• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

explain the importance of the use of force in enabling the Tsarist regime to survive the 1905 Revolution

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain the importance of the use of force, in relation to other factors, in enabling the tsarist government to survive the Revolution of 1905. It could be claimed that the use of force before and after the Revolution of 1905 was the only reason that the autocratic system, led by the Tsar and his advisors, still ran the country after the Russian revolution of 1905 (by using such force to end it.) Sources A, B and C certainly support this theory, leading to the assumption that Nicholas II, proving his willingness to use force to put down even the slightest threat by the use of terrifying violence preceding the revolution, (the notorious 'Bloody Sunday' as described in Sources A and B prove that Nicholas II was open to use force, and did if he felt threatened) and then it comes as no surprise in Source C that when everything else seemed to be failing he readily brought it out again. But although force was used, Nicholas II, and his key advisors did not always resort to violence to solve their problems. ...read more.

Middle

to be an unprovoked attack whereas Source B gives a similar sequence of events but where the troops 'had to open fire' agreeing over the fact that violence was used, but the motives behind each differ. It is unsurprising therefore to hear in Source C that 'what finally brought the troubles to an end was the use of force' and we can now understand that Nicholas II would have had no problem with this. Perhaps the most significant and terrifying use of violence, excluding Bloody Sunday, was the use of troops to put down the St Petersburg Soviet and to crush those on strike in Moscow. Loyal troops were also sent into the countryside to restore law and order, which would have no doubt deterred them from their actions. But, Nicholas II did try, at first to subdue the rioting with peaceful methods. He re-appointed Witte as Prime Minister who advised him to make concessions, which he did with the October Manifesto. This allowed freedom of speech, freedom of the press, political parties became legal and an elected assembly was established (the Duma) ...read more.

Conclusion

Peasants could leave the Mir or commune and work on their own, and Redemption Payments were cancelled. Government land in Siberia was given to peasants who moved there. This satisfied peasants for the moment and was a non-violent method of calming the riots. Therefore, in conclusion, it can be said that although an undesirable and terrifying alternative, the force used by Nicholas II and his troops, proved to be a more effective solution to the rioting than the October Manifesto and Stolypin's repression. It actually resulted in the end of the Revolution. But this just leaves the question; to what extent did tsarism survive? The October Manifesto allowed the creation of an elected assembly, a small step towards democracy and reducing the influence of autocracy in Russia. Yet, although it seemed that autocracy was changing, in practice the Tsar's position and influence did not change that much. The Duma was introduced to bring an element of democracy to the Russian Government by allowing decisions to be made by an elected body of representatives but in reality this was not as effective as the Tsar had the power to reject or pass any bills he wanted, therefore undermining the Duma and having ultimate control of bills passed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How far did the 1905 revolution weaken then Tsarist regime?

    power with his people by inviting opposition into the government; this meant he was endangering his power and authority. However, this was not the case. It helped strengthened the Tsar's power. The forming of the Duma appeased the liberals and satisfied their appetite for reforms, hence they are willing to cooperate with the Tsar rather than oppose Tsarism completely.

  2. How and why was Nicholas able to survive the 1905 revolution?

    His next actions were a key factor in his immediate survival of 1905. Nicholas, being blamed for the defeat by Japan and having lost his title of 'Little Father' had no other option but to accept concession, however in doing this the government planned to split up the 'Union of Unions', and therefore remove the united threat to his control.

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    Source G was produced in 1916, by opposition to the Tsar. The purpose of the cartoon is to stir up discontent amongst ordinary Russians. The cartoon tries to suggest that the Tsar and Tsarina were heavily influenced by Rasputin. The cartoon shows this by depicting the Tsar and Tsarina in

  2. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    It is not surprising therefore that Russia did not launch a full-scale drive to industrialise until the 1890's. Ivan Vyshnegradsky attempted to drive Russia forward by increasing its exports and imports. This initially had the desired effect however it put a lot of pressure on the peasantry and in 1891-2

  1. How Did The Tsar Survive The 1905 Revolution?

    According to article 87 the Tsar had the power to pass laws when the Duma was in recess. He was still in charge of foreign policy and was still able to rule his empire. This put him in virtually the same amount of control as he had before as he

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Stalin's 25 years in power is evidence that he was a persistent and durable leader. During his time Stalin achieved many of his aims. He began to modernise Russia and built it up into its superpower status. Stalin's long term aim was to leave a lasting imprint on the future

  1. How did the tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    opposition to the Tsar and everything it stood for, especially by the Union of Liberation and the national minorities. The peasants had had a great deal of respect for the Tsar. The Tsar was the leader of their church and he was a father like figure for them.

  2. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    This led to various concessions being made by the government in order to calm the objectors. The October Manifesto which was a booklet of concessions made by the Tsar (not reforms) was an advisory act from De Witte. "Personal inviolability...conscience, speech, assembly and union" 2 was promised, along with the formation of a parliament or Duma, elected by the population.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work