• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the tactics and strategies employed by the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese army, and the USand Australian armed forces.

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the tactics and strategies employed by the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese army, and the US and Australian armed forces. The tactics and strategies employed by the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army, and the US and Australian Armed forces, were to become the prime determinants of the outcome of the conflict. Despite America's abundant resources and advanced technology, their various tactics such as 'search and destroy', Operation Rolling Thunder, defoliation, air attacks, the strategic hamlet program and the winning hearts and minds policy proved inefficient and unsuited to the environment. In contrast, the Viet Cong and the NVA utilised highly effective strategies including advanced guerilla warfare tactics, booby traps, the use of the Ho Chi Minh trail, underground tunnels and in particular, gaining the support of the peasants and disguising themselves amongst them. The poor US policies and tactic as well as the effectiveness of the strategies applied by the communist forces ultimately resulted in the US withdrawal and the demise of the south. The Second Indo-Chinese war was fought in the jungles and countryside of mainly South Vietnam, a combat environment which US soldiers were not familiar with. The Viet Cong had adopted strategic guerilla warfare tactics as their chief method of attack. Small guerrilla units operated from bases established in remote and inaccessible mountainous terrain and relied heavily on the support of local inhabitants for food, shelter, recruits and information. ...read more.


The most infamous of these was napalm, a mixture of petrol and a chemical thickener which produces a tough sticky gel that attaches itself to the skin. The igniting agent, white phosphorus, continues burning for a considerable amount of time. A reported three quarters of all napalm victims in Vietnam were burned through to the muscle and bone. The pain caused by the burning is so traumatic that it often causes death. The US also made considerable use of anti-personal cluster bombs, particularly in populated areas. The bombs contained hundreds of pellets which burst out at extremely high velocities, ripping open the body of anyone within range. The bombing and shelling of Operation Rolling Thunder was horrifically devastating in terms of casualties, however it did little to weaken the northern advance as well as the morale and determination of the communist forces. As one North Vietnamese citizen comments, "The Americans thought that the more bombs they dropped, the quicker we would fall to our knees and surrender. But the Bombs heightened rather than dampened our spirit" [Wood]. Although the Americans had superior technology and weaponry, it was the superiority of the communists' tactics and strategies that won them the war. The Ho Chi Minh trail, running parallel to South Vietnam through Laos and Cambodia, was the lifeline of the Viet Cong-NVA alliance. ...read more.


The Australian troops serving in Vietnam were more familiar jungle and guerilla warfare than the Americans, having learned techniques in prior experiences in Borneo and Malaya. As a Vietnamese man, Trinh Duc recalls, "The Australians were more patient than the Americans, better guerrilla fighters, better at ambushes" [Harpur]. Australian soldiers were chiefly involved in training the ARVN, 'search and destroy' missions and aggressive patrolling. The tactics employed by the Australian forces included searching for enemies and their resources, utilising common guerilla warfare techniques, interrogating suspects, uncovering underground tunnel networks and destroying key enemy bases. Units consisted of tight-knit groups of young men who had higher levels of discipline and morale than the Americans as well as a strong sense of comradeship and camaraderie. The vast array of tactics employed by the US and the South Vietnamese Army as well as the military strategies and schemes of the Viet Minh and the North Vietnamese were essentially the decisive factors of Second Indo-Chinese conflict. America's ultimate firepower, helicopters and various tactics, including strategic hamlets program, WHAM, Operation Rolling Thunder, 'search and destroy' and defoliation were mostly operated in enormous scales, yet they were unsuccessful in crushing the communist advance. On the other hand, the strategies used by the Viet Cong and the Northern forces were of great sophistication and proved to be most effective in terms of demising the South. After centuries of struggle and conflict, the tenacious Vietnamese had at last gained the promising possibility of a peaceful and liberated Vietnam. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Why did America Fail to Defeat its Vietnamese Enemies Between 1965 and 1969?

    But this failed due to the sensors being over sensitive and therefore picked up animals, so planes bombed areas with no guerrillas in, so wastage of bombs was a failure. I think that these failures led to low morale within the American forces but by no means were they the most important factor.

  2. What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the ...

    They promised that in 1956 elections would be held for re-unification of the country and they were not. Then in 1963, President Diem was overthrown and murdered in a coup backed by the U.S. This tactic was ineffective as it made the Vietnamese people dislike the Americans.

  1. From the beginning of the war the NFL realised that in order to win ...

    The hit and run tactics were designed to put small holes in the enemy that eventually amounted to winning the war. The NLF�s resources from the beginning were stretched, not necessarily manpower but weapons and other such resources were scarce.

  2. How effective were the US tactics of search and destroy and defoliation in the ...

    They also created a device which could cover a surface with flames that were 270 feet long and 75 feet wide. It was so powerful that it would burn right through clothes and burn skin until it reached the bone.

  1. I think that the four most significant themes in the Vietnam War were protest ...

    we know the enemy and know our allies and know ourselves, we?d better keep out of this kind of dirty business. It?s very dangerous.? This quote explains America?s attitude towards their foreign policy and also suggests why America haven?t gone into a war since without allies; they learnt in Vietnam not to go into a war they knew little about.

  2. How effective were the US tactics of 'Search and Destroy' and 'Defoliation' in the ...

    Civilian casualties were also very high compared to the number of Viet Cong weapons found, for every weapon found there were six civilian deaths (Source 2).

  1. How Effective Were The Tactics Of Search And Destroy And Defoliation During The Vietnam ...

    This also led to a high US death rate. Correspondingly, Westmoreland also introduced the Body Count. This was the amount of VC killed by a single troop. The main objective was to increase moral in Vietnam but also back home in America.

  2. Discuss the effectiveness of US tactics such as 'defoliation' and 'search and destroy'

    The defoliation tactic succeeded in that it achieved its main aim of defoliating rural and forested areas and restricting the Vietcong access to food and cover. In total ?5 million acres of forest? [6] was defoliated and ?500,000 acres of cropland destroyed? [6] meaning rural support was likely denied to the guerrillas, helping the war effort.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work