• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework - World War One Depth Study 1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work? The main objective of the Schlieffen Plan was to stop Germany fighting two wars on two simultaneous fronts. At the time, Germany and her allies were surrounded by enemies. The two countries that encircled had an alliance: if one country went to war against Germany, the other would follow. If this happened, it would be a tactical disaster for Germany and so preventative measures were taken. It would be much better for the troops to fight one front and then travel to the other and fight there; this would be done by defeating France within 6 weeks and then fighting Russia later. The main bulk of German forces would march through the Ardennes and Belgium whilst a smaller task force would march westwards to Verdun, even though it was heavily fortified, and capture Paris in 6 weeks; just like the Franco-Prussian war of 1870. This plan was devised for 2 reasons. The first was that Germany thought that France would not expect a northerly attack and Belgium was neutral and would put up little resistance. Even though the Belgium terrain was difficult to march over, fewer men would be lost this way than having to fight around Verdun. France had the biggest army, the most money and the land in which the Western Front would be fought on. Allied troops also depended on France's involvement and therefore, being the bigger threat, she would be attacked first. Britain depended on France ports to send their troops through. If France fell, the British military could only be sent to Russian ports, which meant having to sail through or very near German waters. After defeating France, Germany would turn on Russia. She was attacked second as Germany saw Russia as inefficient and so would take a long time (approx 6 weeks) ...read more.


3. The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front was broken: New Technology American Entry War at Sea German Offensive of 1918 Explain how far you agree with this statement. World War One went on for much longer than anyone had ever imagined. People joined up because they didn't want to miss any action, thinking the war would be over by Christmas. Of course, by Christmas 1914, many knew that the war would last much longer than expected, and so the necessary preparations were made. However, by 1916, a stalemate had developed. Neither side had the tactical advantage but no-one wanted to surrender. There were many times during the war that this stalemate could have ended, but for whatever reasons, it didn't until the very end of the war. One invention that occurred during the war was the invention of the tank. The tank could carry 3 men inside and moved at 3mph. This was increased to 8 men and they were built with guns that could hold 13,000 bullets and fire up to 208 shells. The tank helped the Allied forces to advance on the Western Front by up to 30km, but this advantage was soon lost again. New artillery was invented which could fire over 13,000 m and high explosive shells were also invented which did more damage. Germany tried to copy the allied idea of the tank but it did not work, but their gun, "Big Bertha", could fire at Paris from over 120km away. More deadly grenades were used, which often contained deadly gasses (like Phosgene, Mustard or Chlorine) that incapacitated an enemy soldier. But technology behind the frontline was also revolutionized: transportation was upgraded, allowing more troops to be carried to the frontline in a much quicker time and radios were advancing, allowing for contact over greater distances. All of these advances helped to strengthen the attack, as troops could now attack with more power and in more deadly ways. ...read more.


They knew that millions of American troops would enter the war and their country could not sustain the blockade for much longer and so launched the offensive. With new weapons, tactics and troops from the Eastern Front, the offensive was successful as the frontline was re-drawn. This could not be upheld (due to looting of British supplies [slowing the offensive] and being too far ahead of the backup) and so the offensive ground to a halt. Then, in the 100 days after the offensive, the British made some remarkable tactical victories that eventually resulted in the allied victory of the war. None of these reasons are greater than the others as they are all inter-dependant. Nevertheless, in conclusion, I think that the American entry into the war was the most important factor that broke the stalemate. Without American aid, the blockade on German supplies would not have worked as well as it did and Germany may have been able to hold out for longer or not have broken the stalemate. Nevertheless, America would not have entered without the sinking of the Lusitania or the unrestricted U-boat campaign. If America had not entered, then Germany might not have launched the Spring Offensive and the offensive might not have worked without the use of superior weaponry. Of course, without the American entry, British morale would not have been boosted and the offensive may have entirely obliterated the British Defence and break the front line. The American brought in new equipment, men and supplies that enabled the Allies to push back the Germans to the Hindenburg line. The tanks were improved and weaponry more advanced which allowed the British to take the tactical advantage that they had lacked which brought them into a stalemate. By November 11th, all of Germany's allies had surrendered, sailors mutinied and crowds marched through the streets of Berlin, demanding an end to the war. The Kaiser had fled and the government collapsed. An emergency government was formed and immediately asked for a ceasefire. ?? ?? ?? ?? History Coursework - WWI Page 1 of 10 Denis Twomey 10J 13/10/2008 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. World War 1 - Breaking of the Stalemate

    The first tank was used by the British in the Battle of the Somme. It was nicknamed 'Little Willie'; it could carry 3 men in cramped conditions, and travel at 2 mph on the rough terrain of the battlefield.

  2. How Important was the Role of the BEF in the Failure of the Schlieffen ...

    The German army marched on neutral Belgium on 4th August 1914. This said, the Germans had not counted on Belgium's army and their patriotism. Belgium's frontier forts helped to slow Germany's advance by several days, but still it was not enough.

  1. Dear Diary, It was the start of the Christmas month and I was ready ...

    It was about 1 metre wide, around 2 inches in height and could go on forever, depending on the length of the trench. Without it we would either fall straight into the grounds like quicksand or it won't protect us from problems such as trench foot.

  2. Free essay

    Explain how the Schlieffen plan was meant to work. How did it end ...

    , therefore France would defend their territory half heartedly as they would not want severe damage to be inflicted on their industry. Von Molke modified the original plan of Alfred Von Schlieffen. He proposed that instead of Holland being invaded, the main route would now be the flat plains of Flanders.

  1. The Battle of Verdun.

    possible, to break the morale of the French army and to give the Germans a number advantage. For this to work they would have to take significantly less casualty's than the French, in the end none of this happened, the casualty rates were not far apart and the morale of

  2. World War 1 - How Two Bullets Caused 20 Million Deaths

    Germany wanted to be the strongest country in the world so they decided to compete with the other countries in army sizes to make sure that they were the strongest but other countries thought the same so they decided to compete as well and due to this army sizes trebled in one year and so did the navy.

  1. How Far Did Weapons and Tactics Change Over the Period of 1914 and 1918?

    They were designed to attempt to break the stalemate and move the war underway. This collection of changes were best epitomised in the Battle of Ypres in 1915 and the Battle of the Somme in 1916. The Battle of Ypres in 1915 demonstrated the first use of deadly poisoned gas.

  2. Was Field Marshall Douglas Haig more important that the allied blockade of German naval ...

    Captains or Generals on the ground could not go against their direct orders, even when it was inevitable that they would fail, later on during the war, more responsibilities were given to the ground troops. For instance if they saw that something was not going to go as planned then they could question or call off the attack.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work