• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain How The Schlieffen Plan Was Meant To Work

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain How The Schlieffen Plan Was Meant To Work Britain and France signed the Entente Cordiale (friendly understanding) during 1904. Germany was seen as a perceived threat so consequently Britain and France wished to have higher levels of co-operation with her. Negotiations had also begun to arise to accumulate Russia with this alliance; the German military began to expect an attack from these three powers, which is what led to the decision of the Schlieffen Plan. Alfred von Schlieffen, German Army Chief of Staff, was appointed to start devising a strategy, with an objective that would prevent Germany fighting a war on two fronts in December 1905. This preceded the Dual Entente that was agreed between France and Russia that meant if a stronger power invaded one of them; the other in turn would join the war with their counterpart. Due to this Germany felt encircled, and they believed the way to win a war on two fronts was to defeat one of them first, not simultaneously. This power was to be France, as Germany knew that Russia would take about six weeks to mobilise all of their troops. This was crucial, as it should give them just enough time to conquer France to then direct their attention to the Eastern Front before Russia could react. Russia's inability to mobilise quickly was key to Schlieffen's Plan, the roots of this was due to the vast landscape throughout their country, but ...read more.

Middle

Schlieffen was inspired to do this by Hannibal's defeat of the Romans at the battle of Cannae in 216 BC where the inevitable tactic of 'manoeuvre sur la derriļæ½re' was implied. This was intended to move their main army corps around the back of the enemy to catch them unaware from behind and encircle them. Schlieffen aimed to use this tactic again to chase the French around Paris to meet the oncoming Germans that lay along the Alsace Lorraine border. Schlieffen laid out 37 1/2 of his divisions to control the decisive wing - the wing which would sweep down the western front and around the back of Paris. The other 4 divisions which complete Schlieffen's 471/2-division army would remain the pinning force around Alsace and Lorraine. The 37 1/2 divisions took the western front, Schlieffen knew exactly what he expected of these troops, as he knew what France was like due to spies but most of all previous wars including the Franco-Prussian war - Battle of Sedan in 1871, (this battle forced the French to give Alsace Lorraine to the Germans). As they passed the western wing they attempted to capture the main channel ports - Calais and Dover. If they did this the British Army would not have had much chance of crossing the channel to help the Belgians, capturing the central ports would also give the Germans great trade benefits. ...read more.

Conclusion

In doing so a 50 kilometre gap had expanded between 1st and 2nd German armies, this then allowed both the French and British forces to attack the Germans exposed flanks. Due to this endangerment of both 1st and 2nd armies, the forces were ordered to withdraw to the Aisne River to regroup. This then began the race to the sea, which was to control all the channel ports and outflank the other being the highlighted objectives. The French then turned their forces around to defend the Marne. Germans began to dig in to high ground beginning the start of trench warfare and ending the Schlieffen Plan. So overall the Germans partially managed to fight a war on one front first towards the beginning, but assumptions caused them to make wrong judgements. For example Russia took less time than expected to mobilise all their troops. That led to redeploying some of the German troops from the western front which in turn led that wing to be increasingly less powerful. Moving southeasterly along the western front caused the Germans to bypass Paris, which was a major blow as Paris was seen to be one of their main aims. This consequently led to the battle along the river Marne which was seen as the real turning point within the war, as neither side began to make ground. With Germans along the Marne and thousands over in Russia fighting at Tannenburg, the plan had not reached its main aims and objectives in order to make the French surrender. Will Beach 10J (JPS) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why did the Schlieffen Plan fail?

    I feel that the plan was too complex to actually succeed because there were also too many assumptions. The plan was very complicated, and relied on all of these assumptions to be correct. If one of them was wrong, then the whole plan could come crashing down amongst any general's ears.

  2. The Battle of Verdun.

    morale of the German army and hints at the casualties they were taking, this goes towards proving that the strategy was an error of judgement as the generals who decided upon it didn't realise that the casualties the Germans would have to take to inflict the wanted casualties on the French would greatly damage the morale of the German army.

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    Why did a Stalemate develop on the Western Front? The reasons why a stalemate developed on the Western Front are not standalone points but the combined efforts of all the reasons. Outside of battle, the main reason that contributed to a stalemate was that all of the countries battle plans failed.

  2. The Western Front

    next few days the Americans followed up their advantage, until they reached Sedan 7 Nov. The German centre was broken in the Battle of the Sambre from 1 Nov. By 9 Nov Maubeuge had fallen, Tournai was occupied the same day and early on 11 Nov the Canadians captured Mons.

  1. Free essay

    Explain how the Schlieffen plan was meant to work. How did it end ...

    One being that Belgium resistance was very strong. Even though Belgium was finally defeated, it took Germany almost a month to do so. This was far too long in contrast to what was expected in the schlieffen plan. Another reason for the failure of the schlieffen plan was that Russia

  2. Failure of the Schlieffen Plan.

    Occasionally, poison gas would be hurled ahead of them, but it would often blow back into their own faces. No more vicious or militarily ineffective method of slaughter could have been imagined. Throughout 1915, the French mounted a "war of attrition," a series of attacks at different points of the

  1. In February 1943, the German Army surrendered at Stalingrad, Was Hitlers interference the main ...

    This policy denied the Germans from using recourses that the Russians would leave behind on retreat. This also drew out the attack on Russia as with the time spent, the weather that would hold the Germans back was approaching. A further issue that caused Germans problems was that their tanks

  2. Schlieffen Plan

    It also planned to take France out the war quickly so Germany could face Russia with their entire army because Russia was so huge and also fairly inefficient as a country it meant that it would take a long time for Russia to mobilize her army.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work