• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Bloody Sunday created a bigger argument between two clashing communities

Extracts from this document...


Ireland coursework Q2 One of the most memorable events in Irish history, providing a torrent of conflict and on-going arguments between nationalists and unionists, was an event named "Bloody Sunday." In an attempt to avoid further conflict following the partition of Ireland, many marches were made illegal by the Special Powers act. This meant that when civil rights groups wanted to protest about issues such as internment (people going straight to prison without a trial), it was difficult to express their views. However, in 1972, local MP of Derry, Ivan Cooper, organized a civil rights march against internment. Cooper and others believed it was unfair that Nationalists were treated like second class citizens in Northern Ireland, and decided the best way to get the Governments attention was to take part in a march. It took place on Sunday 30th January 1972, and by the end of the day 13 civilians were shot dead, by British army bullets. Months later a victim died from his injuries, making 14 deaths. ...read more.


This meant that Nationalists could not put forward their views as the Government would not let them. Even now, historians are trying to put together what really happened on Bloody Sunday, but there have been many sources explaining what they thought had happened. It is believed that the British government had let the march go unchallenged, but that the marchers must not be allowed outside the Catholic Bogside area. Barriers were put up so the marchers would keep within the Bogside. The 1st Parachute Regiment, or mainly known as 1 Para, were there to deal with any violent rioters. A very famous source was a Catholic Priest, Father Bradley. In source I, talking about the start of the shooting he stated that "they shot indiscriminately" [without choosing targets] and that he saw "only the Army shooting." Also several of the people in the march were shot in the back; this means that the army shot people who were fleeing the scene; people who were not fighting against them. ...read more.


Bloody Sunday was a huge catastrophe, which brought to attention the awful way the British Government handled situations and also brought to light the horrible ways in which nationalists were treated. Because of this scandal, the failure and hatred of the British Government would me passed down throughout generations of nationalists, and even now there are still reports looking in to what exactly happened on Bloody Sunday. The Widgery report was a white-wash - A report that looked into Bloody Sunday and what occurred, and who was to blame, left only a small amount of time to examine the evidence, and reported that the army were not seen as responsible. Because of this report there was no chance ever of justice for the Nationalists. The Nationalists grew increasingly angry with the British Government and passing down the hatred through generations meant that now in Northern Ireland today, people are still fighting against the British Government - you couldn't work with a government that had treated your community badly in the past - and they still have a need for justice and for closure today. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Sunday January On 30, 1972, in an incident since known as Bloody Sunday, twenty-seven ...

    On the 24th January 1972Frabk Lagan the Chief superintendent of the RUC told Andrew Maclellan the commander 8 infantry brigade, that he had spoken to the civil rights association and told them that he wanted to hold a non-violent demonstration protesting against internment on 30 January 1972.

  2. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    According to the British Army evidence, 21 soldiers fired their weapons on 'Bloody Sunday' and shot 108 rounds in total. [Most of the basic facts are agreed, however what remains in dispute is whether or not the soldiers came under fire as they entered the area of Rossville Flats.

  1. The build up to Bloody Sunday, and why it happened.

    His quickly-produced report supported the army analysis of the events of the day, to the extent of implying on the basis of scientific evidence that some of those shot had handled explosives.

  2. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    That those parties outside the talks in Northern Ireland, and there are two, will be able to whip up fears in the larger community so that the Ulster Unionist party won't have the confidence to continue. So, either it's going to be as a result of historic mistrust or short-term political gain.

  1. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    The historian could use both of these sources together to get a more accurate impression of the marchers and how they felt before and on 'Bloody Sunday'. c) Study source E Source E must be reliable because it is an eyewitness account.

  2. Northern Ireland - Bloody Sunday.

    In 1985 the Anglo-Irish Agreement tried to involve Southern Ireland in tackling the problem, however, this also dissatisfied the Protestants - they saw no reason why the South should get involved. In 1993 the Downing Street agreement was made and London and Dublin started to work closer together.

  1. How useful are sources A, B, C and D to someone trying to find ...

    It clearly supports the army's version of events. It says that the soldiers only acted on instructions and only fired when once they had been shot at themselves. If they did fire, it was in accordance with their orders. There is muted criticism, however.

  2. How valuable are sources 1,5,6,7,8,9 in explaining the events of bloody Sunday?

    Source 8 is taken from the report into Bloody Sunday by Lord Widgery. The source states the Paras acted responsibly and there was no breakdown in discipline, However, Widgery goes on to say, "Firing bordered on reckless." The Paratroopers are an elite fighting unit trained in not only the firing of weapons but also in the control of said fire.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work