• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Field Marshall Haig:The Butcher of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...


Assignment 2: History Coursework: Field Marshall Haig: The Butcher of the Somme A). Source A does not entirely prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men, however it does state that Haig was willing to sacrifice the lives of his men to win this battle and war. The source shows that Haig knew there were going to be heavy casualties, but how great did he think were the casualties he so expected were going to be. If he predicted that the casualties were going to be as high as they were after the Somme then why did go on with the battle? Surely he should have thought of an alternative plan. The source does not give that great an explanation as to why he didn't care about the lives of his men because from my own knowledge of the battle there were other plans that accompanied the attack that were not mentioned in the source that could not be revealed as the attack was to be a surprise on the German lines at Somme. In these plans Haig assumed hat the German lines would have been demolished e.g. the week long artillery was thought to destroy the machine guns posts at Somme. As historians know, the very first morning of the attack was when the British were suffering heavy casualties for they were badly unprepared because the British superior officers especially Haig was sure the enemy were dead. ...read more.


It is a bit obvious that Haig would not have wanted to just to move his drinks cabinet a few inches closer to Berlin. The British officers did not actually realise that the British were going to get "a good old British style thrashing" because they believed because of the artillery and bombardment that they would confidently defeat the German lines. Also Haig was not actually a Field Marshall until the end of the war. Source F was also written by British magazine. There was never actually any account of this being done. It was clearly made up by somebody who knew what happened at this kind of a briefing. There is no indication where it says where the source came from that it actually occurred so it was probably another way of making fun of the General and trying to prove that he was wrong and lazy. From my knowledge of war and the military, normal soldiers didn't expect a general to join I the fight because they knew how important they were to the army. D). Since source G is coming from the Germans, I think that with source H backing it up, they both prove source F wrong. Source F isn't entirely wrong because it was true that Haig's strategy was quite bad but G and H are right that the morale of the German troops and their confidence was decreasing slowly. ...read more.


It shows that he knew he had made a mistake by trying to cover it up in his speeches to the public. Sources like D and E could not be taken too seriously because it was only really about the opinion of other people, but they are relevant to historians in a way that you could get an impression on how annoyed people were about what happened in the war. Haig didn't sacrifice the lives the lives of his men for no reason, he truly believed that he could get through those German lines but he was not thinking about his soldiers at the time of his decision, he was thinking about himself. He had good plans but they were not good enough, e.g. the artillery was thought by everyone to smash the Germans to pieces but they did not know about the hidden German dugouts under ground. He was very desperate to get him and his men forward and penetrate the German lines and was prepared to throw whatever he had in a non-strategic sense at the Germans never realising that the cost would be so high. He was fighting a war of attrition. The battle was not for no reason because the outcome was a partial success due to the fact that the French had the pressure taken off them at Verdun. Maybe, even though there were so many deaths, this battle was actually the cause of Victory to the western powers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    Source 8 shows a war of attrition, where 'Dead and wounded were carried to the rear, and food and munitions were brought to the front'. This is much generalised, and is not far wrong. Michael Foreman also likens this process to 'clearing the table after dinner, ready for the generals' next game of soldiers'.

  2. was haig butcher of the somme

    This shows how little progress they are making and how heavily they are paying in the form of soldiers dying. Churchill's source then confirms the futility of the battle with, 'nor are we making for any point of military importance' and 'terrible killing of our troops, and we have not

  1. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    I find there is no reason for him to lie about the war, where as Haig if unaware of the reality of the front line and he wants to be seen as a strong leader, so therefore his opinion may be bias.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    must have been quite well organized and especially important if it boosted the morale of soldiers and civilians alike during the retreat.


    The second option was to make myself noticed, cause some trouble, and open my mouth at every opportunity. That didn't entice me; I figured I could end up losing my voice and getting myself into deeper trouble. I was then left with the third choice, my final decision, starving myself.

  2. The Somme - source related study.

    However, Haig had a motive to being biased. He had to try and prove to the British Government that the battle of the Somme was a success to keep his job. Therefore we question the reliability of this source. In his report, Haig ignores his battle plan and sidesteps to the lesser of the battle's achievements.

  1. Was Field Marshall Haig the Butcher of the Somme

    Every time the British soldiers carried out the order to attack and failed, Haig simply told them to do it again and again. This caused even more deaths than if he had changed his plans. General Rawlinson had many ideas for different attacks but general Haig didn't listen to them

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    Whereas previously they had put the majority of their troops in the front line, and only left a few in reserve for defence, now they were adopting the opposite scheme. Ludendorff's new doctrine was to withdraw as many troops as possible from the front line to protect them from British

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work