• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the different reactions of the British people to evacuation

Extracts from this document...


Explain the different reactions of the British people to the policy of evacuation When the government ordered the evacuation of British children at the onset of the Second World War, there was a range of responses from the general public. Whether they moved away as individuals or with their whole school community, the changes to everyday life were profound: around a quarter of all Britons were relocated during the first three days of September 1939. The effects of this were felt by many different groups in society; people's reactions and attitudes were often mixed, complex, and - for many - changed as the war went on. Of course, the main reason for evacuation was that the government was worried that major British cities would suffer extensive bombing, with civilian death tolls in London alone estimated at around 4 million. There was sufficient evidence to believe this, too - the Luftwaffe had featured extensively in the Spanish civil war, annihilating towns such as Guernica (made famous by Picasso) with relentless air strikes. Furthermore, in the East, Germany's allies Japan had ruthlessly bombed major Chinese cities such as Nanjing. Logically, parents would have been relieved to allow their children to escape from the potential threat and dangers of city life, however this was frequently not the case. ...read more.


When the bombing raids did begin, some children were not re-evacuated, remaining instead in the city with their real families. The attitudes of children towards evacuation depended on their personal experiences and personalities. Some simply hated it, but for many others evacuation was a great adventure (many had never left the city, or been in a train). Evacuee Barbara Male remembers how when she left London: "Some of the very small children were crying... [however] when the train left Paddington Station, they brightened up. They soon forgot their troubles, and they were all looking out of the carriage window talking and laughing for all they were worth." Sometimes, siblings were split up. This could be good or bad, depending on whose point of view it was - often younger children would miss their older brother/sister, whereas an older, more independent youth might prefer the freedom. Second World War evacuee Malcolm Lewis recalls how, at the age of five, he was sent to live on a smallholding with an uncle (who he had never met before) when the war began. The place was dirty and little emphasis was placed on comfort; within a month, Lewis had contracted scarlet fever, ringworm, and numerous other maladies. ...read more.


The people they stayed with obviously had opinions too. Many of these stemmed from their initial reasons for taking in evacuees. Some families felt it was their duty, helping the war effort. Some had no choice, while others were encouraged by the financial incentive provided by the government, or some other reason. Irene Griffiths recalls: "My foster parents were quite kind and welcomed me - I think they were really happy to have a senior girl evacuee and I became a useful baby sitter for their only 3 year old son." It was not uncommon for evacuees to be adopted at the end of the war; many never went back to live in the city. Other carers were astonished by lack of manners and uncouth behaviour displayed by some children, however over the course of the war many of these youths who stayed would have been taught manners and politeness, and so learned to co-exist peacefully with their billets. George Knott remembers: "I think our foster mother found us a bit hard to understand with our more worldly ways." Overall, every Briton at the time had a unique experience. There were many factors that influenced how they felt about evacuation, and many of these views were altered throughout the war as circumstances changed and people became more tolerant and adaptable. ?? ?? ?? ?? Christopher Lewis 10/2/07 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. There are a variety of reasons why people had different interpretations of their evacuation ...

    This is now though the eyes of the evacuation host rather than through the eyes of the evacuee. This experience is not as major as the experience for the evacuee is because they do not have to move out of their house, they have just invited someone into their house.

  2. Explain the differing reactions of the British people to the policy of evacuation in ...

    of the country side, helping on farms, and eating better than they had ever done. Middle class children who had been evacuated would have felt excited, but would have also had more of an understanding of the fact that it wasn't just a holiday they were going on and they would have known it was different.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work