• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism.

Extracts from this document...


GCSE COURSEWORK THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION 1917 1. Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism: The Tsar of Russia was in a bad position. His country was going downhill, as the Army was losing all of its battles and everybody was starving. The Tsar was also very isolated from his country, and knew nothing about his people or how to run it. In 1904, his German wife blessed him with a son, Alexis. Unfortunately, Alexis was a haemophiliac, and it was impossible for him to have a normal childhood. The royal family tried many ways to cure Alexis, but no doctors could help. In 1905, a visit to the Emperial Palace changed everything. Alexis was visited by a peasant holy man from Protofskio, Rasputin. The monk prayed for Alexis, and miraculously, Alexis recovered overnight. Several people thought that it happened because Rasputin loved and honoured the Tsar, but some sceptics believe that Rasputin did not have any real powers, and was just a fraud. Rasputin was a jumped-up monk from Siberia. His real name was Gregory Efimovitch, but he picked up the nickname Rasputin, which meant 'the disreputable one', and it certainly suited him. He led an intriguing lifestyle, which was filled with women and alcohol. ...read more.


Rasputin dealt with them, by sacking and imprisoning many of them. He then made it even worse by replacing them with ignorant and corrupt men. Rasputin's promiscuous reputation caused many Russians to dislike him. The peasants, because they were jealous, and the middle-class, because they were appalled that someone like him was basically running the country. They wanted their Tsar back, and not to be ruled by a common peasant. The Duma was a small government to help the Tsar, and most of them hated Rasputin. They believed that he was a German spy and that he was trying to destroy the country, but that was just a rumour without any actual evidence. They also thought that he was the cause of the economic collapse, even after Stolypin's help. He set up the Kulak, in which peasants could buy land and help keep the economy going. I do not see this argument to be as important as the next, as I feel that Rasputin only influenced the Tsarina, and the Tsar had made bad decisions throughout his reign. There were also some good things about Rasputin. He often donated money to people around Russia, and helped out as much as he could. ...read more.


For example, when the holy man predicted pain and tears in August 1914, but the ignorant Tsar did not listen. Then when he left for Mogilev, Russia collapsed and the war failed. I believe that Rasputin did slightly contribute to Russia's downfall, but it was mainly the Tsar's fault. He made bad decisions and did need Rasputin as a link. Rasputin may have just given some advice to help out a friend, or he may have been trying to make Russia fall. Still, without Rasputin, I believe that Russia would have been ruined by the Tsar anyway. He should have paid more attention to the lower classes, as they could have brought Russia back. They were the backbone of Russia because they did all of the hard work, yet got no respect. When the Tsar tried to create an army, they were unprepared for war. It is unsurprising that they failed with their lack of food, weapons, ammunition and training. It was his decision to continue with the war, and Russia may have been able to rise again if they had pulled out at that time. Rasputin was fairly harmless compared to the Tsar; he was just a helpful holy man who liked to enjoy himself. The real villain was the Tsar, who brought Russia down. Word count: 1,236 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    This attempt took the form of two decrees in 1907 and 1910 that broke up the peasant commune as a binding foundation through the allocation of land to individual peasants and the capability to disband the communes into a number of individual proprietors.

  2. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    However, the trigger that began this revolution seems to be the First World War. It does seem open to discussion that even if a revolution took place and the war did not, whether or not the Tsarist system would have survived as it did in 1905.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    The cartoon is mocking Stalin and his 'show trials' The men who are put on trial are seen happy and sarcastically admitting what they have been accused of. Source J is a cartoon published in France in the late 1930's, the title of the cartoon is 'The Stalinist Constitution'.

  2. Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism

    anyway his influence with the upper class ladies lead to his reputation spreading and the belief that he had spiritual healing powers, this interested one family in particular when their son was diagnosed as a haemophiliac at 18 months old this meant he couldn't play a lot of games like

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    The second grant was participation in the Duma for all classes of the population that were then denied the right to vote. This indicates that Russia was becoming a fully democratic country, thus confirming the ideas of Kokovstov, "Tsarism can change".

  2. Stalin man or monster

    He was a strong believer of equality. This clearly portrays and symbolises Stalin's compassionate and caring nature. The source shows Stalin to have qualities of a good leader. He seems like a leader who will listen to his peoples needs and provide for them. However, this source is unreliable about providing any useful information about Stalin as

  1. The collapse of Tsarism.

    This was all putting pressure on the Tsar. But when the Tsar choose to go and join the front line fighting he put him self up for a lot of criticism because if Russia lost a battle he would be to blame straight away because he was at the front line.

  2. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    Question 2: Study Source D. Does this source provide any useful evidence about Stalin? Explain your answer using the source and your own knowledge. Source D recalls a conversation taken place ten years before, between Winston Churchill and Stalin. At first, Churchill asks Stalin to compare the stresses of war to the stresses of collectivisation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work