• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the different reactions of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating children during the Second World War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain the different reactions of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating children during the Second World War In Britain, there were many different reactions to the policy of evacuation in the Second Wold War. Many different groups of society were affected by evacuation. Some of the people who would have been affected the most were teachers who looked after the evacuees, foster parents, parents of the evacuees, children who received evacuees into their homes as well as the evacuees themselves. The group of people whose lives were most disrupted by evacuation were probably the foster parents who took the evacuees in to their farms and country houses. The foster parents' reactions differed greatly depending on the type of person. Some genuinely wanted to support the children whose lives had been turned upside down while others didn't want the hassle of another mouth to feed. The ones who helped the children took them in and treated them as one of their own, often by making their livelihoods better than when they had lived in the cities. ...read more.

Middle

Evacuees treated well by their foster families adapted more easily to their lives in the countryside. They enjoyed the experiences of their new lives and took the lifestyle changes in their stride. Many learnt valuable life lessons from their foster families and formed friendships that would last a lifetime. At the end of the war, lots of these children didn't rejoice at the idea of returning home to the dingy cities but were in fact adopted by the foster family. Evacuees were often ill-treated and forced to labour for their foster families, becoming a servant or farm-hand. Many were beaten for bed-wetting or even their "deplorable condition." The children who were treated not quite as well were obviously unhappy but over time they formed relationships with the foster families and were sad to leave when the time came. Poor evacuees who were evacuated to richer homes often felt inferior to the foster families and would have had some trouble adjusting, as would richer evacuees going to slightly poorer homes as they had to make do without the luxury they were used to. ...read more.

Conclusion

The teachers took up their new roles with enthusiasm as they genuinely cared about the children they had taught, but many of the female teachers also had their own children being evacuated as well causing them stress and anxiety. In conclusion, the reactions of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating children in the Second World War differed depending on who you were. In the beginning I think there was a lot of anguish between the children leaving and their parents left behind as well as a lot of discontentment from the foster families having to accept another child into their home. Teachers played a vital role in making the transaction as smooth as possible. Evacuation brought people of all different backgrounds together, not always with the best results, country folk learnt the harshness of city life and the evacuees gained an experience which would always remain with them. On the whole, I believe the process of evacuation was a period of massive upheaval with long reaching consequences that no-one at the time could have predicted. The differing reactions of the people were largely a result of the diverse experiences that everyone involved in evacuation had. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Evacuation in Britain during the Second World War

    function: only twenty-seven of those who were evacuated and stayed in the countryside for the duration of the war were killed by German bombings by 1942. So it was successful as it protected the vulnerable and the important from civilian attacks, which makes it certainly successful in part.

  2. Explain the differing reactions of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating children ...

    More over, evacuees since the Second World War still remember their evacuation as their, 'adventure;' understandably those who experienced a good evacuation will cherish their memory, for instance In John Reynard's case: 'The countryside was wonderful for a boy from the city: the fields, animals, woodlands, the river and the

  1. What was the extent of change in the role of the UK government in ...

    It was a chaotic system because it had to be executed as quickly and on as large a scale as possible. The children who were sent away often enjoyed a better standard of living and a chance to see the countryside.

  2. Explain the differencing reactions /feelings of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating ...

    and also beds for when the husbands came to stay. In some villages there were parties once a week for the evacuees, they could also do their washing in the community washhouses. This gave them time to chat and discuss issues while getting work done.

  1. Explain the different reactions of the British people to evacuation

    Life back in London, however, was far from ideal. "One morning when I woke up there was a huge crater at the other end of our street. Sixteen houses had disappeared; there was a gigantic hole in the middle of the road."

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    Both the sources are unreliable because they were both written or made many years after the war. Therefore, the teacher in source B and the director of source F would have to rely on memory so details could have been forgotten and experiences could have been exaggerated.

  1. How did the Second World War affect the lives of the people of South ...

    Personal accounts are good because they are facts because they were there at the time. There are limitations though, some people might over exaggerate or over the years they might have forgot some parts and added some of their own. Another personal account is from Mrs Jenkinsin source 4 .

  2. In the early years of the Second World War large numbersof British people were ...

    The evacuees themselves held numerous views on the government's policy. Even though some were too young to understand many children who were evacuated have been profoundly affected by their experiences to the extent that some are "still waiting to go home".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work