• Level: GCSE
  • Subject: History
  • Document length: 527 words

GCSE ESSAY- The Manchurian Dispute

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the League of Nations fail to act upon the Manchurian dispute? When Japan attacked the North Chinese province of Manchuria in 1931, the League did little to punish them for their act. The League acted weakly, using the Lytton Committee to buy themselves time. The Lytton Committee spent 11 months in Manchuria, gathering evidence on what had happened, and their only prescribed course of action was to criticise both Japan and China for the incident. The Japanese were resentful of the European powers from the treaty of Versailles, where they felt their demands for rewards were ignored, even though they were a victorious power. ...read more.

Middle

At this time the whole world was going through the Great Depression, and Britain and France were preoccupied with home affairs. They did not want to impose a trade embargo, partly because they needed to export their goods to help prop up their economies, and also because the USA, who were following an isolationist policy, had not got involved in the crisis, and would still trade with Japan, undermining any power the League might have had. Britain also had a large empire in the Far East, and the political machinations of the Japanese government over building an empire worried the British. They did not want to anger the Japanese, who may invade their colonies, from which they had gained economic superiority and a good reputation. ...read more.

Conclusion

Since trade embargoes would be ineffective, and an army could not be prepared, the League decided to leave the matter alone, their only action being the criticism of the Lytton Committee. In conclusion, most of the blame for lack of action falls upon Britain and France, who were simply not prepared to put themselves at risk. However, the isolationist policy of the USA was in direct contradiction with the League, and their plan to impose a trade embargo was undermined by the USA ignoring them and continuing to trade with Japan. This signals the dividedness and fallacy of the League, as well as showing how much the league had been weakened by not having the presence of America, and was therefore failing as a result. ?? ?? ?? ?? Edward Millett LSH BB ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    There was no question of who was going to win. One of the main reasons for this was that the league was at least seen to do the right thing in the Manchurian crisis as they condemned Japan for invading and although they didn't do anything about it they did, in the end, came to the right decision.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    Another reason why the Abyssinian crisis was a death blow to the league and the Manchurian crisis was not is because France and Britain could have at least done something to stop the Abyssinian crisis by closing the Suez Canal, they couldn't have done much to stop the Manchurian crisis

  1. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    A similar case had occurred after the battle of Eurymedon in 468 BC, when Athens had used the riches won after the battle to rebuild her city. It is possible that she may have been compensating herself for her losses during the earlier conflict with Sparta.

  2. AMR essay

    another dictator trying to take over the world, and the Soviets feared a powerful invader6. The Americans had a monopoly on the atomic weapons, and weren't sharing their secrets; this alarmed the Soviets and prompted them to make atomic weapons of their own.

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.