• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

Extracts from this document...


Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor. Throughout the Russian revolution, Trotsky always appeared as Lenin's right-hand-man. However, after Lenin's untimely death in 1921 it was Stalin, and not Trotsky who emerged as Lenin's successor. In this essay I am going to investigate why it was Stalin that emerged as Lenin's successor and not Trotsky. I am going to investigate the personalities between the two, their support in the communist party, their policies and their power-bases and to see how these differences would have helped or hindered either Trotsky or Stalin to succeed Lenin. On the 21st of January 1924, when Lenin had died it was Stalin that led the mourning and then made a series of speeches declaring his loyalty to Lenin's ideas. It was Stalin that had Lenin's body embalmed and put on display in Red Square, Moscow. Trotsky was not present at Lenin's funeral because he was on sick leave in the south of the USSR. This was Stalin's first step in succeeding Lenin. Publicly, it appeared that it was Stalin who truly respected and revered Lenin and it was Stalin who had showed the most consideration towards Lenin's efforts in securing the Russian Revolution. ...read more.


While Zinoviev and Kamenev agreed with Trotsky's economical views, they disliked him as a person. Whilst Trotsky was popular among the army and the ordinary members of the Communist party, he was disliked within the Politburo for his vanity and arrogance. Trotsky's personality was also judged by Lenin in his testament published in 1922. Lenin wrote that, "Trotsky...is personally perhaps the most capable man in the present central committee but has displayed excessive self assurance". Trotsky's unpopularity within the Politburo was, I believe, the main cause for Trotsky's failure to succeed Lenin. The dislike the members of the Politburo held for Trotsky, motivated Kamenev, Zinoviev and Stalin to combine to prevent Trotsky from succeeding Lenin. However, Lenin also commented on Stalin's personality in his testament, writing, "Stalin...has unlimited authority in his hands, and I am not sure whether he will always be capable of using that authority with sufficient caution." Lenin later added more criticisms: "Stalin is too rude and this defect is intolerable...I suggest removing Stalin from his post" Lenin suggested replacing Stalin with someone "more tolerant, more loyal, more polite and more considerate". ...read more.


Stalin joined the Rightists in an attempt to drive Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev out of the Politburo. Stalin's position was strengthened when the Party congress elected three of Stalin's close friends and supporters into the Politburo. With their support Stain was able to force Trotsky, Kamenev and Zinoviev from the Politburo in 1925 and later in 1927 Trotsky and Zinoviev were expelled from the Communist Party. His power base helped him to secure leadership of Russia because he was able to eliminate any political opponents and had a large and loyal support base which would support and allow Stalin to do what he wished. In 1928 Stalin became leader of Russia. Stalin public performances contributed to his popularity and his personality did not make him any opponents within the Politburo but these would have not sufficed to succeed Lenin. Therefore, in conclusion I believe that Stalin was able to succeed Lenin primarily because he established a power base within the Communist party that he used to eliminate political opponents and to support any of his decisions through majority votes. A constant throughout Stalin's power struggle was his ruthless drive to become ruler of Russia. Stalin slithered through the communist party, misusing his power to corrupt the integrity of the party so that he may become leader of Russia. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin(TM)s Successor

    Lenin said about Stalin that he had "unlimited authority concentrated in his hands" and suggested that "comrades think about a way of removing Stalin from that post." Stalin was the General Secretary of the Party. Lenin also said that he "is too rude and this defect".

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Stalin was a very paranoid man and as a result of that launched the 'purges'. When he got into power he was worried that some of his rivals might overthrow him. Due to Stalin's paranoia the Communist Party had purged its membership getting rid of all the members who were suspected of being disloyal.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    Concluding the credibility of Source F the fact it was published in Paris, is significant as France was a capitalist country that opposed communism, and thus was against Stalin and his communist policies. One can say the source is biased however, it is much more reliable then source E for a number of reason.

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    I have based this decision on the fact that David Lowe does not once show Stalin in a positive light. To add to that, the writing in the cartoon suggests has an unstable mind is paranoid as well as stupid.

  1. Stalin and Lenin

    Stalin believed that the country should only be run by ne government and that everything must be owned by the government and all distributed evenly, he even started collectivization which he believed would help farmers grow more food, he setup the Secret police in order to secretly eliminate his opponents

  2. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    He is described as a�� narrow -minded and a malicious man.�� This description has a lot of truth in it because Stalin himself gave us that evidence when he decided to introduce collectivisation, knowing that many peasants refused the idea.

  1. In this essay I am going to asses the impact that Stalin had on ...

    Instead of making profits by selling their grain at market, peasants would sell their grain to the government at a fixed low price. They would receive wages for their work. Collective farms consisted of 50 to 100 families, together farming an average 450 hectares of land.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    To the bureaucrat and the policeman (and some historians whose mental processes function on the same wavelength) this seems like a strange and threatening madness. In fact, it is precisely the opposite. In such situations, men and women cease to act like automatons and begin to behave like real human beings with a mind and a will.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work