• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Field Marshal Haig - source based answers.

Extracts from this document...


FIELD MARSHAL HAIG: THE BUTCHER OF THE SOMME A// Source A was written by Haig in June 1916 shortly before the Somme. We can see that Haig is speaking about the nation but we don't who to. He is saying that the nation must be taught to bear losses, we see from this and the fact that it was written before the battle, that he knows there is going to be losses and is making excuses for himself. He goes on to say that nothing could possibly enable victories without the 'sacrifice' of men's lives. He uses the word sacrifice, the act of giving up something valued for a greater good, in other words he is using the men as tools like pawns on a chess board to get at the enemy and protect the king. This shows that he doesn't really care for them and that he is willing to send them to their deaths. The final sentence of his writing says that the nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists, Rawlinson predicts to see 10,000 men a day die. Haig is saying that his plan will see the slaughter of many innocent men. Source B is split into two parts both written by Haig, the first written the day before the attack, the second on the first day. In the previous source Haig is saying that the nation must be ready for losses however in this source nothing is mentioned about casualties at all. ...read more.


It is of no use to a historian at all. The source takes the mickey out of everything we know about the attack and the war as a whole as it is designed to do. Source E is a cartoon published in a British newspaper months after the attack. It shows a major general addressing the men before a practise attack behind enemy lines. It portrays the Tommy's feelings about the officer's part in the war and the way they felt towards being pushed around. The source is a comic cartoon designed to get around the defence of the realms act (DORA) by not naming the major general as Haig but instead just leaving him for the public to name. The cartoon has deeper meaning than just British humour; it is letting out the horrible truth about the war and the way it is run by officers who don't set foot in the trenches. This cartoon is of more use to a historian as it is from the time shortly after the Somme and shows how newspapers try to get the truth out. It helps historians know how the British Tommy's and citizens felt about the war and its officers. D// Source F is from a recent British book entitled 'British Butchers and Bunglers of World War' it is written to show the bad ways that commanders destroyed their armies and lost their battles. ...read more.


Haig's reports from the first day of the attack in source B say that everything went well, this is evidence of him reporting false information, as the first day was the worst day of the attack, so Haig has showed us that he has something to hide 'very successful attack this morning...the battle is going very well for us and already the Germans are surrendering freely'. The battle did lift the pressure on Verdun and by the end the Germans had suffered casualties of around 600,000, it is said that the battle of the Somme was the reason for the allied victory in the war. One British commander in source H sees Haig as 'one of the main architects of the allied victory' he says that the battle broke 'Germany's spirit of resistance' and had the 'purpose of 'breaking down the powers of resistance...both morally and physically'. So it seems Haig wasn't just sending them into their deaths, he had planned to send them in expecting little to no resistance, but the waiting force was not that, so Haig adjusted his plans and continued the attack, to his cost, but also to secure the victory and relief of Verdun. Haig engineered the battle to fit the situation and although many soldiers died under his command he achieved his main goal and managed to discourage German troops and officials, he was 'one of the main architects of the allied victory'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    When World War I began in August 1914, the Italian government brushed aside the allied powers and proceeded to support the central powers. Subsequently, after having signed the secret Treaty of London with the Allied powers, Italy declared war

  2. Was General Haig a bad leader, source based

    Overall from the collection of two sources I believe there is fairly enough evidence for both for and against Keegan's statement however there are only two sources. From the sources that are left there are three sources that all oppose Keegan's statement.

  1. General Haig

    and eagerness to attack have not proved equal to the German art of defence will certainly make all of Germany very satisfied. This suggests that the British do not have anything to offer that is as good as the German defence making the German people happy because they are suggested better than the British.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    Especially when they had missed the chance to kill 330,000 British and French troops quickly. J.B Priestly helped spread the good news to the civilians and this is really what made Dunkirk unique in comparison to a simple retreat. However Dunkirk was still only a psychological victory, the British gained

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    In the second part of the Source the MPs threaten the men as we've heard. This would have been contributory to the slow puncture of zest. We are told that after the strong reprimand, the group "was split between excitement and the wanting to be home with their mothers."

  2. Source based questions and answers - The suffragettes.

    The caption on the poster shows how suffragists did not approve of this method, even though it was exaggerating publicity. To compare these sources I have to take into account that they are both different in the sense source C was made as propaganda by a man whereas source B is written by a women trying to convey a point.


    Our objective seems rather to kill as many Germans as possible with the least loss to ourselves . The tactics were simple, they were as follows:- * There would be a huge artillery bombardment, and mines would devastate German positions.

  2. How Far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    Private George Coppard tells us how the barbed wire was not cut properly to the pointy in which light could not shine through it. He describes how as many soldiers were dieing on the barbed wire as they were on the ground.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work