• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

explain the importance of the use of force in enabling the Tsarist regime to survive the 1905 Revolution

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain the importance of the use of force, in relation to other factors, in enabling the tsarist government to survive the Revolution of 1905. It could be claimed that the use of force before and after the Revolution of 1905 was the only reason that the autocratic system, led by the Tsar and his advisors, still ran the country after the Russian revolution of 1905 (by using such force to end it.) Sources A, B and C certainly support this theory, leading to the assumption that Nicholas II, proving his willingness to use force to put down even the slightest threat by the use of terrifying violence preceding the revolution, (the notorious 'Bloody Sunday' as described in Sources A and B prove that Nicholas II was open to use force, and did if he felt threatened) and then it comes as no surprise in Source C that when everything else seemed to be failing he readily brought it out again. But although force was used, Nicholas II, and his key advisors did not always resort to violence to solve their problems. ...read more.

Middle

to be an unprovoked attack whereas Source B gives a similar sequence of events but where the troops 'had to open fire' agreeing over the fact that violence was used, but the motives behind each differ. It is unsurprising therefore to hear in Source C that 'what finally brought the troubles to an end was the use of force' and we can now understand that Nicholas II would have had no problem with this. Perhaps the most significant and terrifying use of violence, excluding Bloody Sunday, was the use of troops to put down the St Petersburg Soviet and to crush those on strike in Moscow. Loyal troops were also sent into the countryside to restore law and order, which would have no doubt deterred them from their actions. But, Nicholas II did try, at first to subdue the rioting with peaceful methods. He re-appointed Witte as Prime Minister who advised him to make concessions, which he did with the October Manifesto. This allowed freedom of speech, freedom of the press, political parties became legal and an elected assembly was established (the Duma) ...read more.

Conclusion

Peasants could leave the Mir or commune and work on their own, and Redemption Payments were cancelled. Government land in Siberia was given to peasants who moved there. This satisfied peasants for the moment and was a non-violent method of calming the riots. Therefore, in conclusion, it can be said that although an undesirable and terrifying alternative, the force used by Nicholas II and his troops, proved to be a more effective solution to the rioting than the October Manifesto and Stolypin's repression. It actually resulted in the end of the Revolution. But this just leaves the question; to what extent did tsarism survive? The October Manifesto allowed the creation of an elected assembly, a small step towards democracy and reducing the influence of autocracy in Russia. Yet, although it seemed that autocracy was changing, in practice the Tsar's position and influence did not change that much. The Duma was introduced to bring an element of democracy to the Russian Government by allowing decisions to be made by an elected body of representatives but in reality this was not as effective as the Tsar had the power to reject or pass any bills he wanted, therefore undermining the Duma and having ultimate control of bills passed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    and therefore the writer would have access to more information than the cartoonist of source G. This would result in source H being more accurate than source G, and they would therefore show different views of the influence of Rasputin.

  2. How far did the 1905 revolution weaken then Tsarist regime?

    power with his people by inviting opposition into the government; this meant he was endangering his power and authority. However, this was not the case. It helped strengthened the Tsar's power. The forming of the Duma appeased the liberals and satisfied their appetite for reforms, hence they are willing to cooperate with the Tsar rather than oppose Tsarism completely.

  1. How did the tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    The appointment of Witte as chief minister early in October was always seen by Nicholas as a means to an end. Witte had the political skill that Nicholas lacked and the October Manifesto was virtually dictated to Nicholas by Witte after Witte had negotiated its terms with the Union of Unions.

  2. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    Although Alexander II had made some progress in modernising Russia's economy, Britain and Germany were now forging ahead even more quickly. Russia was a difficult country to industrialise, due mainly to its size and the problem it had with serfdom.

  1. How Did The Tsar Survive The 1905 Revolution?

    According to article 87 the Tsar had the power to pass laws when the Duma was in recess. He was still in charge of foreign policy and was still able to rule his empire. This put him in virtually the same amount of control as he had before as he

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    The three pyramids were represented by the Kulaks, Jews and the middle-class sections of Russia. There is a tainted smirk lined across the face of Stalin which indicates that he had no penitence for the crimes he committed. He regarded his actions as in the best needs of Communism and Russia as a country.

  1. How and why was Nicholas able to survive the 1905 revolution?

    The Liberals, noticing the opportunity to take advantage of a weakened Russia following the unrest stated by Bloody Sunday on January 22nd, formed the 'Union of Unions' in May of 1905. Their declaration stated that "We appeal to all groups, to all parties...with our strength...you must hasten the removal of

  2. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    The St. Petersburg Soviet, lead by Trotsky stopped its strike on October 19 and people went back to work. Signs of the succession of the concessions begun to arouse. Nicholas made sure that his armed forces remained loyal by ending the war with Japan, thus putting an end to the loss of hundreds of peasants' relatives.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work