggerated to entertain the reader. I also know very little about the author and her experiences of the war - she may have

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    Overall, I don't think this source is a reliable representation of attitudes because we are not viewing the whole interview so cannot tell what the overall opinion of the interview is. Also, the extract of the interview that is in the source might be a loaded question and therefore makes the source unreliable.

  2. Free essay

    why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    to live in Southend "they've nothing there" Source B is an extract from an interview in 1988 with a teacher. The teacher recalls being evacuated with children from her school. The interview took place to get a greater insight into what people thought about the evacuation of children.

  1. Was Evacuation a success?

    The reason for this is that if it was to go into extreme details then the children may find it boring. Also to make the novel more interesting the author may have also added false details just to make the story more interesting, hence it is no longer reliable.

  2. Was Evacuation Sucessfull

    Children were only very young and being separated from their parents was a scary thing for the children at the time which would have made them miserable. The same goes for the parents, how could they concentrate on the war effort if they were too worried about how their children were?

  1. Why do sources A-F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of children

    so the father would have seen the evacuation of his son as pointless as no cities had actually been bombed yet despite the governments fears. The man's attitude toward the evacuation issue is very personal-he doesn't want his son sent away from him to go and live with strangers.

  2. Evacuation was a great success' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain ...

    It put great pressure on families both in the danger zones and foster families taking in evacuees. Many foster families could not survive with the government allowance provided them with and held this against the children: "A great many hosts find it impossible to manage on government allowance...majority treated girls as unpaid maids."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work