• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the relative importance of the reasons why the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 and the Balkan Wars of 1912 and 1913 did not develop into a general European conflict.

Extracts from this document...


Examine the relative importance of the reasons why the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 and the Balkan Wars of 1912 and 1913 did not develop into a general European conflict. The Bosnian Crisis of 1908-09 and the Balkan Wars of 1912-13 were stepping stones in the build up to European conflict, however the great powers and other countries had their reasons why they were reluctant to go to war. The countries had their separate reasons why it wasn't of their best interest to go into European conflict, mainly because there was more to lose than to gain out of it. Alliances broken, Europe divided, funding that countries hadn't got. All these were main reasons why there wasn't European conflict. At the end of the Balkans War, the disposition of Macedonia, the problems of Crete, and liberation of the countries still under Ottoman control, especially Albania, were all main issues. The Balkans was in crisis and many different countries such as Russia, Austria-Hungary and Britain all had views on what should happen there, or what has already happened in the Balkans. ...read more.


The government was under pressure from the Russian people to achieve victories on foreign soil, but Russia was reluctant, like Britain to go into battle. They also didn't have the full support of Britain and France so they would be going into a war with Austria and Germany, without any help. These reasons are very important in why a major conflict did not develop from the Bosnian Crisis or the Balkan Wars. France was beginning to establish its position when Poincare became the French Prime Minister. He wanted to keep the triple alliance stable so it would strengthen the country and its foreign policy. But Britain nor Russia were ready for war and with France only just establishing its alliances they weren't ready to mobilize their army. So although they had fresh alliances they were not ready with their army or the support to go into a war. Austria-Hungary was a main player in the lead up to World War one, and was already in part of the Balkans, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The problem was Austria had too many different problems to attend to and it wasn't in their best interest to go to war at this present time. ...read more.


This would almost definitely have started major European conflict. Conclusion The reasons why the Bosnian Crisis and the Balkan Wars didn't develop into general European conflict were due to a mixture of reasons from all the countries whom it concerned. The triple alliance of Britain, France and Russia wasn't as yet established and the full support from Britain wasn't guaranteed. These unassurances meant that countries were wary of mobilizing their troops. Money, Army strength, support, gains for the country, were all very important reasons why all these countries didn't go into general European conflict after the Bosnian Crisis and the Balkan Wars. All these factors mount up to the inevitable stalemate, also their best interests weren't there when it come down to the matter of mobilizing the troops to start European conflict. The main countries involved in this were Russia and Austria-Hungary for the simple fact that they had troops already in the Balkans and were very much a major part in the running of Serbia and Bosnia respectively. Economic policy coincided with foreign policy and made the fact of going to war harder due to their establishment in the Balkans. Also the risk of going to war was far too great and many loses could have been made. Daniel Pearson History Essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.

  2. An assessment of the First Moroccan Crisis 1905-06, Bosnian Crisis 1908-09, Second ...

    The new liberal government (in power in 1906) perceived Germany then as a real threat. Britain's attempts to negotiate with Germany are dismissed and this pushes Britain towards France and Russia for allies even more than the Moroccan crisis already provoked. Britain is confused as to why Germany is building its army so vastly and assumes it must be for want of a war with Britain.)

  1. Dear Diary, It was the start of the Christmas month and I was ready ...

    steel pickets and rolls of wire. The pickets should be knocked into place by muffled mallets. When fastened to the pickets, the wire was pulled out to make what was known as an apron. That camp has taught me loads all of this I know already in my thick head.

  2. Historical significance of two world wars

    Both countries' industries and agriculture were declined as factories and farmlands had been destroyed. Industrial in Germany fell even sharply. Problems like the shortage of daily necessities, inflation and unemployment rate were serious in both countries. In Italy, there were more than two million returning soldiers were unemployed.

  1. "The FirstWorld War was the result of a Badly Mismanaged Balkan Crisis In The ...

    leave making Slav people leave the empire and forming a breakaway Slav state. This could break up the structure of the Austrian- Hungarian empire. The desire for land in the Balkans caused rivalry and built up tensions between the two nations.

  2. Did Serbia benefit from the Balkan Wars?

    The other three members of the Balkan League initiated military operations in those areas where they bordered Turkish controlled Europe: Serbia into Kosovo, along with the Morava and Upper Vardar Valleys, Bulgaria south into Thrace and the Maritsa Valley, and Greece north towards the citadel of Janina and northeast towards Salonika.

  1. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    preventing France from launching a war of revenge and able to keep the peace in Europe. In fact, another source of disruption of peace came from the conflicting interests between Russia and Austria, the two partners of Bismarck's alliances. By trying to keep both in his alliances, Bismarck had tried his best and successfully in restraining the two from war.(e.g.

  2. 'The rise and decline of the great powers can be explained by their relative ...

    This was due partially to the expense of war, but mainly to the reparations demanded by the Treaty of Versailles. This plummet in the economy caused mass unemployment, devaluation of currency and hardship nationwide. It also put a great strain on relations between Britain, Russia and France and Germany, as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work