• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how far Nicholas II was to blame for March 1917 revolution.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how far Nicholas II was to blame for March 1917 revolution. Nicholas was mostly responsible for his own downfall in 1917. He created so many problems for himself and the country; it was no surprise that in the end his people turned against him. One of the most unintelligent things the Tsar did was taking charge of the Russian army in September 1915. Therefore, all the defeats Russia suffered in the First World War were the Tsar's fault. Being leader of the army meant that he had to leave home and leave all his power to his wife, Alexandra. This was a big mistake, because she was unpopular and incompetent. Being inexperienced, Alexandra turned to Rasputin for help, which meant that Rasputin was ruling Russia through her. Russia was very unsuccessful during the war, partly because Rasputin was involved in the sacking of some of Russia's most experienced ministers. Also in conversations with the tsar she lied telling him all was well in Russia, she did not want him worrying on the front line. ...read more.

Middle

As a result of the 1905 revolution, the Tsar gave the people a Duma. This was basically a government set up for the people to share their views which was a good move from the Tsar considering that the opposition was forever growing bigger against him. It also helped the Tsar because Russia was too big for one person to rule. On the other hand, the Tsar disagreed with some of the suggestions that were made by the Duma and he kept closing them down. The Tsar was not entirely to blame for the March 1917 revolution because the actions of Rasputin, "the Mad Monk" also contributed to its rising. As we know he controlled Russia through Alexandra, and this was beginning to ruin the Royal family's popularity. Rasputin's behaviour outside the walls of the palace was really damaging their reputation. He was a drunk who used prostitute's right under the watchful eye of the public. ...read more.

Conclusion

All this was a result of food shortages. This was because peasants who worked in the fields were taken out to fight in the war. As a result no food was being grown and all the food that was being transported was left at train stations and rotted because there wasn't a direct train route from the farms to the city. As we can see Nicholas's future as a Tsar looked bleak and it was predictable that his own people would turn against him in the end. I think his biggest downfall was taking charge of the army, because he was inexperienced and incompetent as a leader. The Russian army were very unsuccessful in the war, so all the defeats they suffered were the Tsar's fault which made him unpopular. Nevertheless, he did have some bright spells and knew opportunities to make him popular again. For example, Stolypin's idea of a rich peasant would have boosted his status as a Tsar again. Overall, I think the Tsar should have listened to his people more and gained more knowledge about their desires and opinions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    were critics of the Tsar and Nicholas was not comfortable with this political situation. Nicholas made sure the Duma would have very little power. Two months after the elections were held Nicholas issued a set of fundamental laws; that gave him total control once again.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    strike became more political as they voiced their opinions about the Tsar. Source D is an extract from the diary of a British nurse who was working in Petrograd in 1917. This source gives us an accurate account of what happened on the 26th February.

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    In June, sailors of the battleship Potemkin mutinied. This was rather worrying event for the government, for it was easy for ideas to spread in armies and there were possibilities that other sections of the army might also mutiny. By May and June, different groups were demanding changes.

  2. The February Revolution 1917 - Was Nicholas responsible for his own downfall?

    thinks that the strikes are not serious and everything will die down in time. However her and therefore the Tsar are obviously wrong because looking at other point of view from that time, revolution is quite likely. The next reason is the fact that the soldiers have begun to mutiny.

  1. Tsar Nicholas II

    It also made the country difficult to govern because after people found about the massacre, disorder and looting occurred. This is a short term cause that made the Russian empire very difficult to run, but it would not have affected any previous Tsars.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    No one will help you if you yourselves do not unite and take into your hands all affairs of state´┐Ż Get on with the job yourselves; begin right at the bottom, do not wait for anyone." (LCW, Vol. 26, p.

  1. How far was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    The war lead to food shortages and unemployment, this would have happened whoever was in charge of Russia but due to the poor organisation these problems became worse and worse and the Tsar's downfall looked more likely. Nicholas' unpopular decision to leave Petrograd leaving the Tsarina and Rasputin in charge

  2. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    This meant that the people of Russia could not afford essential goods because the increase in their wages could not keep up with the increase in prices. Therefore, the state of the economy and its effect on the people of Russia, like the food shortages and the rationing, also drove

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work