• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how far Nicholas II was to blame for March 1917 revolution.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how far Nicholas II was to blame for March 1917 revolution. Nicholas was mostly responsible for his own downfall in 1917. He created so many problems for himself and the country; it was no surprise that in the end his people turned against him. One of the most unintelligent things the Tsar did was taking charge of the Russian army in September 1915. Therefore, all the defeats Russia suffered in the First World War were the Tsar's fault. Being leader of the army meant that he had to leave home and leave all his power to his wife, Alexandra. This was a big mistake, because she was unpopular and incompetent. Being inexperienced, Alexandra turned to Rasputin for help, which meant that Rasputin was ruling Russia through her. Russia was very unsuccessful during the war, partly because Rasputin was involved in the sacking of some of Russia's most experienced ministers. Also in conversations with the tsar she lied telling him all was well in Russia, she did not want him worrying on the front line. ...read more.

Middle

As a result of the 1905 revolution, the Tsar gave the people a Duma. This was basically a government set up for the people to share their views which was a good move from the Tsar considering that the opposition was forever growing bigger against him. It also helped the Tsar because Russia was too big for one person to rule. On the other hand, the Tsar disagreed with some of the suggestions that were made by the Duma and he kept closing them down. The Tsar was not entirely to blame for the March 1917 revolution because the actions of Rasputin, "the Mad Monk" also contributed to its rising. As we know he controlled Russia through Alexandra, and this was beginning to ruin the Royal family's popularity. Rasputin's behaviour outside the walls of the palace was really damaging their reputation. He was a drunk who used prostitute's right under the watchful eye of the public. ...read more.

Conclusion

All this was a result of food shortages. This was because peasants who worked in the fields were taken out to fight in the war. As a result no food was being grown and all the food that was being transported was left at train stations and rotted because there wasn't a direct train route from the farms to the city. As we can see Nicholas's future as a Tsar looked bleak and it was predictable that his own people would turn against him in the end. I think his biggest downfall was taking charge of the army, because he was inexperienced and incompetent as a leader. The Russian army were very unsuccessful in the war, so all the defeats they suffered were the Tsar's fault which made him unpopular. Nevertheless, he did have some bright spells and knew opportunities to make him popular again. For example, Stolypin's idea of a rich peasant would have boosted his status as a Tsar again. Overall, I think the Tsar should have listened to his people more and gained more knowledge about their desires and opinions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    were critics of the Tsar and Nicholas was not comfortable with this political situation. Nicholas made sure the Duma would have very little power. Two months after the elections were held Nicholas issued a set of fundamental laws; that gave him total control once again.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    strike became more political as they voiced their opinions about the Tsar. Source D is an extract from the diary of a British nurse who was working in Petrograd in 1917. This source gives us an accurate account of what happened on the 26th February.

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    In October, a general strike spread from Moscow to other cities. All opposition groups were united in demanding changes. On 26th October, the St Petersburg Soviet of Workers' Deputies was formed. Representatives from factories met to organise the strike action.

  2. Tsar Nicholas II

    This affected Tsar Nicholas as he lost popularity and Stolypin had ultimately showed Russia that the Tsar was not doing all that he entirely could be doing in order to improve his empire, although Nicholas did realise that Stolypin's work was very helpful after the assassination, as he begged for forgiveness beside Stolypin's death bed.

  1. The February Revolution 1917 - Was Nicholas responsible for his own downfall?

    thinks that the strikes are not serious and everything will die down in time. However her and therefore the Tsar are obviously wrong because looking at other point of view from that time, revolution is quite likely. The next reason is the fact that the soldiers have begun to mutiny.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    However, through a combination of political scheming and working against the mistakes of his opponents Stalin raised his profile from an insignificant person to the leader of the USSR. His character of deception is clearly shown when he deceived Trotsky at the time of Lenin's funeral and informed him to come on a different day to the funeral.

  1. Causes of the Revolution of March1917 / Downfall of the Tsar

    as well because of the war the general public in Russia had shortages of food, fuel and other necessities. In result of the war, many people in the villages and cities became unhappy. The main problem was, however, that there was enough food and fuel but getting it to the cities became a huge problem.

  2. Long and short-term causes contributed to the March 1917 Revolution.

    Industrialisation caused a great increase in the number of workers, but this also created miserable working conditions and living conditions. A great deal is discussed over why a revolution did not occur during his reign, but Nicholas II (his son)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work