From a close study of E.M.Forster's "A Passage to India" and Julian Barnes' "A History of the World in 10 1/2 Chapters" examine the features which make up "a novel".

Authors Avatar

From a close study of E.M.Forster's "A Passage to India" and Julian Barnes' "A History of the World in 10 1/2 Chapters" examine the features which make up "a novel".

NOVEL?  How can you decipher the word novel?  The easy answer to that is, you cannot.  There is NO straight definition for the word novel, and everyone has his or her own opinion of what a novel is.  The novel is a relentlessly evolving genre, however the 20th Century has been deemed by critics to have experienced a series of rapid revolutions in the form of the novel.  With each 'revolution' there appears to be a new definition of the novel. This does however not imply there has been a discontinuity.  Walter Allen offered a modernist approach to the novel in 1954; he suggested "Every novelist gives us in his novel his own personal, idiosyncratic vision of the world…All aspects of a book (milieu, plot, characters, dialogue, style) condition and qualify one another".  Half a century later Malcolm Bradbury evaluated the novel in a post modernist context " a baggy monster a form of fictional prose narrative of a certain length that contains infinite variety, assimilates many different sub genres, draws on may origins, quite often to subvert them".  Different as these definitions may be they all succeed in falling within the same over arching genre. 'A Passage to India' is a result of the modernist school and was seen by critics and experimental, radical and avant-garde, this in comparison to what had come before.  'A Passage to India' is a straight example of a novel working within the reduced confines, with its narratives of truth, science, progress and reason.  Although the modernist movement may have been less conformist it did not allow the author the autonomy enjoyed by writers such as Julian Barnes in the post-modernist stage " A postmodernist work of art is arbitrary, eclectic, hybrid, de-centered, fluid, discontiuum, pastiche - like" (Eagleton)

Different though the novels are, there is a monumental similarity of the issues they cover, (despite being in different manners) which means that both are novels.  A novel is " a close imitation of man and manners; we see the very web and texture of society as it really exists" (Hazlitt) A homogeneous feature of both novels is the fact they draw onto diverse cultural and historical influences.  Forster dealt with Indian society, based upon two visits he made in 1912 and 1921.  He concentrates on India itself with the narrative being set 'out of time', with only the seasons mattering.  The novel itself has not been written as a political tract but as an examination of characters with official rein from the perspective of moral judgement.  Barnes moves away from the judgemental moralising style inherent within modernist work.  Although Barnes draws on more complex historical and social influences, Forster illustrates in detail the social and historical backdrop to his novel.  The first section of Barnes novel is based on Sir Walter Raleigh's "The History of the World", with the chapter 'Parenthesis' offering a rationale much the same as Raleigh's "The Preface".  The writers despite a gap of nearly four hundred years apart see history as fragments.  Raleigh uses a great array of digressions, while Barnes' whole book is viewed as an idiosyncratic digression.  Forster in contrast has a unitary voice whereas Barnes not only draws on society and history but also changes it.  Barnes chooses to write with this degree of fabulation but this is also how he views history.  " We make up a new story to cover the facts we don't know or can't accept we keep a few facts and spin a new story around them."

Join now!

The use of symbolism and structure is also a definite link between the two books.  Both are divided into sections, which function as an entity.  Forster's novel contains three sections which unite to form a whole, whilst Barnes book has been described by Swanson as "Sharing Certain properties with a book of short stories".  Barnes however states that the book "was conceived as a whole and executed as a whole".  The structure of Barnes work is good, beginning with Noah and the flood and finishing with a view, perhaps not the view of heaven though.  Although its certain methodological ...

This is a preview of the whole essay