• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain whether the work of Gandhi during the years 1918-1937 made independence for India more or les likely.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain whether the work of Gandhi during the years 1918-1937 made independence for India more or les likely. In 1857, the East India Company sailed to India and defeated the Mughal Empire. The British crown took over the Indian government and Britons were sent to live there. This was known as colonialism, those who thought it was a good idea to take over others lands and actually did. One of these lands was India. At the time India was seen a savage land. Missionaries and legislators wanted to stamp out slavery, barbaric punishment and sacrifices. Industrialists wanted raw materials such as gold, diamond and chocolate. They wanted to grow and sell food, which could not be grown at home. The armed forces found the country useful as it could use them to fuel ships. The period in which Britain ruled India is known as the British Raj. The king or queens representative in India was called the viceroy. ...read more.

Middle

This meant public opinion would shift on the side of the Indians and so Britain would be pressurised to move out of India. Gandhi's personal actions such as homespun showed he was not above ordinary Indians. This unified them and in doing so became a greater problem for the British Empire, as they knew they all had the same common problem. In 1920, Gandhi launched his first civil disobedience campaign, Homespun. He told Indians to weave their own cotton so not to buy British textiles. He encouraged Indians to burn their British made clothes. The cotton, which was grown in India, was sent to Britain to be manufactured then sent back to India for Indians to buy. If nobody bought British made clothes India would more likely get independence as Britain would find it hard to keep this industry going and so would pull out of India, as no profit would be made. ...read more.

Conclusion

Indians asked for independence soon after the war and that Indians were to be placed on the Viceroy's government. Britain did not give this power and if they did not accept India's help under these serious conditions, when they really needed help, when would they? Gandhi's passive resistance did allow India to gain self-rule during the years 1918-1939, as it showed the brutal side to the British Empire against its unarmed subjects. Reported around the world were horrific scenes of violence which casted the British in a bad light. This allowed the world to see what the British were really like. A more violent approach I think would have caused Britain to think the Indians could not control themselves and so would still be ruling them now, but on the other hand a more savage approach could have led the British into backing off. But this I think would have led to serious casualties. So in all I think Gandhi's work made it more likely for India to gain independence from Britain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. History: India Independence Coursework

    Both sources A and C talk about India wanting to gain its independence. Source C also supports source B which is from the autobiography of Jawarhal Nehru. What Jinnah says in source C, relates to what Nehru says but in a different way.

  2. Public health in Britain during the hundred years from 1850 to 1950

    In the early 1900's the government became increasingly aware of the health problems facing ordinary people. There was still data showing that the poor still lived in terrible housing, and that when they were sick they could not afford medical care.

  1. Describe British rule in India at the end of the First World War.

    The first Government of India act was passed in December 1919 and put into effect The Montagu-Chelmsford Reform which set up a system know as the Dyrachy. To advise the Viceroy an Executive Council was also set up. Then, in 1927, the Simon Commission was selected to evaluate the workings of the Montagu-Chelmsford Reform.

  2. Titus Salt and Saltaire.

    This also shows that she must have had great faith in him, to have stayed with him for so long. He has also named streets after his wife's family, showing that he has thought greatly about his family during the building of the village.

  1. History Extension Major Work- The 1932-33 Bodyline Series

    One is playing cricket and the other is not"35. On the other hand, not everyone believed the way Woodfull approached the series was the right way. Vic Richardson believed that if Woodfull had allowed his bowlers to retaliate to 'bodyline bowling' then the Australians would have won the series.

  2. The object of this coursework is to gather information and data, on how woman ...

    powerful source of media were standing by the woman or were going against them. This article reports that the suffragettes caused a lot of damage, which would cost a lot of money to repair. I feel that this would have angered the public, and as the newspapers had a lot

  1. From a close study of E.M.Forster's "A Passage to India" and Julian Barnes' "A ...

    Another image from the first chapter is the woodworm and this also resurfaces in chapters three, five, eight and nine. Salman Rushdie described the book "as footnotes to history, as subversion of the given...Fiction as a critique". Barnes aims to raise the prospect of uncertainty in his book and does

  2. The events of 1857-8 are extremely significant and have changed India dramatically into the ...

    The accounts of events of 1857 reveal to us that India was not ruled well, was a much divided country and that the citizens in general were not satisfied on being controlled by Britain . Many Indians were very unhappy about the British interfering in Hindu socio-religious affairs and charging them high taxes etc.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work