• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how far Nicholas II was to blame for March 1917 revolution.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how far Nicholas II was to blame for March 1917 revolution. Nicholas was mostly responsible for his own downfall in 1917. He created so many problems for himself and the country; it was no surprise that in the end his people turned against him. One of the most unintelligent things the Tsar did was taking charge of the Russian army in September 1915. Therefore, all the defeats Russia suffered in the First World War were the Tsar's fault. Being leader of the army meant that he had to leave home and leave all his power to his wife, Alexandra. This was a big mistake, because she was unpopular and incompetent. Being inexperienced, Alexandra turned to Rasputin for help, which meant that Rasputin was ruling Russia through her. Russia was very unsuccessful during the war, partly because Rasputin was involved in the sacking of some of Russia's most experienced ministers. Also in conversations with the tsar she lied telling him all was well in Russia, she did not want him worrying on the front line. ...read more.

Middle

As a result of the 1905 revolution, the Tsar gave the people a Duma. This was basically a government set up for the people to share their views which was a good move from the Tsar considering that the opposition was forever growing bigger against him. It also helped the Tsar because Russia was too big for one person to rule. On the other hand, the Tsar disagreed with some of the suggestions that were made by the Duma and he kept closing them down. The Tsar was not entirely to blame for the March 1917 revolution because the actions of Rasputin, "the Mad Monk" also contributed to its rising. As we know he controlled Russia through Alexandra, and this was beginning to ruin the Royal family's popularity. Rasputin's behaviour outside the walls of the palace was really damaging their reputation. He was a drunk who used prostitute's right under the watchful eye of the public. ...read more.

Conclusion

All this was a result of food shortages. This was because peasants who worked in the fields were taken out to fight in the war. As a result no food was being grown and all the food that was being transported was left at train stations and rotted because there wasn't a direct train route from the farms to the city. As we can see Nicholas's future as a Tsar looked bleak and it was predictable that his own people would turn against him in the end. I think his biggest downfall was taking charge of the army, because he was inexperienced and incompetent as a leader. The Russian army were very unsuccessful in the war, so all the defeats they suffered were the Tsar's fault which made him unpopular. Nevertheless, he did have some bright spells and knew opportunities to make him popular again. For example, Stolypin's idea of a rich peasant would have boosted his status as a Tsar again. Overall, I think the Tsar should have listened to his people more and gained more knowledge about their desires and opinions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    were critics of the Tsar and Nicholas was not comfortable with this political situation. Nicholas made sure the Duma would have very little power. Two months after the elections were held Nicholas issued a set of fundamental laws; that gave him total control once again.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    Historically Source B is more accurate and therefore more trustworthy. c) Study sources A, B, C and D. Does the evidence of Source C and D support the version of evidence given in Source A or in Source B? Source C is a table of the estimated workers on strike in Petrograd in late February 1917.

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    For the rest of the year, strikes, demonstrations, petitions, peasant uprisings, student riots and assassinations became rather common in Russia. On 4th February, the Tsar's uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei, was assassinated in Moscow. In June, sailors of the battleship Potemkin mutinied.

  2. What were the causes of the March 1917 Revolution?

    The war had a massive impact because it drained the cities of all its finances and it supplies. Nothing was left for civilians and so they had nothing left to loose when they started the revolution. People were also annoyed that the Tsar had deserted them to fight in the

  1. Long and short-term causes contributed to the March 1917 Revolution.

    There were the socialist revolutionaries, social democrats (Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks) and the liberals. They all had one thing in common; they wanted to overthrow the Tsar. Between all the groups they had a large following, and it was just a matter of time until the sparks of revolution flew.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    for a revolutionary overturn in order to conquer peace, bread and land. This could only be achieved by a revolutionary alliance with the proletariat. The realisation of this fact was registered in the Soviet elections by a sharp swing to the left.

  1. How far was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    The war lead to food shortages and unemployment, this would have happened whoever was in charge of Russia but due to the poor organisation these problems became worse and worse and the Tsar's downfall looked more likely. Nicholas' unpopular decision to leave Petrograd leaving the Tsarina and Rasputin in charge

  2. Russian Revolution in March 1917.

    (2) Short-term and long-term causes contributed to the revolution. Mutiny in the army, food shortages and discontent among the people, witch led to strikes were some of them. Mutiny in the army and food shortages were short-term causes of the revolution in 1917 but discontent among the people were long terms building up long ago, even from the start of Nicolas II, regime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work