• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

F Bommber Command decisive in bringing about victrory for Britan WW2

Extracts from this document...


Was the contribution of RAF Bomber Command decisive in bringing about the defeat of Germany? Bombing cities was always a controversial tactic as early as 1917 when a fleet of German Gotha bombers bombarded the costal town of Folkestone killing 95 people and injuring 175. This initial attack on Britain was the first major air offensive targeting the civilian population. This sparked the British population and government into understanding the realisation of a bombing offensive. In 1925 the government produced a projection of civilian casualties in the event of an attack by the French Air Force, the results were shocking an estimated 5,000 people would be killed or wounded in the first 24 hours. It was these results accompanied with other evidence that led the Prime minister, Stanley Baldwin, to state in the houses of parliament that "the bomber will always get through". This consensus explains why the government and the RAF invested the lion's share of available money on RAF Bomber Command rather that Fighter Command. However the question still remains whether this investment was justified and if it was money well spent. ...read more.


The main reason that area bombing was introduced was to affect the morale of the civilians so that German citizens would not support the war thus causing strikes and affecting the German economy. Striking action by industrial workers (caused by the Royal Navy blockade) in Germany was one of the major reasons why Germany surrendered in World War One, however, no such action happened in World War Two and in fact the bombing of German cities seemed to bring German people together and strengthen their resolve again Britain. Even Fredrick Lindermann one of William Churchill's scientific advisors said in a report "that such a policy (of bombing) can only have a decisive effect if carried out on a much bigger scale." All of this bombing with little reward cost 55,573 servicemen's lives from a total of 125,000 aircrew (a 44.4% mortality rate), a further 8,403 were wounded in action and 9,838 became prisoners of war. A Bomber Command crewmember had a worse chance of survival than an infantry officer in World War I. The main reason for such high casualties was because of effective German defence methods such as; search lights, flack guns effective radars (Freya and Wurzburg radars), blackouts, dummy factories and dummy cities. ...read more.


Bomber Command took many photos of the bombs that they had dropped in order the assess the damage that they had created, however from photos it is hard to gauge damage to equipment inside factories, even if the factory looks flattened the equipment inside may still be operable. Another major problem is Bomber Command's statistics, as Winston Churchill did not allow a survey to assess damage and casualties, as he did not want to rake over these controversial issues in order to try and maintain popularity. Furthermore evidence may have been changed by generals on both sides to maximise the effectiveness of there own area of war. To conclude RAF Bomber Command was a major help in the Allied war effort, but not decisive in bringing about the defeat of Germany. I believe this because I feel there were more important factors that led to the defeat of Germany, such as the Battle of the Atlantic that introduced the USA into the war. Moreover, area bombing did not have the desired effect that Sir Arthur Harris envisaged as German wartime production increased year on year until the third quarter of 1944, and German citizens seems to be brought closer together in the aftermath of a bombing raid, thus suggesting that the main objectives of Bomber Command failed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    However I do also think that Dunkirk was a natural and morale victory as well. I feel that it was a natural victory due to the amount of men saved during operation Dynamo. Operation Dynamo exceeded all expectation initial the government figures expected to save 40,000 men but the actual total of saved was 340,000 this was an extraordinary fete.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    This was, however, not the case. Haig thought that the Germans were near to collapse so why change the tactics. In September, Haig sent out fifty tanks into battle. However, some tanks got stuck in the mud and twenty-nine broke down before they reached the battlefield.

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    These figures some up the rescue operation that took place in Dunkirk, and show fully what a victory it was. These are well-informed statistics, and primary evidence. However they are selective figures and give no indication into the casualties from Dunkirk, or how much equipment was lost.

  2. Should the statue of Arthur "Bomber" Harris be put up?

    Is it ever right to kill 40,000 people, make one million homeless and destroy almost 75% of the city, all on one night? However, some people may say that the bombing was justified because Germans and the Allies both bombed enemy towns and cities.

  1. Evacuation in WW2

    Ironically just before those bombs were dropped, parents started to bring their children back to the city, not knowing what danger was just coming. Then once the bombs did drop, the parents wanted to send their children back to the countryside, but some of the people didn't accept them back because they felt like they were being used.

  2. To what ways and to what extent did the lives of the British people ...

    We also know that D6 is reliable because it is backed up by the documentary 'Bombs at Bedtime' where one man admits how he wanted to run away from the fighting.

  1. Was Britain well prepared for WW2?

    General Ironside organised as large defence scheme and Merchant Taylor's adapted and took on these schemes. Source A shows that the school had "special trapdoors" and "air raid alarms" indicating that they knew what to do in emergencies and "everyone" was in the "OTC" showing that it was a large effort in which everybody could help.

  2. World War 2

    The aerodromes which on the brink of being destroyed, and if they were attacked again, there would be little chance of the RAF being able to continue fighting, possibly resulting in the loss of the war. As Britain was not knocked out by Germany here, it meant that Germany would

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work