• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Gallipoli - source related study

Extracts from this document...


History: Gallipoli Assignment 1. How useful are the views of Anzac soldiers at Gallipoli suggested in Sources A, B and C. Explain your answer. Source A seems to tell us that the Anzac soldiers were unprofessional and lazy in their duties. The first cartoon portrays a soldier unprofessionally dressed, also the soldier is yawning, which gives me the impression that he is lazy. Furthermore at the top of the cartoon it says 'The Hopeless Dawn', this suggests that the artist believes the Anzac soldiers are unprofessional in their duties. At the bottom of the cartoon it says 'Standing Tall 4.30 am', even though these are the early hours of the morning this would not be acceptable for a soldier to do. Overall the first cartoon depicts the Anzac soldiers as 'Hopeless', hence I believe that according to this source the views of the Anzac soldiers at Gallipoli were not very useful. The cartoon could possibly have been biased or it could have been propaganda. The second cartoon is unclear about what it is representing, the cartoon shows an Anzac soldier smoking. ...read more.


Use the sources and your knowledge to explain your answer. Source D suggest that 'lightheartedly' attacks and the lack of attention paid to the people in charge were to blame on why the campaign failed. It also suggests that the intelligence and hard work of the Turks was also a factor that affected the failed campaign. The fact that the trenches became 'congested' was also a reason why the campaign failed according to source D. Also amateur decisions and disregarding decisions were what made the campaign fail. There is sufficient evidence to support the fact that poor planning was responsible for what went wrong at Gallipoli. Nevertheless the information was written some time after the campaign, so maybe a few important details were left out due to forgetfulness. Source E is very critical of the organisation of the army. It does not stop criticising the organisation of the soldiers, it also talks of the laziness of some of the army. It also says that the generals gave patchy instructions and a lot of the orders were left up to the minor soldiers to sort out. ...read more.


It must have correct information, as it would not feed its GCSE pupils lies. It talks of the total lack of organisation of the British army, which was due to Winston Churchill's errors of judgement. It also unearths some information that Britain were slightly arrogant and decided to underestimate their task, obviously they paid for this mistake, as the campaign failed. They used hardly any intelligence in the area prior to the attack, and they applied poorly trained tactics. I believe this source provides sufficient and correct evidence to support the interpretation that poor planning and Winston Churchill were responsible for what went wrong at Gallipoli. Source I shows us an overview of the poor planning of the Allied Expeditionary Forces. They have planned poorly, this may be due to the apathy of the generals/leaders or the failure of Winston Churchill to inflict discipline on his generals. Poor planning and arrogance are the main concerns, of why the campaign failed. In general there is more than enough sufficient evidence to suggest that poor planning and Winston Churchill were responsible for what went wrong at Gallipoli. Only one or two sources were in favour of Winston Churchill, which I believe were biased. Hence it is correct to penalize Winston Churchill and inapt planning for causing the failure of Gallipoli. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    This source does contradict Source F as it does focus on morale and the damage done to the army. I source may be expected to be making excuses for the Germans loosing the war, but I feel it dosen't do this.

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study

    I think it was being written, when he was fighting in the war at the Somme. Also, because it's a novel and is telling a story, it will be more dramatic, so things will be enthesised and exaggerated, For example, "They must go on.

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    As it is a diary entry, Hankey would have no need to lie to himself. There is however that chance of bias. Hankey is an important official at this time. He is "Secretary of the Committee of Imperial Defence and of the war council."

  2. The 1913 Derby - source related study.

    Many of the sources differ in opinion, I have found that sources A, B, D and F all point to Emily being a martyr, 3 out of these 4 sources have been written by suffragettes, one written by Emily herself, whom are going to be bias.

  1. Why was it Important that the Gallipoli Campaign should succeed?

    Therefore one of the reasons for the Gallipoli campaign was to relieve pressure on the western front and to boast the moral of those troops. It would boast their moral because it would show them that the enemy could be beaten.

  2. Votes for women - source related questions.

    being more from the upper classes (The conservative party was mainly a middle/upper class party). Having said this, the author might instead be opposing all female suffrage by showing the different suffrage groups as being divided though after finding the extra information this seems unlikely.

  1. The Derby 1913 - source related study.

    It also shows me that even after the accident, the race didn't stop and that the majority of the crowds are following the end of the race. Lastly I believe the fact that source C clearly shows the bend is of great importance, and as it is unclear in source

  2. Votes For Women - Source related study.

    In 1908 Campbell-Bannermann was replaced by Herbert Asquith as Prime Minister. He was another Liberal politician but was against giving women the vote, as he thought they would all vote Conservative and the Liberals would consequently lose power. This did not help the women's cause.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work