• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the differences in thinking between Hoover and Roosevelt in their approach to The Depression

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain the differences in thinking between Hoover and Roosevelt in their approach to The Depression Hoover and Roosevelt have two very different ways of approaching The Depression. Hoover who was orphaned at the age of eight and worked most of his life didn't cure about the ordinary Americans. He let them go hungry and become homeless. Roosevelt on the other hand who was born into a rich family didn't really meet ordinary people until he started Warm Springs. When he became then Governor of New York he did everything he could to help the people in his state. When the Wall Street Crash happen and the Depression hit America Hoover believed that life would return to normal in a few months so he didn't try anything to stop the Depression from continuing. ...read more.

Middle

Hoover's first major job was where he was working at gold mines all over the world. The reason he believes that the Government shouldn't interfere with personnel wealth is because he became rich by hard work and a lot of individual effort. He believed that if he could done that everyone in America could also become rich he called it "the American system of rugged individualism". When Hoover realised that The Great Depression was not going to sort itself out which just happened to be before the Presidential elections he decided to take action to stop the Depression. He set up the Reconstruction Finance Corporation who's job it was to lend money to companies with financial problems in order to stop them from going bankrupt and closing down. ...read more.

Conclusion

Roosevelt's way of dealing with The Depression was to spend $20 million on helping the "forgotten" American people like the unemployed, the homeless and the hungry. The American people liked Roosevelt's way of dealing with The Depression more than Hoover's way so when the election came the Americans voted for Roosevelt to be their President, the first President ever to have a disability. My conclusion is that Hoover's approach to The Depression was that it would go away and sort itself out without the Government doing anything about. Roosevelt's approach to The Depression is that only the Government intervening could stop The Depression. My view is that Roosevelt's way of dealing with The Depression is much better than Hoover's because he wants to do something about it where as Hoover just wants it to sort itself out. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Why people supported Roosevelt in the 1932 election

    In the first statement is clearly subjective. This is due to the fact that some thought that the money used to carry out schemes such as the CWA, for example, had been wasted, as well as others believed the opposite. In the case of the second statement, we are once again provided factual information about one of the failures of the New Deal: reducing high unemployment.

  2. Policies to end the Depression: Hoover vs. Roosevelt

    He was therefore even more reluctant to tap into the national dept, for he feared it would prolong the Depression, since the government would have to pay interests on the loans. The Federal Reserve Bank decided to defend the value of the dollar, raising interest-rates to prevent it being turned into gold.

  1. The Wall Street crash, the great depression and its how it affected the lives ...

    According to one historian, Henry Steel Commager, "The orchards were heavy with fruit and granaries were bursting with grain. Yet people were starving." The middle classes also suffered a lot during this time because they were so unaccustomed to living on the poverty line or below.

  2. Explain the differences in thinking between Herbert Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt in their approach ...

    Hoover and the republicans thought they had a 'fool proof' safety net in case things went wrong. These were trusts. Basically these were large pools of money that industry could call upon if the worst came to the worst and it looked like businesses were going to begin folding and going under.

  1. The great depression.

    This would lead to significant cuts in players salaries. The managers and stars saw their salaries cut considerably, although they were under no circumstances poverty stricken like the 13 million unemployed people in this country in 1933. In 1931, Babe Ruth was paid $80,000, John Mcgraw earned $50,000, as did Connie Mack, and Rogers Hornsby pulled down 40,000.

  2. How do the philosophies of President Hoover with those of President Roosevelt compare, in ...

    Between the time Roosevelt was elected as president and his inaugural address in 1932, the depression had reached its lowest point. The economy again collapsed, unemployment reached 15 million, and the farmers faced impending foreclosures. America was breathing over Roosevelt's shoulder waiting for him to make his move.

  1. Use Source A and your knowledge of the period to explain why people supported ...

    Source B clearly states to us that 14 million people were unemployed when Roosevelt came to power. To help decrease this huge number of unemployed Roosevelt employed his alphabet agencies as well as old age pensions. On the other hand source C tells us that in 1983 Roosevelt has 11

  2. What were the causes of the great depression?

    to pay for new goods or products like many had done previously. 'Black Thursday' was the name given to October 24th 1929...the stock market was doing terribly. 6 banks spent $40,000,000 buying shares in companies to try and gain back the confidence, but it didn't work.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work