• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

feel there are both points for and against Haig being the "butcher of the Somme" Haig's aims were to reduce German morale and raise British morale, to break out of the trenches

Extracts from this document...


History coursework: F "Haig is an uncaring General who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good reason" this is a statement which is believed by many people. I feel that after studying all the sources at hand that this statement is both true and false. To a certain extent I believe that there are some things that Haig could have done better. Others would say he was completely useless and didn't do anything right in the whole time he was in charge, but some people would say he was great and probably the best architect of the allied victory. When looking at source A, we can see that Haig knew what was going to happen and he tried to get the nation to accept what was going to happen and that they must expect to see large numbers of casualties. Looking at source B, we can see Haig's account of what is going on during the battle. These are two extracts written by Haig; one before the attack and one is a report on the days attack. Here we are told what Haig thought of the situation, "very successful attack this morning." He says this in good confidence followed by, "all went like clockwork." ...read more.


Source E is written only a year after the battle, it is showing the views of soldiers before they were sent to the front line. When studying world war one, most people are shocked to find that the Generals were often 50 miles away from the front line and this is exactly what the cartoon is trying to show, it shows us that because Haig is to far away it could mean that he doesn't care about his solders and army, all he wants to do is gain as much land as possible and make it look as if the attack was going well so that he can keep his job. Moving on to source F, we look at an extract from a book called, "British Butchers and Bunglers of World Wars", this means that whoever wrote the book was probably against Haig and though he was a butcher or he might even had liked Haig, but thought he was a good source to put into a book like that because Haig had so many people against him and so many things that people good criticize him for. The next source (source G) is a good source to have because it comes straight from the Germans themselves. ...read more.


In conclusion to my essay I feel there are both points for and against Haig being the "butcher of the Somme" Haig's aims were to reduce German morale and raise British morale, to break out of the trenches, relieve pressure on the French at Verdun and most of all try and bring the war to an end. Well what he did was kill many of Germany's most experienced soldiers meaning that the German morale was disturbed, because of this the British felt they had a better chance of winning now thus meaning a morale boost. As for relieving pressure on the French, this was probably Haig's biggest achievement because had he not done this then the Germans would have taken over Verdun and then most of France - leading to a 90% chance of the Allies in with a running chance of winning and he also weakened the Germans. My personal view is that Haig led to the winning of the war and that he was not butcher of but there will always be people who will disagree, but the question we are left with that no one can answer is :- Did, what Haig achieve warrant the death of so many Allied troops? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    Also, I believe strongly that Haig wasn't at fault for using the tanks at that stage of the war, but it was the way they were used. It was thought that if the artillery bombarded the enemies defences, the tanks would be able to steam right through them.

  2. World War 1-Life in the Trenches

    This left the soldiers devastated as the rats ate their friends. The only two sources that talk about the rats describe how sometimes they grew 'as big as rats'. They also managed to be under the blankets beside the soldiers when they woke up at night.

  1. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    This may be incorrect if George were to be afraid of Haig, this may not be his true if George did not want to reveal his true opinion. Source J is very negative about Haig's plans, despite it is written by Lloyd George (the previous source).

  2. Was Haig the butcher of the Somme?

    He said that the barbed wire had never been cut so well, the artillery had never been so well prepared .All the commanders were fully confident. These are from sources 1 and 2. Source % is one of the soldier's views who were out on the field, it is from an interview with Private George Coppard.

  1. was haig butcher of the somme

    The German casualties have been greater than ours." Part of a report written in December 1916, sent by Haig to the British Cabinet about the aftermath of the Battle of the Somme To a degree, Haig was correct. There is evidence that the German soldiers were disheartened by the Battle of the Somme.

  2. The Somme - source related study.

    In the second part of the Source the MPs threaten the men as we've heard. This would have been contributory to the slow puncture of zest. We are told that after the strong reprimand, the group "was split between excitement and the wanting to be home with their mothers."

  1. Field Marshall Haig: "The butcher of the Somme?" - source related study.

    Once I have read sources B and C, I feel as if source C is the most reliable as it is a primary source and it is from someone who was actually there experiencing the torture. Whereas we know that source B is all Haig's accounts and experiences, I

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of The Somme'?

    Those who were aware were either to afraid to speak out, or felt that they owed the men serving under them this time of happiness before marching into the hell that awaited them (this strange guilt complex is shown in Sebastian Faulks' book "Birdsong").

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work