• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why the League of Nations failed to deal with the Manchuria and Abyssinia Crises in the 1920/30s

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain why the league failed to deal with the Manchuria and Abyssinia Crises in the 1920/30s The 1920s showed the League of Nations to be a weak force when dealing with the problems of bigger countries, as shown by the Japanese invasion of Manchuria and the Italian invasion of Abyssinia. The two main countries in the league were more concerned about their own interests rather than trying to uphold the morals of the League, and actions that were decided were disrupted by the fact that the League could not agree what actions to take. Most importantly, the absence of the USA meant that the League was made useless. The fact that the USA was not in the League is the most important reason for the failure of the League in dealing with both crises. ...read more.

Middle

to try to benefit economically as there was no disadvantage to doing so, especially the two dominating countries in the League Britain and France. Out of the remaining countries that were in the League Britain and France were the two dominating countries. The fact that both these countries were more interested about their own problems rather than the problems the League was supposed to deal with showed another weakness of the League in dealing with the two crises. One example of this is the Hoare-Laval pact, an attempt by Britain and France to try to secure Mussolini as their ally against Hitler, without permission from the League. The fact that this was organised without the League?s knowledge showed that bigger countries were willing to ignore the process of the League, and did not care what implications there would be as long as they were able to get what they wanted. ...read more.

Conclusion

This made the League slow in deciding what actions to take against Japan with Manchuria where the Lytton report took over a year, and did not show any conclusive results. Sanctions could not be decided against Italy, and this also lead to the Suez Canal being left open for Italy to use in their attacks. Both crises showed the League to be slow and inefficient in dealing with crises involving large countries such as Japan and Italy. Overall the most important reason for the League?s failure to deal with the Manchuria and Abyssinia crises is the fact that the USA was not present in the League, leaving the remaining dominant countries to use the League in a self-interested way, and causing the League to be slow in dealing with both of the crises, and being unable to deal with the crises effectively. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why did it take so long for the League to make a decision over ...

    His terrible smile seems like telling other people how powerful he is, that he can kill as many people as he wants. He's standing at the top of all the corps to show that he's the best, the tallest, the one who has the biggest power.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    There was no question of who was going to win. One of the main reasons for this was that the league was at least seen to do the right thing in the Manchurian crisis as they condemned Japan for invading and although they didn't do anything about it they did, in the end, came to the right decision.

  1. Japanese Invade Manchuria

    This meant that Turkey would be thankful to the League, therefore it turned one of the Allies onto there side, which therefore meant that Turkey would not fight against the League in another World War as the League helped them tremendously. Secondly, the League improved working conditions in many countries.

  2. The failure of the League of Nations

    closing the canal could have resulted in a war with Italy and they wanted to avoid breaking their alliance with Italy at all costs. The British foreign minister Hoare and the French Prime minister Laval made up a secret deal with Mussolini called 'the Hoare-Laval pact'.

  1. Why the League of Nations Failed?

    The amount was set �6600million in 1921. Woodrow Wilson the American president was an idealist he believed in finding the perfect solution. He had plans to make sure that a Second World War wouldn't break out. He set up fourteen points that he believed that those points would definitely prevent another war.

  2. Why the League Of Nations Failed in the 1930’s

    how the League was powerless to do anything over such a large distance. The League was given arguments by China and Japan and there was truth in both of them, so it decided to set up a Commission of inquiry under Lord Lytton and was sent to the area to gather information and produce a report.

  1. The New Deal

    he was so understanding that he could have he could have been sat right next to them by the fireside hence 'fireside chats.' Roosevelt was always giving speeches and informing the public of his actions. Roosevelt skilfully used his inaugural address to reassure the American people that 'the only thing

  2. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    first case when the original constitution of the League was broken and an allied city lost it's independence'. Thucydides suggests that the revolts such as those undertaken by Carystus and Naxos were due to the harsh system of finances used to support the league - 'The chief reasons for these

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work