• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Field Marshall Haig - Source related study.

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework a} By studying source a it proves that Haig did not care about the lives of his men, you can tell this because he says that "the nation should be taught to bear losses", he also goes on to say that no matter how good his army is, the sacrifice of men's lives is definite. Haig must have said this because he knows that his plan will be unsuccessful and that many men's lives will be lost, and he wants to prepare the nation in advance, but then Haig goes on to say in source b that the attack has gone very well and the "Germans are surrendering freely". Haig is trying to keep morale high by telling the nation that everything is running like clockwork. Haig is now saying this to keep spirits up after what he said previously in source a). The purpose of source a) was to prepare the nation for the worst; he has already told everyone that many lives will be lost, so they cannot enquire afterwards. b) After reading both sources b and c, in my opinion he would trust the extract written by private George Coppard because unlike Haig he was actually at the front line and witnessed the attack for himself, although this mans experience might have ...read more.


then you have to look at who the source was written by- a British general, would he want to give a fellow general a bad name? So basically if this source was to be trusted then it would definitely be in Haigs favour. I don't think that source (f) can be proved wrong but at the same time I don't think that it is one hundred percent correct, as it may have been written by a biased person, sources (g) and (h) were written for a purpose, and this purpose was to get people to back Haig in what he did. e) I believe that sources (I) and (j) differ about the battle of the Somme because although both extracts were written by the same person, time periods are very important because one was written before the war and Lloyd George praises Haig for his actions saying that he has to congratulate him on the skills that his plan was laid. It was Lloyd Georges type that got Britain involved in the war so obviously he would do his up most to make it look like he is doing really well because it makes him look like the hero. ...read more.


Source (h) was written by a fellow British general he says that "Germanys spirit of resistance was broken" he says that Haigs army had complete confidence in him, how could they have so much confidence in him when he was never present at the time of an attack? I think that the general lied in order to give Haig a good name, the same kind of thing happened in source (I) which tells us that the war had turned in the British favour and how Lloyd George congratulates him on his skills shown, but then after the war had finished he said that he couldn't understand some of the decisions that Haig had taken. My conclusion is that Haig was not as bad as some people said, but he did make unnecessary moves which unfortunately cost the lives of hundreds of men, Haig should have spent more time planning his moves and not rushing into things without any thought. He should also have been present at the battlefields so that he would have been able to give out first hand advice, but Haig did do a lot of good for the British because good general or not he did win the war. Unfortunately Haig did lie and he did this to gain peoples respect if he hadn't of lied would he of earnt the respect he was given? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    However, it did mean that all of America's vast supplies of manpower, materials, money and technology were now available for the Allies to draw upon. Although American troops did not go into action until 1 June 1918, they were fresh and not weary of fighting like the other nations involved.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    He had pictured a classic cavalry breakthrough. German scout planes saw these guns being set up and knew Haig's repetitive tactics so the Germans knew what was coming and they prepared for it. They moved back in secret out of the range of the guns and dug trenches that were twelve foot deep ready for the inevitable bombardment.

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    While the Germans were perfecting their Storm-trooper tactics during the latter part of the war, Haig was still relying on mass bombardments and an infantry attack. Even so, by the end of the war he had accepted these new techniques, and was using them to great effect.

  2. General Haig

    It tells us that Lloyd George tried to shift the blame over to Haig. It also tells us about the pride he has for his people "The tale of these battles... is the story of the million who would rather die than call themselves cowards - even to themselves".

  1. Was General Haig a bad leader, source based

    However this source is not fairly reliable as at the time David Lloyd George was against what Haig was doing however there was no other person that David Lloyd George could keep in charge if he was to take Haig out.

  2. Was Field Marshall Haig the Butcher of the Somme

    This is quite clearly untrue as solid evidence suggests. The only reason why Haig could have been led to believe this was for the soldiers fear of being killed by him if they shared their views about him. Further on in the article, Wilson argues that Haig was "...fed misleading information by the head of intelligence..."

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study

    Source 15.J said that only machine guns came out, but rifles also broke out. In the British source 15.J, it said everything was working smoothly, but as we know, in source 15.H, the Germans were waiting for the British. 3.

  2. The Somme - source related study.

    and the book "1st day on the Somme" by Martin Middlebrook, state that a General/Brigadier General took the last parades and addressed the troops. Source D, however, is an eyewitness account of the first assault on the German lines in the battle, told by a German soldier.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work