• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Stalin was able to hold on to power in the Soviet Union.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework part 2: Explain how Stalin was able to hold on to power in the Soviet Union Stalin was able to hold onto his power as leader of the Soviet Union for a substantial amount of time. There were a number of contributing factors which enabled him to do so, each equally helping Stalin to control the country, A variety of political methods were some of the means available to him and he took full advantage of these in order to stay in control. The purges and show trials was definitely factors that were inaugural in keeping Stalin in power and helping him in keeping his country under control. One of Stalin's aim was to control his people to such an extent that they would be afraid to even think of opposing him. The purges were definitely one way of keeping the country under control. They began in 1934, when Segei Kirov, the leader of the Leningrad and a potential rival was murdered. ...read more.

Middle

In the 1930's, the average citizen would admire Stalin. This continued with education, where schoolchildren would be indoctrinated with Stalinist propaganda. There were statues and portraits everywhere. Stalin used propaganda to censor opposition such as writers and artists whom he deemed as "dangerous." He censored writers' books and articles before they were released. He demanded that artists produced work which glorified his achievements, exaggerating his successes and therefore being blatant propaganda. Propaganda was an important reason in Stalin keeping control because it helped the image of Stalinism. Stalin was being portrayed as an almighty hero and the propaganda was the instigator. The propaganda and the cult of personality also link to collectivisation and the invaluable contribution of the five-year plans. This is because they were all forms of Stalin trying to keep control of his country. The whole principle of the five-year plans was to modernise Russia. For these five-year plans to be success full, Stalin needed to modernise Russia's agriculture, this was vital because the population of the industrial centres were growing rapidly. ...read more.

Conclusion

Rationing was introduced and safety standards began to be ignored. However, the plans undoubtedly transformed Russia from the backward agricultural nation it was into modernised state. Collectivisation and the five-year plans coincided to help Stalin stay in power as he had achieved what he set out to do and many people praised him because of it. Overall, I feel that the reasons for why Stalin was able to hold on to power in the Soviet Union are equally important as they all link together and if one did not happen the others would not have taken place. They all played an adamant part in Stalin holding on to power. The purges and show trials were instigated with the secret police and were both vital in helping Stalin remove opposition. The show trials and the police were widely publicised and were part of the huge propaganda campaign which Stalin used to portray himself as a god-like character, exaggerating and glorifying his achievements. Stalin was praised for the work he had achieved and had it not been for the reasons above all playing their part, Stalin may never had stayed in power of the Soviet Union for the amount of time that he did. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    farmers would be able to keep more crops themselves and would make more money from selling it. During the 1930's living standards rose. As many people in Russia were moved into new houses and flats, their lives were greatly improved as it made them a lot more comfortable and they all had running water, heating etc.

  2. Stalin and the Five Year Plans

    Many workers died whilst building industrial plants, mines or other buildings wanted by the government. Although when they were built they were successful, hundreds, probably thousands of workers died during the construction periods. In conclusion, it has to be said that there were probably more things that brought miserly to the Russian people than there were to bring them comfort.

  1. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    The Communist Party was still supposed to be a family of comrades. And still in the Party, or readmitted to the Party, were some of Stalin's former opponents, the so-called Rightists, Bukharin, Tomsky and Rykov, and the so-called Leftists, the humbled Zinoviev, Kamenev and others of the old "United Opposition."

  2. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    In 1928 there was a population of 70 million cattle in Russia, in 1933 it was 38 million. The pig population fell from 26 million to 12 million and the sheep population fell from 146 million to 50 million. The Soviet Union was unable to get over these tremendous losses until the 1950s.

  1. Was terror the main reason why Stalin kept power in the Soviet Union?

    This was a subtle approach because Stalin was educating them in communism even though they did not know. Another thing is they could not do anything about it because they were forced to go to school and if they did not they would probably be arrested by the Secret Police.

  2. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    Also, Stalin's daughter commented that he was "lonely" and "isolated". From this I can draw a similar conclusion that in fact Stalin conducted the Purges due to his own personal insecurities. From this I can conclude that Lenin was much more cautious in how he conserved Land, whereas Stalin was prepared to annoy others to achieve his goals.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Inevitably, the Second Five Year Plans enhanced the achievements of its predecessor. As well as boosting the heavy industries to such an extent that the production of electricity and steel nearly trebled from 13.4 million tons and 5.9 million tons in 1933 when the First Five Year Program was concluding

  2. Why was Stalin able to hold on to power in the Soviet Union?

    He secretly ordered Yagoda, head of the NKVD, to have Kirov murdered. When this was done, Stalin used it as an excuse to turn on his enemies. Zinoviev, Kamenev and others were accused of being involved with the murder. They were arrested, put on trail and in January 1935 sentenced to long gaol terms.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work