• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE Coursework - Russian Revolution By James Windsor 10L Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism Nowadays Rasputin is quite often considered evil, but did he actually contribute to the collapse of Tsarism? Most people in our modern day society believe Rasputin was an evil person without knowing too many of the facts, or the story behind him and his background they see him as a drunken evil man, and he's often described as the mad monk when he was neither mad nor a monk however he built up a bad reputation to the modern day world Rasputin started life off as a peasant in the lowest cast, an untouchable and he used to take things from people to sell for drink. He was the lowest of the low and therefore it would have been hard to influence the tsar's decisions as he was of no importance he was just a peasant wasn't he?. But he was a spiritual man and spent hours a day in prayer he once said "The peasant is great in god's eyes", he left his family in search of enlightenment. ...read more.

Middle

The doctors confirmed that the child would eventually die. This family was of course the tsar and his wife. The tsarina had heard about Rasputin and asked him if he could help, Rasputin prayed beside the boy and comforted the boy even Rasputin's enemies admitted he was doing more than any doctor could. Although today we know that it is probably not due to the fact he had healing powers but it was more psychological, in comforting the child it relieved his pain as the calmer you are the easier it is to get better. However to the people of the time it seemed like he was working miracles the importance of Rasputin to the tsar and tsarina was very large for this reason and would have given him some influence on them. Which could mean the tsar paid some attention to his opinions as his sons life practically depended on him this is evidence he did contribute to the collapse of tsarism. ...read more.

Conclusion

Rasputin was a bit of a wild character and often went to parties he also wrote notes to many important characters most of which were ignored. Showing he had very little influence. He earned himself a very bad reputation especially by his behaviour at the bath houses. Soon enough Rasputin had angered his enemies too much and they decided to kill him, he was invited to a party and poisoned, shot, then thrown in a river and shot a few more times. This is one of the main factors that makes it look like Rasputin had very little to do with the collapse of tsarism the fact that after he died nothing changed, things continued the way they were just as when he was alive, once he had died which is strong evidence to suggest that he did not (or his contribution was very small) contribute to the collapse of tsarism. Rasputin basically acted as a scapegoat he was easy to lay the blame on; in actual truth he probably postponed the revolution more than anything. He was not so much a cause of the collapse of tsarism but a product of it. James Windsor 10L ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    This rapid growth of a huge new industrial class moving to the cities resulted in very poor living conditions for the workers, and many urban workers were forced to sleep on their workbenches. Joel Carmichael saw the strong influence in the dissolution of Tsarist rule from the social tensions among

  2. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    The expense of war led to inflation, and prices by the end of 1916 were four times those of 1914. However, the wages of workers did not increase at the same rate. This along with the fact that transporting grain into major cities like Petrograd was very difficult, meant that strikes in the county's capital became prominent.

  1. Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism.

    He was their link to the outside world, therefore he often helped make decisions about running Russia. But was he really responsible for the collapse of Tsarism, or was he just the Tsar's scapegoat? I am going to discuss these two arguments so that it is possible for me to decide which statement I believe the most.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    He was very calculated and knew what he had to do in order to get rid of who he didn't want. Congratulating the wives of the red army and then removing 25,000 of the red army shows how Stalin was a deceitful man.

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    An event that shows Tolstoy the Pessimist might have been right was Bloody Sunday. 500 demonstrators were being led by a priest but later shot at by Tsar Nicholas II's troops. While the Tsar was in power, people could not have a peaceful protest without fear of being killed.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    Fact written by supporter "two days ago reinforces the fact the writer doesn't know Stalin too much and refers to Stalin in the first person using words such as "I" which are personal words based on personal opinions. (4) Study Sources G and H.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    Victor Serge, who had many sympathies with anarchism, was implacably opposed to the Kronstadt mutineers, as the following passage shows: "The popular counter-revolution translated the demand for freely-elected soviets into one for 'soviets without Communists.' If the Bolshevik dictatorship fell, it was only a short step to chaos, and through

  2. The collapse of Tsarism.

    The Petrograd Soviet was a re-established St Petersburg Soviet or council of workers which was set up during the 1905 revolution. The difference between the new soviet and the old soviet is that the new one is made up of representatives from the Petrograd army garrisons as well as factory workers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work