• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the importance of the war at sea to the final outcome of WWI

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain the importance of the war at sea to the final outcome of the war. The war at sea played quite a vital role in World War I, unlike the war at air, but possibly not as big a role as the war on land. Each side knew how vitally important it was to control the seas, as the land war was closely linked to the sea war, much more than the war at air was. It was unusual, in that there were not particularly any major sea battles or proper fighting - it was more of a struggle of stealth and caution to gain control of the seas. This is seen in the land war as well, which was meant to be a rapid affair yet turned out to be completely the opposite. The aim of the war at sea, therefore, was not necessarily to destroy as many enemy ships as possible in all out war but to cut off enemy supply lines and stop the enemy from cutting of your supply lines. This saw the rise of a new warfare strategy - submarine warfare. It was clear to everyone, especially the Germans now that the war had started, that the British navy was superior to everyone else's before the war and the years leading up to it. ...read more.

Middle

Each side utilised the naval surface technology - Dreadnoughts. The aim for the Germans was to remove the blockade of its seaports and harbours by British ships. Ultimately the main objective failed, although the Germans did destroy more British ships than British destroyed German. The German fleet remained in port for the rest of war after this battle ended. The U-Boat campaign resumed in 1917, with an overall larger fleet of submarines to carry out the job for the Germans. Many had been newly built and were unleashed to sight as many ships as possible and destroy them. Neutral ships and warships were targeted, the former with the most emphasis. The main aim now was to starve the Allied population of vital supplies and materials to halt their war effort. This still involved destroying ships related to the USA and they entered the war soon after the launch of the second campaign. Germany did not care now whether or not the USA entered the war, as they saw it as a reasonable gamble to defeat the British navy and trade ships before the USA had time to properly enter the war. Germany was feeling the strain of the naval blockade at this point and the deadlock on the Western front was placing severe strain on German forces for supplies. ...read more.

Conclusion

German people and their soldiers died of starvation without vital supplies increasingly more as the war grinded on. The war at sea was directly responsible for this, although nearly not as much as the war on land was. Germany, although had some sporadic minor victories at sea, never really placed a blockade on Britain as harsh as Britain placed upon them. Though the blockade didn't have immediate effect on the Germans, it did have an effect in the long run, nonetheless. This is seen in the Ludendorrf offensive and the later years of the war, when Germany was forced to give up the warfare of attrition for all out attack. However, their supply lines were low and German soldiers raided British supply huts for food and water. USA intervention (although due to the Germans because of the need to remove the blockade) proved decisive in the final year of the war. Any sea battle in the war was, on the whole, irrelevant to the outcome. Arguably, though, the war at sea contributed only partly to the land war. This part, however, was much bigger than the war in the air's contribution. The Western Front was the main culprit for using up the most amounts of supplies and material. In conclusion, the war at sea played quite a significant role in deciding the outcome of the war, again not as decisive as the Western Front though. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. WW1-planning for war, major battles. War at sea and in the air.

    The Schlieffen plan had completely failed and Germany now faced their worst nightmare; War on two fronts. The First Battle of Ypres (October-November 1914) More British troops were lost in this 2 month battle than in the whole three years of the Boer War, (over 10,000 died in the First Battle of Ypres).

  2. Explain the importance of the war in the air to the final outcome of ...

    They were effectively huge bags of low-density hydrogen gas. Within them were the cockpit and a metal framework, which carried the bombs that could be released from a bullet-proof cage. They were used in the war at sea by both sides for escorting and spotting ships, gaining advantages over their adversaries.

  1. Questions on World War One.

    Conclusion : Human factors interacted with historical factors. Both were responsible for war. Do you consider that the outbreak of a general war was inevitable after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand? This question queries the inevitability of a general war after the assassination.

  2. Trench warfare. Trench warfare was created to help hold your position and fend ...

    While living in the trenches it caused the soldiers to contract diseases like trench foot, trench mouth, and shell shock. The animals carried diseases that could be transferred if they bit you which happened commonly. Lice and rats were the two most commonly seen in trenches, lice made the men

  1. How far can Germany be held responsible for WWI?

    and the government realized only too late that the conflict could not remain localized. Ritter goes on to explain that the German government relied too much on military planners and in doing so devised plans, which made it almost impossible to escape the escalation of issues resulting in war.

  2. Dear Diary, It was the start of the Christmas month and I was ready ...

    This was the best food you could get but the cooks don't stick to this and they give us food, which is disgusting and also very unhealthy because of diseases and stuff and very little amount of food because they had to get around loads of soldiers.

  1. Who Was Responsible for The Tragedy at Gallipoli in 1915?

    Much of this can be labelled as bad planning, and an extreme amount of bad luck for the allies. C) Evaluation of Sources (4 marks) Two of the sources I used were: Peter Weir's Film: "Gallipoli", released in 1981 by Australian Film Distribution Company.

  2. Was Field Marshall Douglas Haig more important that the allied blockade of German naval ...

    But this had very little apparent effect on the execution of war on the Western front, or elsewhere. The British were compelled to consider what further measures they could put into effect. In March 1915 the allies ?crossed the Rubicon? and formally decided to prohibit all international import and export trade with the central powers, including that of the neutrals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work