• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why events in the Balkans contributed to the growth of international tension in the years 1908 - 1914.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain why events in the Balkans contributed to the growth of international tension in the years 1908 - 1914. It is difficult to comprehend how such a small area of the world, of Europe, could cause such tensions, and even, it could be argued, be responsible for the outbreak of World War One. Ruled by the Ottoman Empire, the collection of different races and religions which was collectively known as the Balkans began to rise up against their oppressive rulers due to increased tensions growing (aside from the usual between rulers and ruled) concerning ethnic rivalry. These risings got the attention of other major European countries, especially Russia and Austria - Hungary, who already had a history there. Russia supported the emancipation of the Balkans, being made up of similar ethnic people and a Pan - Slavist Movement vowing to unite all Slavs, many of whom lived in the Balkans. Yet Austria- Hungary did not wish to encourage the collapse of the Ottoman Empire as she feared her own empire, made up of smaller countries like the Ottoman Empire, would be influenced by these uprisings and would start to pursue their own bid for freedom, perhaps resulting in the collapse of their empire as well. ...read more.

Middle

Russia's relations with Austria - Hungary and Germany declined after the Bosnian crisis showed Germany favouring Austria over her, and the opposing views over the Balkans caused increased tension as well. This cemented the alliances further and increasing the possibility of war. Dissatisfaction with Bosnia's situation increased, and plots to free the Bosnian Serbs emerged. Added to this Serbia began to build up relations with Russia, giving Russia the possibility of a warm water port and the confidence to take on Austria - Hungary, ultimately increasing the tension as this caused an upsurge in Balkan Nationalism, especially in Serbia, sponsored by Russia, threatening the stability of the Austro - Hungarian empire and relations with Serbia. Yet despite France and Great Britain's best attempts to maintain peace and stability, the two alliances hardened seemingly making their different alliances concrete. But Britain and France did not have much time to meddle in the problems of others; they had problems of their own, outside of the Balkans. This shows although the Balkans were a major cause of tension in Europe, Wilhelm II was having a pretty good go of stirring up some of his own, by pursuing his Weltpolitik. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also due to the aforementioned Anglo - German rivalry, Great Britain were only too happy to declare war on Germany. Referring back to my introduction, it is hard to see how such small countries can cause such conflict. Yet having looked through the events of those six years it is obvious that although the Balkans were involved in most of the events which caused decline of relations, often they were not the direct cause of this tension(In the Naval Race and Moroccan Crisis they were not involved at all.) Perhaps the fact that they are so small is the exact reason why they caused such trauma. They were under - estimated. It seems that as the Balkans hadn't really been countries in their own right for such a long time, they were too forward in their pursuit for freedom when the opportunity came around. This caused a rapid change in power balance, almost too rapid, throwing the rest of Europe into uncertainty and fear, resulting in a turn of events which split Europe as they all tried to do what they thought was best for Europe, which tended to be very different things, depending on the country. ?? ?? ?? ?? Charlotte McKenna ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Notes on International Relations 1919-1939

    Took away people * Returning Soldier, 1919 - "The most terrible treason in world history the red traitor Ebert signed the Treaty of Versailles" o Germans, including Ebert, didn't like Versailles but Ebert was forced to sign and if he didn't the Allies threatened to continue fighting and invade Germany

  2. "Tension between the countries of Europe increased in year before 1914 due to the ...

    This was due to the policy of Weltpolitik promoted by Kaiser Wilhelm, Von Tirpitz and Von Bulow. Weltpolitik led to a number of crisis due to the arms race. An example is the 2nd Moroccan Crisis in 1911. Germany intervened in French expansion by sending the gunboat "Panther" to Morocco

  1. World War I. 1914-18 timeline of major events in the econflict

    Balkans front 1915 Jan/Feb -Britain looks to Balkans. Entente operation on Dardenelles to take Constantinople. First Brit landing in April- first operation abandoned as was 2nd- troops return Dec Sept- Central Powers, Blugaria joined defeat Serbia. DEC- Brit and Indians land at Basra, Persian gulf to protect oil supplies.

  2. What crisis and developments caused tension to rise from 1905 to 1913? How were ...

    On October 6th 1908, Austria-Hungary annexed Bosnia and Herzegovina, but Austria-Hungary broke the secret deal. They did not give compensation to Russia. Russia felt tricked and disowned by the deal and protested. Serbia reacted to the annexation, they felt very angry at Austria-Hungary's actions.

  1. "William II's foreign policy contributed greatly to tensions in Europebetween 1890 and 1914." Discuss.

    despised Bismarck), the Kaiser advised by the new and inexperienced experts on such matters, and guided by his hatred of all things related to Bismarck, decided to reject signing it. He was convinced that the Reinsurance Treaty was incompatible with the terms of the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Germany), and

  2. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    It intensified armament race Germany thought that a general war was inevitable and accelerated the increase in the strength of the German army. Military leaders were tempted to war. 5. Pan-Germanism and Pan-Slavism conflicted in the Balkans. Conclusion: There were long-laid conflicts before 1913 - e.g.

  1. Why did international peace collapse in 1939?

    they were determined to prevent another war, they were not militarily prepared to fight, their own economic problems felt more important to them, and they were not certain of the support they would receive from the British Empire or the USA, which was in a policy of isolationism.

  2. History Revision notes - International Relations: Why did WW2 break out? 1929-1939

    Furthermore, in September 1935, a speech was made by British foreign secretary, Sir Samuel Hoare, to the assembly of the League calling for collective resistance to Italian aggression. However, this seems to have made little difference to events. In October 1935, the Italian forces invaded Abyssinia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work