• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the importance of the war at sea to the final outcome of WWI

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain the importance of the war at sea to the final outcome of the war. The war at sea played quite a vital role in World War I, unlike the war at air, but possibly not as big a role as the war on land. Each side knew how vitally important it was to control the seas, as the land war was closely linked to the sea war, much more than the war at air was. It was unusual, in that there were not particularly any major sea battles or proper fighting - it was more of a struggle of stealth and caution to gain control of the seas. This is seen in the land war as well, which was meant to be a rapid affair yet turned out to be completely the opposite. The aim of the war at sea, therefore, was not necessarily to destroy as many enemy ships as possible in all out war but to cut off enemy supply lines and stop the enemy from cutting of your supply lines. This saw the rise of a new warfare strategy - submarine warfare. It was clear to everyone, especially the Germans now that the war had started, that the British navy was superior to everyone else's before the war and the years leading up to it. ...read more.

Middle

Each side utilised the naval surface technology - Dreadnoughts. The aim for the Germans was to remove the blockade of its seaports and harbours by British ships. Ultimately the main objective failed, although the Germans did destroy more British ships than British destroyed German. The German fleet remained in port for the rest of war after this battle ended. The U-Boat campaign resumed in 1917, with an overall larger fleet of submarines to carry out the job for the Germans. Many had been newly built and were unleashed to sight as many ships as possible and destroy them. Neutral ships and warships were targeted, the former with the most emphasis. The main aim now was to starve the Allied population of vital supplies and materials to halt their war effort. This still involved destroying ships related to the USA and they entered the war soon after the launch of the second campaign. Germany did not care now whether or not the USA entered the war, as they saw it as a reasonable gamble to defeat the British navy and trade ships before the USA had time to properly enter the war. Germany was feeling the strain of the naval blockade at this point and the deadlock on the Western front was placing severe strain on German forces for supplies. ...read more.

Conclusion

German people and their soldiers died of starvation without vital supplies increasingly more as the war grinded on. The war at sea was directly responsible for this, although nearly not as much as the war on land was. Germany, although had some sporadic minor victories at sea, never really placed a blockade on Britain as harsh as Britain placed upon them. Though the blockade didn't have immediate effect on the Germans, it did have an effect in the long run, nonetheless. This is seen in the Ludendorrf offensive and the later years of the war, when Germany was forced to give up the warfare of attrition for all out attack. However, their supply lines were low and German soldiers raided British supply huts for food and water. USA intervention (although due to the Germans because of the need to remove the blockade) proved decisive in the final year of the war. Any sea battle in the war was, on the whole, irrelevant to the outcome. Arguably, though, the war at sea contributed only partly to the land war. This part, however, was much bigger than the war in the air's contribution. The Western Front was the main culprit for using up the most amounts of supplies and material. In conclusion, the war at sea played quite a significant role in deciding the outcome of the war, again not as decisive as the Western Front though. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Who Was Responsible for The Tragedy at Gallipoli in 1915?

    When the GHQ16 transferred from the Arcadian to the Queen Elizabeth17, the chiefs of administration were left behind, and were even deprived of using the "wireless telegraph"! Braithwaite was required to join the GHQ and Lines-of-Communication HQ together. He failed.

  2. Trench warfare. Trench warfare was created to help hold your position and fend ...

    itch uncontrollably and the rats bit the mean and caused there bites to become infected. "Life in the trenches was dirty, cold, and uncomfortable. Soldiers shared space not only with other soldiers but also with rats and lice. The rats stole food and bit the men incessantly.

  1. Explain the importance of the war in the air to the final outcome of ...

    They were effectively huge bags of low-density hydrogen gas. Within them were the cockpit and a metal framework, which carried the bombs that could be released from a bullet-proof cage. They were used in the war at sea by both sides for escorting and spotting ships, gaining advantages over their adversaries.

  2. Questions on World War One.

    However, when the German Chief of Staff, von Moltke, heard that Austria was only going to mobilise in the Balkans, he recognised that, unless she launched an offensive in Poland against Russia, the German Army in East Prussia would be overwhelmed by the Russians and the Schlieffen strategy gravely compromised.

  1. In February 1943, the German Army surrendered at Stalingrad, Was Hitlers interference the main ...

    an ongoing streak of winning attacks and the attacks Hitler ordered were working. Examples of this are; the invasion of France which took 6 weeks, the invasion of Poland which was relatively quick and easy and the invasion of Yugoslavia which also took around 6 weeks.

  2. History Sourcework- Field Marshal Haig Final

    Source A seems to oppose the interpretation, as it shows the reaction of the crowds at the peace procession in 1919. It shows Haig approved by the crowd for his accomplishments, but it is likely that they were in fact simply cheering out of relief.

  1. WW1-planning for war, major battles. War at sea and in the air.

    * The BEF arrived with two weeks and further weakened the German forces. Again this was not expected. * The Russians mobilized in ten days and not the six weeks Schlieffen had predicted. The forces in France were again weakened as more men were sent to face Russia who had already started to attack German soil.

  2. Was Field Marshall Douglas Haig more important that the allied blockade of German naval ...

    By 1917 civilians in Germany were experiencing severe shortages. ?It was in food supplies that Germany was most vulnerable. The blockade ensured that this problem would worsen steadily the longer the war continued. Whereas France by mid- 1916 had only to tighten his belt, Germany was approaching a desperate state of shortage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work