• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Factsheet on imperial russia

Extracts from this document...


Fact Sheet on imperial Russia Intro Before the Bolsheviks took over Russia in 1917, Russia was under an autocratic ruling system. If you look at a map Russia is about 100 times the size of the United Kingdom. The ruling system was poor, some may argue about this. Since Russia was so big would it really be the Tsar Nicholas II's fault? To try and solve that question, there will be four sections to give some reasoning to people's thoughts. Geography: Russia's geography not only made the temperature of Russia uninhabitable, the temperature in some places made it difficult very difficult, basically impossible for crops to grow since some of Russia is in the Arctic Circle. Most of the inhabitants of Russia lived on the border of Russia. (The map of Russia below shows the population density of different parts of Russia.) The fact that the size of Russia was so big made it even harder for the Tsar to give commands to his country. Since Russia was so large it shared a lot of borders with a few countries, some people from other countries would cross the border into Russia with different languages and cultures. This in a way could help the Tsar because he might've had more allies (http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/commonwealth/ussr_pop_1974.jpg) since his country had people from other countries living there. But when it was time for the army to complete orders and try to find resources in certain parts of Russia, it would be difficult because ...read more.


Others thought that the only reason Tsar Nicholas II wanted to go to war was to distract the people from the obvious problem of food shortage, poverty, inequality, poor working conditions etc. but world war I only caused more poverty and food shortages, not to mention the large amount of military casualties. Not only was Tsar Nicholas II indecisive but he also inherited a lot of his fathers problems when he became Tsar. Social Issues: Russia in 1914 definitely had a large difference in social classes. The Photo below shows us an example of a social class pyramid. As you can see the Tsar is on the top by himself and the peasants are on the bottom. In between there is the nobles after the Tsar, then the church, military and merchants. The pyramid shows how the population and power worked, the pyramid sort of works like the less of one kind of social status the more power. For example there are a lot of serfs, so they have less power. There is only one Tsar so he has a lot of power. Eventually people realized that that was all unfair and that the serfs could actually overthrow the Tsar. The Tsar had absolute ruling of Russia, technically everything that happened in Russia was under the Tsars responsibility. Tsar Nicholas II was interested in bringing the mediaeval idea of the Tsar and his people. ...read more.


There were demonstrations of people wanting food but were very badly dealt with by the authorities. That triggered the 1905 revolution. Just as people thought things couldn't get worse in 1906 Russia had a great problem with harvest, their crops were falling from 12.8 million metric tons in 1905 to 9.9 million in 1906, oats from 12.0 million to 8.8 million, potatoes from 27.6 million to 25.1 million. Later the peasants pay increased by 100% which would normally be a very good thing, except for the fact that the costs of food and living supplies sky rocketed to 300% more than before. Most people in the agricultural business were leaving to go to the cities in search for better jobs, but they weren't enough jobs to give to everyone, and if they weren't filled, well, they weren't offering a very good pay. In Russia the main industries were agricultural and the heavy industries such as metal industries. Russia was in debt, the agriculture was growing badly, and the amount of Jobs wasn't enough for the growing population. Conclusion: Times like this you wonder, what did Tsar Nicholas II do to help Russia? Well, the things mentioned just now aren't entirely Tsar Nicholas II fault, so you couldn't really blame him for having inherited a country that was very large, or already in debt, but we can blame him for making matters a little worse than they already were. And being a tad bit full of himself thinking that he could beat the Japanese with only his strategy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin man or monster

    unlike source I where the executor could be seen in the distance. Other agreements of this source include the fact of promoting capitalism by criticizing the leader of the soviet union who removed any independent thinking to his citizens, and again the extent of this differs from source to source

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    The October Revolution attempted to transform all this, showing the way forward to the workers everywhere and preparing the road for the world socialist revolution. Despite the immense problems and obstacles, the planned economy revolutionised the productive forces in the USSR and laid the basis for a modern economy.

  1. The Romanovs had ruled Russia since 1613

    The period was known as the "Stolypin period." In 1911, Stolypin was assassinated with the Tsar losing his most skilful advisor. World War I broke out in August 1914 - perhaps saving the tsarist government from a major revolutionary outburst. Russia fought with its allies, France and Britain.

  2. History - Russia

    For instance both sources agree on the shooting - ''decided to execute, by shooting, Nikolai Romanov (Source I)''. Henceforth, if more than one Source suggests that guns were involved, with both coming from conflicting perspectives, it improves its trustworthiness by a fair amount.


    As it is stated, "Nicholas I denied to crown himself as a Polish monarch and instead continued to limit the liberties of Poland." (Encyclopedia, Nicholas I of Russia). Tsar Nicholas I of Russia, was born on July 6, 1796 in Russia.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    This photo again arouses suspicion. We have to remember that Stalin eliminated thirteen Generals and two thirds of the Red Army during his purges. This would therefore tell us that it is most likely that it was before this or the photograph was stage managed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work