• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why the League of Nations failed to deal with the Manchuria and Abyssinia Crises in the 1920/30s

Extracts from this document...


Explain why the league failed to deal with the Manchuria and Abyssinia Crises in the 1920/30s The 1920s showed the League of Nations to be a weak force when dealing with the problems of bigger countries, as shown by the Japanese invasion of Manchuria and the Italian invasion of Abyssinia. The two main countries in the league were more concerned about their own interests rather than trying to uphold the morals of the League, and actions that were decided were disrupted by the fact that the League could not agree what actions to take. Most importantly, the absence of the USA meant that the League was made useless. The fact that the USA was not in the League is the most important reason for the failure of the League in dealing with both crises. ...read more.


to try to benefit economically as there was no disadvantage to doing so, especially the two dominating countries in the League Britain and France. Out of the remaining countries that were in the League Britain and France were the two dominating countries. The fact that both these countries were more interested about their own problems rather than the problems the League was supposed to deal with showed another weakness of the League in dealing with the two crises. One example of this is the Hoare-Laval pact, an attempt by Britain and France to try to secure Mussolini as their ally against Hitler, without permission from the League. The fact that this was organised without the League?s knowledge showed that bigger countries were willing to ignore the process of the League, and did not care what implications there would be as long as they were able to get what they wanted. ...read more.


This made the League slow in deciding what actions to take against Japan with Manchuria where the Lytton report took over a year, and did not show any conclusive results. Sanctions could not be decided against Italy, and this also lead to the Suez Canal being left open for Italy to use in their attacks. Both crises showed the League to be slow and inefficient in dealing with crises involving large countries such as Japan and Italy. Overall the most important reason for the League?s failure to deal with the Manchuria and Abyssinia crises is the fact that the USA was not present in the League, leaving the remaining dominant countries to use the League in a self-interested way, and causing the League to be slow in dealing with both of the crises, and being unable to deal with the crises effectively. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The failure of the League of Nations

    As a result they were reluctant to get involved in collective security (one of the reasons why Britain and France were reluctant to commit troops to fight for the League of Nations) and their League could not make powerful countries obey their rulings or enforce sanctions.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.


    Surely if the aims of Athens' reformed league have been for filled, it would have seemed only fair to cancel the contributions. Athens may have intended on continuing the contributions so as to be safe and assured for her future security, or even for her own personal intentions (the rebuilding of her temples and walls).

  2. Why the League of Nations Failed?

    The amount was set �6600million in 1921. Woodrow Wilson the American president was an idealist he believed in finding the perfect solution. He had plans to make sure that a Second World War wouldn't break out. He set up fourteen points that he believed that those points would definitely prevent another war.

  1. (A) Explain the main features of the New Deal?

    This organisation provided jobs and work on the environment. When Roosevelt was appointed his main aim was to protect people's savings and their properties. To protect their savings and properties Roosevelt decided to close the banks because, during the depression banks were going bankrupt and with Roosevelt having this knowledge he decided to get all banks closed until they were fully checked by his advisors.

  2. Japanese Invade Manchuria

    But in the long run it completely failed as it could not do its main aim of preventing another World War, but instead there was one. It showed that it wasn't a failure as it did very good work in getting refugees and former prisoners of war back to their homelands.

  1. Why did it take so long for the League to make a decision over ...

    And he might be France. The source 7 tells us the position of the League. The League seems really big, but it's very weak. The Japan is the smallest but is the most powerful one, because he can even stand on the League.

  2. Explain why the League of Nations failed to stop the Japanese invasion of Manchuria

    league and showed the League?s weaknesses when Japan walked out following the announcement of the report.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work