• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In 1815 the possibility of a united Italy was slight(TM) to what extent do you agree with this?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'In 1815 the possibility of a united Italy was slight' to what extent do you agree with this? There are many arguments for and against the possibility of a united Italy. In this essay I am going to look at these arguments and conclude from the information I gather, to what extent I agree with the above statement. In 1815 Italy was made up of five separate states, most of these states were run very harshly. They all had different leaders, individual codes of law and had very different views. This would make uniting Italy very difficult as it would be almost impossible to please every state and its leader. There were also a number of different languages spoken; this meant that communication was very difficult. French and Latin were spoken while the Austrian leaders spoke in German, and many different states had their own dialects. ...read more.

Middle

Among the middle classes though the view of politics was very different and in fact by 1815, there were many new political ideas starting to spread. There was a widespread feeling that Italy needed a Risorgimento and that with this there may become a much more powerful Italy. This backed up the possibility of an Italian unification. Unification would have been made difficult as most people believed that being patriotic was being loyal to the state that they live in rather than Italy itself. People would see themselves as a Tuscan or a Neapolitan rather than an Italian. The Roman Catholic Church had also regained its influence of Italy by 1850 and would attempt to stop any type of Italian unification. The church was very conservative and was able to put its strong views across to a very large audience. Despite this others in Italy, in particular the middle classes, started to believe in new political ides which included Nationalism and Liberalism. ...read more.

Conclusion

At the time there was also something called the holy alliance which was made up of Austria, Russia and Prussia. They were uninterested in the problems faced by people because of there rulers and disliked anything that even hinted to a revolution. Even the more sympathetic countries such as Britain and France were in no position to help. From the information I have gathered I conclude that I agree with the statement to a certain extent but not entirely. There are many reasons that the chance of a United Italy are slight and these reasons generally outweigh the arguments that its not. Most of the arguments against the statement also only hinder the arguments for it rather than exclude them completely. However even with this I fell that the way in which many of the states were run, soon enough the people would look to push for a United Italy as it would definitely be in their own personal interests. ?? ?? ?? ?? Chris Webb Page 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. William was successful at Hastings because of his leadership of the Normans.(TM) To what ...

    He also lost control of his army a number of times failing to stop his army chasing a decoy Norman retreat. Of course the English were cut down by the Norman cavalry after being drawn off the hill and there was nothing Harold could do from his position.

  2. To what extent was the Irish Famine merely an excuse for Peel to repeal ...

    Understanding why the Corn Laws were introduced allows us to understand further why Prime Minister Sir Robert Peel repealed them in 1846. There is strong evidence that some groups of poor people were considering and even preparing for revolution, and if they had rebelled it was evident that the poor stood a very good chance of being victorious.

  1. How Did the Views and the Arguments put forward by Supporters and opponents of ...

    This quote is meaning that anyone has a right to live in America, and if they were real Americans they would oblige to this. The Klan feared that immigrants could bring new ideas to America maybe outclassing their own and resulting in their ideas being bad.

  2. To what extent and why did Machiavelli’s views on politics and human nature in ...

    He believed politics had 'its own laws of existence'5 separate from the Church. Up until Machiavelli wrote 'The Prince,' politicians and rulers wanted not only the Church but also the people they ruled to believe they were moral and ethical, more concerned with being good on earth so they would pass to heaven in the next life.

  1. Why was Bletchley Park able to break the German Enigma codes

    Germans never found out that the Enigma had been broken therefore the British could continue to break the codes and discover important information. Due to many facts Bletchley Park was able to break down the German Enigma codes, and the people who worked there played a major role in helping win the war.

  2. To what extent wasBritain Romanised

    became one state: "Britannia", a province of the Roman Empire. Food and agriculture In the 1st Century BC, agriculture was the main occupation for the Celtic tribes, particularly in the southern regions. Strabo, a Greek geographer who visited Britain in around 30 BC, commented on their agricultural practises: "The inhabitants are fed on millet and herbs, fruits and roots.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work