• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the arguments for and against oral history as an historical method.

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the arguments for and against oral history as an historical method. In order to respond adequately to this topic you should (a) examine a number of arguments made for and against oral history, and (b) examine a work of history that makes substantial use of oral history. Some examples: ABC, Voices from a Vanishing Australia Bowden, Being Aboriginal Gilbert, Living Black Huggins, Auntie Rita Lowenstein, Weevils in the Flour Lowenstein and Loh, The Immigrants Tatz, Black Viewpoints York, Speaking of Us Oral history is commonly referred to as an unreliable source of information for historical use due to it's single minded approach, however when the term history is examined, discovering exactley who, how, and why 'history' is created, oral testimony seems as reliable as any source of historical evidence. Among the arguments for and against oral history, the most important issue is to remember the purpose of oral history. It is not to be taken as a primary source of information becuase of its nature, however when used in relation to social context oral history has the ablity to give a much more board perspective, rather than relying on the records kept by the most powerful civilisation at the time. ...read more.


History has been described as a highly selective disipline by the likes of Finley (2000) who will most likely rarely be mentioned in history books, however those such as Aristole who also openly rejected history are frequently mentioned throughout history.(Finley, M 2000 p.11) Unless Finley is to predict the future, this in itself is an example of histories selectivness. Historians are responsible for what we reguard as history, however it has been their choice as to what to reguard as relivant history, much like the way one whould choose to recall certain aspects during an interview. Enevitably all recorded history comes under scrutiny of the indiviual historian, wether it be the oral historians choice of subject and questions, or the ancient historian who chooses what evidence to use, whether being government archives or meuseams, and its degree of relivancy depending upon individual interpretation. It is the interpretation of history, the fact that a dominate historian or culture decides what is history and what is everyday life that makes it so particular, or disiplinary. Although it has been extreamly challenged by historians, reguarding the nineth chapter as not dealing with history at all, Aristole's work in large is not contructed with facts, figures, statistics or details of a recorded event. ...read more.


, however ones reason or perception of truth can only be held accountable by the individual. Given that, the central problem seen with oral history is that it overshadows, or is opinionitive, yet all historical evidence, whether it be newspaper articles, government statistics or oral testimony comes under the perception of one mind eventually. All forms of evidence are created for a single purpose and their continuing existence also comes under scrutiny from not only the modern collective public perception, given the case with relocating and destroying monuments depending on their recent realivance (Davison, G 1998 p.59), but also the public servents working to control archives. After realising that all data and recorded evidence is opinitive there remains no reason to exclude oral history as a historical method. Oral history can be seen in the light as social history becuase what results is the perception of life through the selected subject. When oral testimony encounters both sides of the story, such as white and black perception, the historian is able to glance into the imaginitive world of the interviewees. So long as the historians takes both counts into equal weighting, oral history allows what other forms of history can not, the ability to discover how and why we percive our world completely, underlying all we create. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. The Impacts of crusades on European and Middle Eastern Historical development.

    of God, which is the sin against the Holy Ghost (Treece, The Crusades, p. vii). Furthermore Treece goes on to say that the "Holy crusaders" were doing nothing more they their fathers and their father's father had done, business. Superficially, it may be proved that at a certain date in

  2. 'To use history for recreation is to misuse it'. Discuss

    be argued that it is not wrong to use history as recreation. Although academic historians may argue that presenting history as a source of entertainment is not the way that history should learnt, it is clear that a great deal of satisfaction and knowledge is gained from visiting museums, particularly

  1. 'How did Hegel envisage the course of history and upon what did he base ...

    'Man in his very nature is destined to be free.'35 Christianity introduced the element of subjective consciousness. Religious self-consciousness created ability for individuals to break the hold of their natural existence and desires. Christ was after all both human and the Son of God.

  2. What was the Purpose and Nature of the Final Solution?

    If the villagers made up petitions to move the camps elsewhere nothing substantial suggests that they didn't have different reasons other than these. The American serviceman even goes on to say, "I never knew what to believe"; if even he doesn't believe his own claims then we should have no strong reason to believe them.

  1. How Did the Views and the Arguments put forward by Supporters and opponents of ...

    Therefore again if the KK were true Americans they would freely accept immigrants into their country as everyone has an equal opportunity. Religion The Klan had very strong views of many Religious Groups, the KKK itself were Christian Protestants. The KKK Protestants called themselves WASPS, White Anglo Saxon Protestants.

  2. Explain how the changing reputation of Columbus illuminates the nature of historical study.

    on the individual, in Marxist term in order to understand the topic historians would have to look beyond the man himself and more at the social conditions of the time in questions. Historians such as Von Ranke enforced the ideal that the study of History was to; "Simply to show it how it really was."

  1. The Panchayat system as an early form of conflict resolution in Trinidad.

    The Panchayat would have met in the village of anyone of the parties. Invitations were sent any time before the meeting, from a full week to only a few hours ahead. The meetings were held after work, in the late afternoons often moving into the night.

  2. Objective histories.

    sources fit and what we receive is the historian's view not the actual past. The status of historical enquiry has been a longstanding debate, especially since the rise of postmodernism in the later part of the twentieth century. Another of the most heated arguments concern the objectives and limitations of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work