• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Student Protesters in the 1960s were just a bunch of kids rebelling against their parents views. How far do the sources support this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Student Protesters in the 1960's were just a bunch of kids rebelling against their parents views. " How far do the sources support this statement? This sources display a wide variety of information relating to the protest movements by students. Source A shows figures of student enrolment in the USA. These figures clearly show that more women are attending university as time progresses - 1 a12% rise from 1947 to 1970. This could represent that women are moving away from their engrained 'stay at home' lives and are wishing to advance in life. However, this source does not specify the age of the students or how many of the students complete their courses, but the underlying message is still that more people wish to break from their pre-defined moulds of the earlier generation. ...read more.

Middle

However, this does raise the alarming issue that they are changing for changes sake, and not because of a specific need. Source D, an interview, reinforces the belief that it is protest for protests sake, because the person being interviewed refuses to make any concession or give any grace to previous generations. They state: 'I reject everything that my father stands for'. This casts doubt on the aims of the movement and the integrity of those who took part and led it. Source A, a US television interview, shows a better light on the movement. It accurately states that the protests got more violent, especially after 'King and the Kennedy's were assassinated. This particular source highlights the importance of specific public figures, as had previously been shown in the Civil Rights Movement with individuals such as Rosa Parks. ...read more.

Conclusion

The benefit of doing such things other than to draw attention to the union in a negative light is unclear, although it should be noted that not all of the protesters chose to take part in such direct activities. This is shown in Source C, from America Divided: the Civil War of the 1960's , where people like Tom Hayden encourages people to protest with 'Viet Cong' placards or flags proclaiming their disdain for the war. However, Source C also shows the continuing trend that by the mid 1960s, violence had spiralled out of hand and protesters called for people to 'Stand in front of a troop train'. In conclusion, it could be seen that the aim of the Student Protests in the 1960s was well laid out and organized to focus on anti-war or pro-love tactics, but as the years progressed it quickly became a reality where violence was common and protests meant little except loss of life. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The author demonstrates strong comprehension of the source material throughout but the response is weakened because the specific question has not been addressed. The response could be further strengthened by cross -referencing source material and extending the points on provenance. 3 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 08/10/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Who was to blame for the Cold War?

    4 star(s)

    Stalin planned to establish friendly satellite governments in all Soviet conquered countries, which threatened the western powers. The United States had a mindset of greatness and aloofness. This outlook differed from the Soviet attitude mainly because the United States stood apart from Europe and its problems.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was America justified in dropping the atom bomb on Hiroshima in August 1945?

    3 star(s)

    The destruction cause by the bomb is one major justification for why it should not have been used. Another justification to why the bomb should not have been dropped is that Japan was already about to surrender. One historian, Mark Weber, writes how unnecessary the bomb was, saying, "By any rational yardstick, they were not.

  1. Did life improve for black people after the abolition of slavery?

    Martin Luther King started freedom rides and published his own story about freedom. He also travelled around India to learn more about Gandhi's views on non-violent protests. His views on the abolition of slavery were that it was a great idea.

  2. Civil rights movement - questions and answers.

    The Ku Klux Klan stirred up hatred and prejudice against blacks, Jews and Catholics. Klan members swore an oath of loyalty to America and to fight any cause government people sector ruler than is foreign to the USA. (Quoted from Modern America PG 27).

  1. The Civil Rights Movement Project

    So in 1963, Martin Luther King organised marches and demonstrations that ensured loads of television coverage. The local policeman was extremely anti-black, so set dogs on the demonstrators when the rest of the demonstrators refused to leave he turned the five hoses on them.

  2. Blacks were substantially better off in 1877 than they had been in 1863.' How ...

    This didn't matter too much that the President was against the ex-slaves gaining political rights and economic stability because the Radical Republicans at the time had a majority in Congress. They were the main reason for what little political success the African-Americans had during Reconstruction.

  1. To what extent did black Civil Rights improve in the years between 1863-1877?

    In terms of social progression, the blacks sacrificed integration for independence. With the 13th amendment prohibiting slavery, and the14th amendment granting them freedom of movement, and with the integration naturally afforded by that movement lawfully granted, it was expected that blacks and whites would begin to interact again within a newly structured society.

  2. The importance of Lyndon Johnson in bringing about Civil Rights.

    He was very highly influenced by the political repercussions of his actions, and in some cases even changed his own political ideas to match the political ideas that were the most likely to gain him support. For example, Johnson publicly opposed the civil rights bill of 1957, proposed by President

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work