Examine the main factors which led British Governments to follow a policy of 'appeasement' in the period 1931-38

Authors Avatar

Examine the main factors which led British Governments to follow a policy of ‘appeasement’ in the period 1931-38

Appeasement was the foreign policy of Britain adopted during the 1930s. It was the policy of Britain to negotiate with the dictators, and grant concessions in order to avoid war. Appeasement was followed by successive governments from Baldwin and Macdonald to Chamberlain.

Appeasement prevailed in the period 1931-39 as the foreign policy of Britain because it had so few critics and aroused public support. The horrors of the First World War were still a bitter personal memory for many and British citizens feared the threat of bombing, which became even stronger from 1936 onwards, following the German bombing of the defenceless population of the Spanish town of Guernica, during the Spanish Civil War. This attack had left 1,600 men, women and children dead and sent shock waves around the world. In 1933 at the Oxford Union Debate it was declared that it would not fight for King and Country if called upon. Again, in the Peace Pledge Union Ballot in 1935, 92.35% of those who voted favoured universal disarmament by international decision. Many also believed that Germany had been harshly treated at Versailles.

Appeasement has been criticised as misguided. Many claim that decisive action against the threats of the dictators may have prevented the Second World War. However it is easy to judge with hindsight. Appeasement prevailed because the political leader and their leading advisers favoured it or indeed saw no alternative to the policy. The key figure associated with appeasement was Neville Chamberlain. He himself had been deeply affected by the last war, losing close relatives, and it is understandable that this was one reason that he tried so hard to avert war.

After the Treaty of Versailles was created many people began to feel that it was too harsh, because first of all it did not follow Woodrow Wilson’s fourteen points which the Germans had first agreed to. The Treaty of Versailles also blamed Germany for the war, the war guilt clause – Article 231. Germans felt that this was very harsh because they had been told that they were fighting a defensive war, so how could they be blamed for the cause of the war if they were only defending themselves. However they had to admit guilt for the war, as this was the only way for the allies to ask for reparations from Germany. It was also very harsh because it gave every nation apart from Germany national self determination, which meant they could choose which country they would be apart of. The loss of territory made the situation even worse because it split Germany in half and left Germans living in the Polish Corridor.

Join now!

The Treaty was very difficult to enforce without actually having troops in Germany and Britain did not want to start wars over such “small matters” as German re-armament from 1933. All Britain could do was complain through the League of Nations. The League of Nations was invented by Woodrow Wilson. It was based on the idea of collective security, where an attack on one country is an attack on all the members. Ironically, America never joined the League as Congress refused to accept the Treaty of Versailles and preferred to follow an isolationist policy in the 1920’s and 1930’s. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay