• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE COURSEWORK THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION 1917 1. Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism: The Tsar of Russia was in a bad position. His country was going downhill, as the Army was losing all of its battles and everybody was starving. The Tsar was also very isolated from his country, and knew nothing about his people or how to run it. In 1904, his German wife blessed him with a son, Alexis. Unfortunately, Alexis was a haemophiliac, and it was impossible for him to have a normal childhood. The royal family tried many ways to cure Alexis, but no doctors could help. In 1905, a visit to the Emperial Palace changed everything. Alexis was visited by a peasant holy man from Protofskio, Rasputin. The monk prayed for Alexis, and miraculously, Alexis recovered overnight. Several people thought that it happened because Rasputin loved and honoured the Tsar, but some sceptics believe that Rasputin did not have any real powers, and was just a fraud. Rasputin was a jumped-up monk from Siberia. His real name was Gregory Efimovitch, but he picked up the nickname Rasputin, which meant 'the disreputable one', and it certainly suited him. He led an intriguing lifestyle, which was filled with women and alcohol. ...read more.

Middle

Rasputin dealt with them, by sacking and imprisoning many of them. He then made it even worse by replacing them with ignorant and corrupt men. Rasputin's promiscuous reputation caused many Russians to dislike him. The peasants, because they were jealous, and the middle-class, because they were appalled that someone like him was basically running the country. They wanted their Tsar back, and not to be ruled by a common peasant. The Duma was a small government to help the Tsar, and most of them hated Rasputin. They believed that he was a German spy and that he was trying to destroy the country, but that was just a rumour without any actual evidence. They also thought that he was the cause of the economic collapse, even after Stolypin's help. He set up the Kulak, in which peasants could buy land and help keep the economy going. I do not see this argument to be as important as the next, as I feel that Rasputin only influenced the Tsarina, and the Tsar had made bad decisions throughout his reign. There were also some good things about Rasputin. He often donated money to people around Russia, and helped out as much as he could. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example, when the holy man predicted pain and tears in August 1914, but the ignorant Tsar did not listen. Then when he left for Mogilev, Russia collapsed and the war failed. I believe that Rasputin did slightly contribute to Russia's downfall, but it was mainly the Tsar's fault. He made bad decisions and did need Rasputin as a link. Rasputin may have just given some advice to help out a friend, or he may have been trying to make Russia fall. Still, without Rasputin, I believe that Russia would have been ruined by the Tsar anyway. He should have paid more attention to the lower classes, as they could have brought Russia back. They were the backbone of Russia because they did all of the hard work, yet got no respect. When the Tsar tried to create an army, they were unprepared for war. It is unsurprising that they failed with their lack of food, weapons, ammunition and training. It was his decision to continue with the war, and Russia may have been able to rise again if they had pulled out at that time. Rasputin was fairly harmless compared to the Tsar; he was just a helpful holy man who liked to enjoy himself. The real villain was the Tsar, who brought Russia down. Word count: 1,236 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    This attempt took the form of two decrees in 1907 and 1910 that broke up the peasant commune as a binding foundation through the allocation of land to individual peasants and the capability to disband the communes into a number of individual proprietors.

  2. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    Even Stolypin's agrarian reforms did not solve the key problems and were too little too late. There was a growth in political opinion and the rise of a new middle class, through the spread of education and universities. This led to various opposition parties being founded throughout the country, such

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    As this speech was held in 1936, Bukharin hated Stalin and therefore it can be assumed that his speech will be very anti-Stalin. When evaluating which is more reliable source E or source F a few things should be taken into consideration.

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    date because he did not understand what civil liberties were expected in a modern state. The first allowance made to the nation granted people basic civil rights such as freedom of conscience, speech, assembly and association. This is a good example that Russia was beginning to modernize.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    as it was an autobiography and hence written by Stalin himself, who could have deciphered crucial information and in addition to this no other witness is there to confirm the story. The words Stalin uses and the style this source is written portrays him as an empathetic considerate man.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    the first successful socialist revolution, for proving that such a thing is possible, and therefore pointing the way for future generations. Such a precedent is dangerous! It is therefore necessary to "prove" (with the assistance of the usual crew of "objective" academics)

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    and attempted to undermine them. In conclusion, the source does not provide much useful evidence about what it is telling us about but it does provide evidence by the way it is written and the purpose it was written for. Question 3 Source E was from a speech written to Congress of Soviets in 1935 and was published in Pravda, a Communist Party newspaper.

  2. Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism

    anyway his influence with the upper class ladies lead to his reputation spreading and the belief that he had spiritual healing powers, this interested one family in particular when their son was diagnosed as a haemophiliac at 18 months old this meant he couldn't play a lot of games like

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work