• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the degree to which the year’s c1925-1929 were a time of economic and political stability for the Weimar Republic.

Extracts from this document...


Explain the degree to which the year's c1925-1929 were a time of economic and political stability for the Weimar Republic. The question above, still creates great debate to this very day, so to be able to answer it fully, I will look at both Stabilising and De-stabilising factors which affected the Weimar Republics economy and politics during the period between 1925-1929. During the Period Gustav Stresemann was the foreign minister (appointed in 1923, after being Chancellor until having lost the Reichstags confidence by November 1923), and a good foreign minister was essential in bringing economic stability (and to a certain degree political stability) to the Weimar republic. By being able to revise the Treaty of Versailles (by expelling reparations), Stresemann would be able to reduce the public hatred towards the republic for its acceptance of the Versailles Treaty, this revision would also help the Republic by giving it the chance to become stable, help re-build the country, and bring success and power to Germany. Stresemanns foreign policy, accepted that Germany was in no position to challenge the allies militarily and revise the treaty of Versailles by force. His strategy was known as fulfilment. This policy entailed negotiation because the lack of military power that Germany had, gaining the confidence of the Western powers and ending Germany's diplomatic isolation, using Germany's economic ...read more.


To them Stresemann concessions achieved little because Germany still remained occupied and disarmed, even the Young plan was opposed because it confirmed that Germany still had to pay reparations. Stresemann was only not trusted by the majority on the left, as he was national liberal who liked the idea of a republic. Although most historians are divided over how successful Stresemann's policy was in making gains, most accept that he failed to strengthen significantly the Weimar regime. There is also considerable evidence, that his policy failed to Rally Germans to favour the new regime, because the concessions he gained were not sufficiently dramatic. Although Germanys economic problems were gradually being resolved, and Hyperinflation had been brought into control with the introduction of the Rentenmark, the problem still remained that the foreign loans that Germany was receiving to help build up its economy, and to help stabilise the country would all eventually have to be paid back, so this was only a short-term solution for economic stability. Such political difference as shown with Stresemann who was hated by both left and right wing helps highlight the political differences' and in-stability at the time. However after 1923 politics was starting to become comparatively stable compared to the previous years, there were no attempted coups, from either right or left wing, between 1924-1929, and no major political figures were assassinated. ...read more.


With all this evidence, I believe that the economy was returning to normal, and was stabilising, how-ever this was with the aid of foreign loans, which meant that this stability was a "forged" one, as the loans would have to be paid back, and either at worst de-stabilise the economy, or severely hinder the progression of Germany. I believe Stresemann made a vital contribution to the progression of Germany during this period, although he did fail in winning people over to the idea of a republic, he did manage to make Germany a recognised power, and transformed it from being a distrusted out-cast to being actively involved in European diplomacy, and by gaining the confidence of Western powers, helped to end Germanys diplomatic isolation. The so-called "political stability" of 1924-8 only appeared stable in comparison to the turmoil of 1918-23, where there had been a over-whelming number of Weimar governments, and political assassinations and attempted coups were on the increase. Such attempted revolts, seized past 1923, and helped to make the period of 1925-1929 relatively stable. How-ever I believe that deep down in the ranks of Weimar government, it still remained un-stable but was increasing beginning to stabilise, but looked relatively stability, when compared to the very politically un-stable previous years. How-ever we will never know, if the Weimar government was beginning to stabilise, as the Wall Street crash, and the depression helped to end the Weimar Republic. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. What problems did the Weimar Republic face from 1919 to 1923, and why did ...

    * Kahr, released by Hitler, called in the police and army reinforcements. 2. 9 Nov 1923 * The Nazis marched on Munich. Stopped by police in Residenzstrasse, 16 Nazis were killed. Ludendorff was arrested. Hitler hid, then fled (he was arrested 2 days later). Results [Defeat? Tell Me Something!] 1.

  2. The Weimar Republic: "the Golden Years" 1924-1929.

    He couldn't find a Chancellor who had support in the Reichstag, and was opposed to democracy, which was shown when he appointed Franz von Papen as Chancellor, an inexperienced man who couldn't govern.

  1. Why was the Weimar Republic able to survive 1919 - 1929?

    Stresemann's first move was to combat hyperinflation, which was crippling German society and economy. Stresemann did this by introducing a new currency, called the Rentenmark (rate of 1, 000, 000, 000, 000 old Marks for 1 new Mark). To further stabilise the economy he reduced spending and bureaucracy and increased taxes.

  2. Weimar, 1918 - 1923

    Poincar´┐Ż (the French Premier) insisted that Germany pay up or face military action (the British representatives withdrew). On January 9th, 1923, the Reparations Commission stated that Germany had failed to deliver coal. On January 11th, French and Belgian troops entered the Ruhr.

  1. Weimar, 1924 - 1929

    Gregor was more of a socialist than Hitler and most other Nazis (closer to Mussolini's brand of fascism). KD Bracher "The Strassers were inclined to take the 'socialist' programme of the party rather seriously; they supported the idea of a fascist-corporate state and the nationalisation of heavy industry and large land-holdings."

  2. What were the main problems for the Weimar Republic 1918-23?

    Many of these institutions, such as the legal and education systems and the civil services were opposed to the republic. Although it had its problems, the Weimar Constitution proved to be democratic and liberal which was an improvement on the totalitarian and strict Bismarkian constitution.

  1. To what extent had the Weimar Republic achieved political, economic and social stability by ...

    The French and English both supported the international treaty and was a compromise that would allow Germany to rebuild without being a significant threat to the French.The main idea of the treaties was nations seeking ?by common agreement means of preserving their respective nations from the scourge of war and for providing for the peaceful settlement of disputes?.

  2. Nazi Germany Revision 1918-45

    Membership of the party rose to over 100,000 by 1928. In 1928 the Nazis only won 12 Reichstag seats ? 2.6% of the vote; this was a low point.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work