• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Different Reactions Of People To The Policy Of Evacuating Children During The Second World War?

Extracts from this document...


Explain Different Reactions Of People To The Policy Of Evacuating Children During The Second World War? In 1939 the British government decided to evacuate as many children as possible from inner city areas and more specifically those from industrial cities or those with ports. The policy meant that those evacuated from these areas were sent instead to rural areas. The policy was implemented due to meant reasons, the main of which was the fear of heavy bombing from Germany. This policy of evacuation provoked many different reactions from different people, groups, classes and individuals. Although almost everyone living in the areas being evacuated had direct experience of the evacuation, those most affected were those actually being evacuated. This large amount of people consisted of 827,000 schoolchildren, 524,000 mothers and children under school age, 13,000 expectant mothers, 103,000 teachers and 7,000 handicapped people. ...read more.


There were a small number (relative to the amount of people evacuated) who were abused by those who took them in, mentally and physically. It is however, not known how many were abused as some are only beginning to talk of their experiences now. Some children that were sent away from inner cities and impoverished families found the country life a happy experience because once they had adapted to the lifestyle they found they were given as much food as they wanted. Also, the food and conditions were in some cases a lot better than those they left behind. In these cases, the evacuees responded well to the evacuation and adapted and enjoyed their time. A former evacuee, Michael Caine said, "I went on to enjoy my halcyon days over the next six years" about his stay on a farm in Norfolk. ...read more.


Some upper class children were unhappy with their evacuation because they were moved to homes much les civilised and well off than theirs, and this downgrade in living standards caused some resentment toward the policy of evacuation in Britain. This could not be said for all upper class children as some, like their lower class counterparts, adapted well to evacuation and others did not. Stereotypes cannot be put on classes and ages of evacuees, and their reactions to evacuation because it is a more complex and individual issue as to their reaction to the policy of evacuation. It is fair to say that from all the different lasses and ages of those evacuated, some reactions were good and some bad. However some reactions are not known to this day, because some are only just beginning to speak on the subject of their experiences as those who were abused. Tom Murphy ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. In what ways were people's lives affected by evacuation during the second world war?

    and the majority had it in their hair and the others had dirty sores all over their bodies" "Many of the mothers and Children were bed wetter's." Some of the evacuees arrived in appalling condition with ragged, dirty clothes and sometimes not even a whole pair of shoes.

  2. Evacuation in Britain during the Second World War

    of stereotyping evacuees - "We were not all raised on a diet of fish and chips eaten from newspaper." So evacuation was unsuccessful as many hosts got a stereotypical view of children from the city from evacuation, which was not always correct.

  1. Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain(TM)s major cities in ...

    These airbases were closer to Britain than the airbases in Germany. This meant that British cities were in range of the Luftwaffe making them more likely to succeed with bombings. The south was most at risk as it was closest to the English Channel which was the only thing separating Britain from the Luftwaffe.

  2. Explain the Differing Reactions of People in Britain to the Policy of Evacuating Children ...

    Whilst the majority of middle-class children placed with a middle-class family would find the evacuation pleasant, the real clash in personalities was if a middle-class child was placed with a working-class family. Source F shows this clash when a former evacuee states that it was upsetting "for a clean and well-educated child to find itself in a grubby semi-slum".

  1. Assimilation. The problem with immigration in Britain was that the people werent coming from ...

    This dealt a serious blow to the success of assimilation. Britain's poor white population was a target of false propaganda and politicians like Enoch Powell persuaded them that immigrants were the cause for their problems. Enoch Powell's river of blood speech was recently used by the BNP a racist group who doesn't believe in immigrants and assimilation.

  2. Explain the differencing reactions /feelings of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating ...

    They forgot what it was like to live only for your children, not to have time for them anymore when they had several years of doing as they pleased and working for themselves. Fathers of evacuees would mainly be at war or working in the fields, mines etc but when they returned they didn't need to worry about their children.

  1. Explain the different reactions of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating children ...

    Arriving from the dirty cities, many children were full of lice and were "sewn into their ragged little garments," making many of the higher society families wary of looking after them. Children of the foster families who already lived in the country and who were forced to have evacuees living alongside them didn't react graciously towards them.

  2. The Impact of the Second World War on a London Borough: Bexley 1939-1945

    By reading these two different accounts you can tell that although the first reporter would like to think he is doing something positive for his community, he is actually feeling negative about his actions and thinking that whatever he did would not have been any help in making the community a safer place.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work