• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In 1815 the possibility of a united Italy was slight(TM) to what extent do you agree with this?

Extracts from this document...


'In 1815 the possibility of a united Italy was slight' to what extent do you agree with this? There are many arguments for and against the possibility of a united Italy. In this essay I am going to look at these arguments and conclude from the information I gather, to what extent I agree with the above statement. In 1815 Italy was made up of five separate states, most of these states were run very harshly. They all had different leaders, individual codes of law and had very different views. This would make uniting Italy very difficult as it would be almost impossible to please every state and its leader. There were also a number of different languages spoken; this meant that communication was very difficult. French and Latin were spoken while the Austrian leaders spoke in German, and many different states had their own dialects. ...read more.


Among the middle classes though the view of politics was very different and in fact by 1815, there were many new political ideas starting to spread. There was a widespread feeling that Italy needed a Risorgimento and that with this there may become a much more powerful Italy. This backed up the possibility of an Italian unification. Unification would have been made difficult as most people believed that being patriotic was being loyal to the state that they live in rather than Italy itself. People would see themselves as a Tuscan or a Neapolitan rather than an Italian. The Roman Catholic Church had also regained its influence of Italy by 1850 and would attempt to stop any type of Italian unification. The church was very conservative and was able to put its strong views across to a very large audience. Despite this others in Italy, in particular the middle classes, started to believe in new political ides which included Nationalism and Liberalism. ...read more.


At the time there was also something called the holy alliance which was made up of Austria, Russia and Prussia. They were uninterested in the problems faced by people because of there rulers and disliked anything that even hinted to a revolution. Even the more sympathetic countries such as Britain and France were in no position to help. From the information I have gathered I conclude that I agree with the statement to a certain extent but not entirely. There are many reasons that the chance of a United Italy are slight and these reasons generally outweigh the arguments that its not. Most of the arguments against the statement also only hinder the arguments for it rather than exclude them completely. However even with this I fell that the way in which many of the states were run, soon enough the people would look to push for a United Italy as it would definitely be in their own personal interests. ?? ?? ?? ?? Chris Webb Page 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. To what extent was the Irish Famine merely an excuse for Peel to repeal ...

    Sir Robert Peel was quoted to say "No minister ever stood, or could stand, against public opinion." 1Although Peel was directly referring to ministers, the same is true of the landed classes, the support for the repeal of the corn laws was infinitely more than the support for the retention of the class legislature.

  2. To what extent wasBritain Romanised

    They thresh their corn, and then store it in vast granaries." One of Caesar's reasons for invading Britain was to gain access to the Celts' large stores of food which Strabo mentioned. With the population of the Roman Empire growing steadily, and the state encouraging large families, more food had to be produced to feed the people.

  1. William was successful at Hastings because of his leadership of the Normans.(TM) To what ...

    The English also had their own problems. The English had lost thousands of men at Fulford and Stamford Bridge which meant that the English army was severely depleted. Because men were lost, so were weapons which meant that the army was under equipped.

  2. Why was Bletchley Park able to break the German Enigma codes

    boost the morale at the park, he said 'the Geese that lay the Golden Eggs and never cackle".

  1. To what extent and why did Machiavelli’s views on politics and human nature in ...

    its citizens'3 and would keep Italy free from foreign occupation and invasion. His guidelines would prove to be offensive to so many because they were truths that had not been seen on paper before and they went against contemporary thinking In the mid-sixteenth century medieval thinking still prevailed with the

  2. How Did the Views and the Arguments put forward by Supporters and opponents of ...

    So overall, the Klan itself was at one point immigrants and has no such right to threaten and scare people into thinking they do not belong in America. 'I lift my lamp beside the Golden Door', a quote from the Poem about the Statue of Liberty.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work