• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the Main Factors Which Led British Governments to Follow a Policy Of

Extracts from this document...


Explain the Main Factors Which Led British Governments to Follow a Policy Of Appeasement in the Period 1931 - March 1938 In this easy I am going to explain why the British Governments followed a policy of appeasement. There are a number of reasons why the British Governments did this. These reasons consist of Britain's fear of war, there economic problems, the public's opinions and many more. I will explain each of these reasons and how they contribute to the British Governments to follow a policy of appeasement. Britain was in no state to go to war because the state of Britain's armed forces was poor. Although the navy was in massive size, the RAF and the Army were much smaller than Germanys so there was a risk of Britain being attacked at land as they where weak in the Army and RAF. ...read more.


Germany and so going to war was not possible and instead of war peace had to be arranged between Britain and Germany. The British public opinion as expressed in general elections and opinion polls reveals strong opposition towards re-armament. In a by-election at East Fulham in October 1933 a pacifist labour candidate gained a seat from a Conservative candidate who campaigned for rearmament. But in 1935 there was a nationwide opinion poll organised by the Peace Pledge Union which showed how unpopular re-armament was with the British public. The crisis put Britain in a tough and dangerous spot as if one small problem was added then Britain would fall apart. ...read more.


This also encouraged German nationalist groups. There were also many provisions i.e. Germany must accept guilt for starting the war, Germany must agree to accept democratic constitution and German fuhrer banned from Rhineland cont. Britain felt guilty for Germany hard punishment and so they where emotional damaged. To stop this from growing the British Government followed a policy of appeasement. The policy of appeasement offered to Neville Chamberlain was to solve German grievances by peaceful negotiation and save Europe from further death and destruction in a second world war. I have explained the main reasons in why the British Governments followed a policy of appeasement. Most of this was due to the fact that Britain was weak in war statues and another war could split its empire. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Explain the Main Factors Which Led British Governments to Follow a Policy of Appeasement ...

    Britain even abandoned free trade and adopted protective tariffs throughout the British Empire. As the economic problems grew, so did Britain chance of going to war with enemy countries i.e.

  2. To what extent was appeasement the correct policy during the 1930s?

    Hitler believed Germany therefore had a right over this particular area of Czechoslovakia and set his sights on it in 1938. However, Britain, France and the USSR had promised to help Czechoslovakia if it was threatened. This placed Czechoslovakia's allies in a difficult position: keep its promises or face Hitler's wrath.

  1. Was the Policy of Appeasement correct?

    However, the major change in Hitler's policy showing that 'the unification of all German people' was only a pretence was the invasion of Czechoslovakia. This area was full of Slavs and they did not speak German. Poland was next so Chamberlain drew the land in the sand and said that

  2. In February 1943, the German Army surrendered at Stalingrad, Was Hitlers interference the main ...

    This therefore meant that the German forces were sucked in and engaged so that the Russians could use there quantities of free men to devise a plan in order to surround them. After the initial attack on Stalingrad the soviet forces re-organised.

  1. To what extent did British public opinion deter British Governments from standing up to ...

    Another reason for this anti-war feeling amongst the British people was the common feeling that the Treaty of Versailles imposed on Germany had been too harsh. Some had predicted the impact of the �6.6 billion reparations, they predicted that it would result in economic chaos in Germany, destabilise trade and lead to an extensive economic disturbance.

  2. Was it the British governments' policy of appeasement which led to war breaking out ...

    This was because they were following a policy of appeasement in desperation to avoid another war. Chamberlain, Britain's prime minister from 1937 until 1940 is most associated with appeasement. He 'loathed war and was well aware of the damage it would do to Britain's prosperity and status in the world.'

  1. War led to totalitarianism, and totalitarianism in turn led to war. Comment on the ...

    The most serious problem next to the nationalist discontent in Germany was de facto economic. The economic chaos was primarily resulted from the Treaty of Versailles. The transfer to France of Alsace-Lorraine, the temporary loss of the highly industrialized Saar district and the ceding to Poland of Upper Silesia with its coal mines, dealt a severe blow to German economy.

  2. "A study of British foreign policy in the 1920's suggests that British governments increasingly ...

    Most Frenchmen, in consequence, felt betrayed. The Big 3 were aware that defiances were made against the treaty of Versailles and this was exactly why, as far as Lloyd George was concerned, the League Of Nations was created. In 1919 he said that the League of Nations would "be there

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work