• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the arguments for and against oral history as an historical method.

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the arguments for and against oral history as an historical method. In order to respond adequately to this topic you should (a) examine a number of arguments made for and against oral history, and (b) examine a work of history that makes substantial use of oral history. Some examples: ABC, Voices from a Vanishing Australia Bowden, Being Aboriginal Gilbert, Living Black Huggins, Auntie Rita Lowenstein, Weevils in the Flour Lowenstein and Loh, The Immigrants Tatz, Black Viewpoints York, Speaking of Us Oral history is commonly referred to as an unreliable source of information for historical use due to it's single minded approach, however when the term history is examined, discovering exactley who, how, and why 'history' is created, oral testimony seems as reliable as any source of historical evidence. Among the arguments for and against oral history, the most important issue is to remember the purpose of oral history. It is not to be taken as a primary source of information becuase of its nature, however when used in relation to social context oral history has the ablity to give a much more board perspective, rather than relying on the records kept by the most powerful civilisation at the time. ...read more.


History has been described as a highly selective disipline by the likes of Finley (2000) who will most likely rarely be mentioned in history books, however those such as Aristole who also openly rejected history are frequently mentioned throughout history.(Finley, M 2000 p.11) Unless Finley is to predict the future, this in itself is an example of histories selectivness. Historians are responsible for what we reguard as history, however it has been their choice as to what to reguard as relivant history, much like the way one whould choose to recall certain aspects during an interview. Enevitably all recorded history comes under scrutiny of the indiviual historian, wether it be the oral historians choice of subject and questions, or the ancient historian who chooses what evidence to use, whether being government archives or meuseams, and its degree of relivancy depending upon individual interpretation. It is the interpretation of history, the fact that a dominate historian or culture decides what is history and what is everyday life that makes it so particular, or disiplinary. Although it has been extreamly challenged by historians, reguarding the nineth chapter as not dealing with history at all, Aristole's work in large is not contructed with facts, figures, statistics or details of a recorded event. ...read more.


, however ones reason or perception of truth can only be held accountable by the individual. Given that, the central problem seen with oral history is that it overshadows, or is opinionitive, yet all historical evidence, whether it be newspaper articles, government statistics or oral testimony comes under the perception of one mind eventually. All forms of evidence are created for a single purpose and their continuing existence also comes under scrutiny from not only the modern collective public perception, given the case with relocating and destroying monuments depending on their recent realivance (Davison, G 1998 p.59), but also the public servents working to control archives. After realising that all data and recorded evidence is opinitive there remains no reason to exclude oral history as a historical method. Oral history can be seen in the light as social history becuase what results is the perception of life through the selected subject. When oral testimony encounters both sides of the story, such as white and black perception, the historian is able to glance into the imaginitive world of the interviewees. So long as the historians takes both counts into equal weighting, oral history allows what other forms of history can not, the ability to discover how and why we percive our world completely, underlying all we create. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. How reliable is the photograph as a historical source?

    is a generally reliable and truthful witness, alterations to its image being difficult to effect and easy, on the whole, to detect.',13 appears a little na�ve to twenty-first century readers. Even so, the photographs in his book demonstrate the value of this medium for the preservation of a memory of

  2. 'How did Hegel envisage the course of history and upon what did he base ...

    remarked, 'It is a truly wonderful experience to see such an individual, on horseback, concentrating on one point, stretching over the world and dominating it.'39 However, although individuals and nations were part of the dialectical process, they were 'mere tools, mostly unaware of the importance and significance of their own

  1. Thucydides' historical technique.

    Thucydides later became a general for the Athenians, and was unfortunate to be sent to Amphipolis and was to liberate it from Brasidas (the premier Spartan general), in 424 B.C. Although he captured nearby Eion, he was exiled for his failure, and spent his remaining years abroad.

  2. The Impacts of crusades on European and Middle Eastern Historical development.

    the idealized crusader, a red cross on his white mantle, his mailed hands clasped on the hilt of the sword which he had dedicated to Christ and the salvation of the Holy Sepulcher, a prayer always on his lips..." when in actuality, the crusades may have been largely influenced by the selfish desires of men (Treece, The Crusades, p.

  1. The Panchayat system as an early form of conflict resolution in Trinidad.

    By the 1950's most Indo Trinidadian parents, including village parents, conceded to personal choice as the best method of mate selection. Marriages were no longer elaborate three-day festivities under bamboo. They had adopted influences from the Christians, the bride wore a white dress and the wedding was preformed on a table.

  2. Consider the treatment of history in Julian Barnes's A History of The World in ...

    This argument points out that historical narratives can never provide objective truth and that stories that pose as such are a sham. The title of Julian Barnes' 1989 novel, A History of the World in 10 1/2 Chapters is at once playful and provocative.

  1. De Bernieres describes History as 'Hearsay tempered with myth and hazy memory.' How does ...

    This view is reflected in de Berni�res use of polyphony. The diverse spectrum of narrative perspectives reinforces the novel's underlying argument as proposed by Carlo that history should be based on the experiences of "little people" rather than the "propaganda of the victors".

  2. Emily Wilding Davison

    This shows that to Emily Davison the wspu was her pride and joy to show everybody who she was - like a form of identity. A suffragette fighting for her cause without tragedy. However tragedy happened as her friend says she did not know if Emily changed her mind to a more dramatic protest of bravery and heroism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work