Explain how far Nicholas II was to blame for March 1917 revolution.

Authors Avatar

Explain how far Nicholas II was to blame for March 1917 revolution.

Nicholas was mostly responsible for his own downfall in 1917. He created so many problems for himself and the country; it was no surprise that in the end his people turned against him.

   

One of the most unintelligent things the Tsar did was taking charge of the Russian army in September 1915. Therefore, all the defeats Russia suffered in the First World War were the Tsar’s fault. Being leader of the army meant that he had to leave home and leave all his power to his wife, Alexandra. This was a big mistake, because she was unpopular and incompetent. Being inexperienced, Alexandra turned to Rasputin for help, which meant that Rasputin was ruling Russia through her. Russia was very unsuccessful during the war, partly because Rasputin was involved in the sacking of some of Russia’s most experienced ministers. Also in conversations with the tsar she lied telling him all was well in Russia, she did not want him worrying on the front line.

Join now!

   

Another reason why Russia was unsuccessful in the war was because there weren’t enough weapons, so soldiers fought with whatever they could find. For example, they would use a brick or a plank of wood if they were lucky. They were told to pick up there comrades rifle if he died.

   

However, Russia’s prime minister at this time was Stolypin and he could have made things better for Russia and the Tsar’s reputation. He had the idea of creating a rich peasant which he called a “Kulak”. As a result of this more peasants would ...

This is a preview of the whole essay