• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain How the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment 1.1 - Explain How the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work The Schlieffen plan was a unique strategy designed so the Germans could defeat their two major enemies, France and Russia, without being severely incapacitated themselves. This could be achieved by attacking and defeating France within 6 weeks and then attacking Russia and thus avoiding a war on two fronts, which is what every dominant power fears. Although Britain was in the triple entente along with France and Russia, it was only the powers encircling Germany that frightened it. They knew they always faced a war with France after Germany had "snatched" the rich provinces of Alsace and Lorraine in 1870, leaving France humiliated after an unsuspected invasion. They were also worried about the Franco - Russian alliance (1892-4), which stated that one should come to the aid of another if it was attacked and vice - versa. ...read more.

Middle

The original plan consisted of both a left and a right wing, with a ratio of 7:1 in favour of the right wing. This "pincer" movement was based upon General Hannibal's winning tactics at Cannae in 216BC. The same original plan included 8 armies. The first 3 were to enter France through Belgium, and another 2 were to go via Luxembourg to gain a surprise entry, with maybe an army going through Holland, which they would decide on a later date. These 5 armies consisted of 68 divisions. 59 divisions were to come from the north and the remaining 9 were to penetrate from the south. Armies 1 and 2 were specifically instructed to take Paris with Von Kluck leading the first and Von Bulow leading the second. Armies 6 and 7 were situated in Alsace and Lorraine, where it was thought would be the most likely place for a French advance. ...read more.

Conclusion

This could hinder their progress, which was a severe disadvantage as it was vital that the French were defeated within 6 weeks or they would face what they had always feared. He also completely ruled out the option of going through Holland stating that invading a third neutral country would present more problems and resistance, as well as more fatigue for the soldiers who would have to march further as a result. Also they needed a neutral country with a port, which they could bribe to smuggle in food in the event of a British naval objective attempting to starve Germany into surrender. However this led to congestion on the railways, which in turn warned the French they were coming. The Schlieffen plan was a complete gamble, no evidence Schlieffen had used was reliable in the slightest and he had completely undermined the importance of several key things. His intentions of only fighting the French for 6 weeks very quickly spiralled into 4 years. ?? ?? ?? ?? Dominic McGrath 5MAW ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The Battle of Verdun.

    These orders were followed, the French dug in, the fact that strong points were not being abandoned meant hat the German advance was at first slowed and then halted by the French, and now the real battle of attrition started.

  2. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    support to the Allies by sea power and a limited number of men on land. However, this was a long term strategy and would take approximately 2 years to start having an effect. Britain's resistance at Mons was unexpected, as was the quick mobilisation of Russian forces; to which the

  1. Free essay

    Explain how the Schlieffen plan was meant to work. How did it end ...

    Falkenhayns defensive strategy brought him into conflict with Hindenburg and Ludendorff who preferred a more offensive and outgoing method.

  2. Trench Diary Assignment.

    I was instructed to do sentry duty, Tom who was also in the same trench as me was cleaning the weapons. That night, some of our troops were sleeping; I still had to fulfil my task. You could still hear the deafening sound of shells.

  1. Failure of the Schlieffen Plan.

    He ordered a retreat, obliging Kluck to do the same. The counterattack of the French 5th and 6th Armies and the BEF developed into the First Battle of the Marne, a general counter-attack by the French Army. By 11 September the Germans were in full retreat.

  2. Schlieffen Plan

    The British and French armies deployed their troops separately, not as a unified command, with the British just north of the River Somme and the French to the south. Von Moltke was destroyed by the Battle of the Marne and was replaced with Erich von Falkenhayn in December 1914 as the German commander.

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work.

    He was, however, very wrong. Germany invaded Luxemburg and Belgium on 2nd August, 1914. Britain had signed a treaty in 1839 with Belgium agreeing to protect it as a neutral country. Therefore, when Belgium refused to let the Germans through to attack France they put up a fight with the help of the British Expeditionary Force and held up Germany in the Battle of Mons.

  2. Explain how Moltke modified the Schlieffen Plan.

    Therefore this source is neither relevant nor useful. It could have actually worked though if they had actually stuck to the original plan but instead Moltke rapidly changed it. Source B is once again, a map and therefore it doesn't really show any fact or clarity. This map is that of the one that Moltke amended.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work