• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Bloody Sunday created a bigger argument between two clashing communities

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ireland coursework Q2 One of the most memorable events in Irish history, providing a torrent of conflict and on-going arguments between nationalists and unionists, was an event named "Bloody Sunday." In an attempt to avoid further conflict following the partition of Ireland, many marches were made illegal by the Special Powers act. This meant that when civil rights groups wanted to protest about issues such as internment (people going straight to prison without a trial), it was difficult to express their views. However, in 1972, local MP of Derry, Ivan Cooper, organized a civil rights march against internment. Cooper and others believed it was unfair that Nationalists were treated like second class citizens in Northern Ireland, and decided the best way to get the Governments attention was to take part in a march. It took place on Sunday 30th January 1972, and by the end of the day 13 civilians were shot dead, by British army bullets. Months later a victim died from his injuries, making 14 deaths. ...read more.

Middle

This meant that Nationalists could not put forward their views as the Government would not let them. Even now, historians are trying to put together what really happened on Bloody Sunday, but there have been many sources explaining what they thought had happened. It is believed that the British government had let the march go unchallenged, but that the marchers must not be allowed outside the Catholic Bogside area. Barriers were put up so the marchers would keep within the Bogside. The 1st Parachute Regiment, or mainly known as 1 Para, were there to deal with any violent rioters. A very famous source was a Catholic Priest, Father Bradley. In source I, talking about the start of the shooting he stated that "they shot indiscriminately" [without choosing targets] and that he saw "only the Army shooting." Also several of the people in the march were shot in the back; this means that the army shot people who were fleeing the scene; people who were not fighting against them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Bloody Sunday was a huge catastrophe, which brought to attention the awful way the British Government handled situations and also brought to light the horrible ways in which nationalists were treated. Because of this scandal, the failure and hatred of the British Government would me passed down throughout generations of nationalists, and even now there are still reports looking in to what exactly happened on Bloody Sunday. The Widgery report was a white-wash - A report that looked into Bloody Sunday and what occurred, and who was to blame, left only a small amount of time to examine the evidence, and reported that the army were not seen as responsible. Because of this report there was no chance ever of justice for the Nationalists. The Nationalists grew increasingly angry with the British Government and passing down the hatred through generations meant that now in Northern Ireland today, people are still fighting against the British Government - you couldn't work with a government that had treated your community badly in the past - and they still have a need for justice and for closure today. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Sunday January On 30, 1972, in an incident since known as Bloody Sunday, twenty-seven ...

    On the 24th January 1972Frabk Lagan the Chief superintendent of the RUC told Andrew Maclellan the commander 8 infantry brigade, that he had spoken to the civil rights association and told them that he wanted to hold a non-violent demonstration protesting against internment on 30 January 1972.

  2. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    According to the British Army evidence, 21 soldiers fired their weapons on 'Bloody Sunday' and shot 108 rounds in total. [Most of the basic facts are agreed, however what remains in dispute is whether or not the soldiers came under fire as they entered the area of Rossville Flats.

  1. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    Again, another facet which is helping the peace process with the last British elections, which occurred in May of 1997, when Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness were elected. These are the two people at the heart of the Republican peace process.

  2. Peace and Justice (corrymela)

    outside, whilst the inside is run by the prisoners like a small town. 11) How are the Churches perceived today in El Salvador? Archbishop Oscar Romero identified with the poor, and so now the churches are perceived in a more positive light.

  1. bloody sunday assignment 1

    Their security and prosperity lied with the United Kingdom. But the Catholics were the exact opposite as they believed they could only achieve this by gaining some degree of independence from the United Kingdom. But this was all put aside as the First World War started in 1914; Ireland and Britain were to fight beside each other.

  2. bloody sunday assignment 2

    It goes onto tell us that "the facts about Bloody Sunday" have been "covered up". This source works strongly from the Catholic interpretation of what happened, which may be because the New Communist Party was violently opposed to the British Army being in Northern Ireland.

  1. What Happened at Sharpeville on 21st March 1960?Massacre or Self-Defence?

    Both sources appear to share the same points of view about the shootings at Sharpeville. They agree that the demonstrators were not armed with "ferocious weapons" and that the police opened fire without provocation. However, the reliability of Source E could also be questioned, which prevents it from being able to verify any other source.

  2. How valuable are sources 1,5,6,7,8,9 in explaining the events of bloody Sunday?

    The statement comes from a Priest, and therefore should have integrity, however the priest is a Catholic and may by biased towards the nationalist perspective. Whatever his belief, what he saw on the day would have been limited; he was only in one small area on the day and therefore could not have seen everything that happened.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work