• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

From this source and your own knowledge, explainthe reference to 'Fhrer power'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nazi Germany 1933-1945 7a) Study Source B From this source and your own knowledge, explain the reference to 'Fuhrer power' (line 5). In this source 'Fuhrer power' is supposed to mean a sort of 'God-like' power. The author of the source is trying to make it clear that Hitler was supreme leader of the Third Reich and that his power was unlimited and unchallenged. More importantly the author is trying to show that no one wanted to challenge Hitler's power because he was popular and that what he wanted was essentially what the people wanted anyway. From my own knowledge I know that Nazi propaganda made people believe that they like Hitler even if they didn't and this being just another piece of propaganda has the aim of making Hitler seem perfect. 'Fuhrer power' is basically a phrase used to describe the power that Hitler had as Fuhrer. He had unlimited power because he was head of state and head of government. b) Study Source A How useful is this source as evidence of the nature and extent of Hitler's appeal as Germany's leader in 1934? This source is a piece of Nazi propaganda and is therefore not going to show Hitler in a negative light. ...read more.

Middle

It states that due to Hitler's personal rule radicals were invited from below. It also talks about how Hitler's ruling made it easier for these people to get the things they want to be done, carried out, simply because they could make it seem that they were working towards the Fuhrer. This was very easy at the time because a lot of internal policies were not conducted by Hitler but by other Nazis below him who could make their wishes seem to be those of the Fuhrer's. 'Initiatives were taken without the dictator necessarily having to dictate.' Unlike the previous source we would not expect the author of this source to be biased towards any side because he was not emotionally attached or under pressure from society or anyone to influence the content of the source. Both sources confirm that Hitler's style of ruling made it easy for radicals and other less conservative members of the Nazi party to come into power and are therefore similar in that way. However source C makes it seem that the Nazi party were completely corrupt and that there was absolutely no sense of authority or leadership apart from Hitler. While source D makes it seem that Hitler simply wanted to have a system, which was completely different and unique from the Weimar days, and therefore via his personal power and authority he made sure that this was the case. ...read more.

Conclusion

This source was written by a silent opponent of Hitler after Hitler's death. Since it was written after Hitler's death and the Germany's loss in the war it is very unlikely to have been supportive of Hitler and the Nazis so it should be believed that this source was written with bias. Finally, Source D is by a modern historian so we would expect it to be unbiased and well researched. Ian Kershaw talks about how Hitler's method of dictatorship 'invited radical initiatives from below,' this is not necessarily a bad thing because these radicals were completely loyal to Hitler and therefore this emphasised his power and efficiency as dictator. Finally it says, 'initiatives were taken without the dictator necessarily having to dictate.' This shows Hitler's great strengths as a dictator because he can make decisions happen without even needing to do anything. My final conclusion on this is that Hitler's personal rule did not lead to a weak dictatorship but instead led to a strong leadership where everyone was always in competition with each other to please Hitler. Also I believe that having Hitler as a leader and dictator was very good at bringing the whole country together to work for a stronger Germany. Some of Hitler's methods may have seemed to be a bit weak but simply because he seemed to have complete loyalty from everyone made him and his methods successful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Where Did Power Lie in the Third Reich?

    This event is seen to be the most significant because he now had equivocal support of the army who saw their rivals weakened. This had such an effect that when Hindenburg died the army swore an oath of allegiance to the Fuhrer.

  2. adolf hitler

    He was only the fifty-fourth person to join the GWP. Hitler was immediately asked to join the executive committee and was later appointed the party's propaganda manager. In the next few weeks Hitler brought several members of his army into the party, including one of his commanding officers, Captain Ernst Roehm.

  1. Using your own knowledge and the sources, how do you think the Nazis consolidated ...

    Hitler realised he needed the support of the army on his side after the failed Munich Putsch in 1923, and this was possible by eliminating the SA and giving more power to the army, by placating them into supporting the regime.

  2. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    Also if Germans succeeded in being ignorant then this shows that they still support the Nazi's. The support and knowledge in Source I is much less obviously than in Source J. It lets the reader interpret this for themselves and gives hints such as the figures.

  1. How did Hitler come to power?

    to be done abiding all applicable laws so as not to be arrested. All these long-term causes are vital in Hitler's rise to power and without any of these long-term causes, the chances are he would not have become as successful as he was.

  2. Kristallnacht - source related study.

    When he describes the crowd as being "obviously horrified", it seems a bit of a strange reaction considering that if they were too shocked they may be arrested or taken away, so this may be inaccurate. Buffman himself says "the slightest sign of sympathy for the Jews from the public

  1. To What Extent Was Hitler a Totalitarian Dictator?

    Part of the training was to nurture a puppy from birth, and then when the final exam approached, candidates were given a gun to shoot the puppy with. If they did, they were in; if they didn't...they weren't. As I said in the previous section, the SS were led by Heinrich Himmler and were extremely loyal to Hitler.

  2. Kristallnacht - source related study

    So this source does agree with the statement that kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people. Source C was an account written by David Buffman who was the American consul in Leipzig. This is a primary source as he wrote the account at the time from what he himself had seen and also interviews he had carried out.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work