• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

General Douglas Haig

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GENERAL DOUGLAS HAIG Douglas Haig, a wealthy Scot and a good friend of George V was also a famous General who led Britain to Victory in the First World War. In the past 85 years historians have portrayed him in many different ways as being both good and bad. Sources C to L vary widely in support of the historian John Keegan's interpretation, which is 'General Haig was an efficient and highly skilled soldier who did much to lead Britain to victory in the First World War.' I will now examine and evaluate all the sources in order to draw a conclusion as to whether or not the above statement is correct. Having examined the first of these sources, source C; I noticed that it is one of the most balanced sources. The source begins by praising General Haig, referring to him as 'One of the Great Men of the Twentieth Century'. We also learn that the soldiers seemed satisfied with him as a leader - 'when the old soldiers were alive I never heard a word of criticism from them'. The writer of this source does accept that only now, through the passing of time, people are criticising him. 'In more recent time more pour scorn on my father'. ...read more.

Middle

With the French in the difficult situation they were currently in, it would have been quite unlikely that their co-operation with the British would have broken down, as without British help they would have had no real support to fall back on. Being an autobiographical source and the writer being asked to write it by Haig's family would suggest that the source might be biased and the writer given instructions as to what he should write. I form the impression that the extract is trying to justify some of the 'arguable mistakes' that Haig made. The two sources, which display the most un-supporting views of Haig as a military leader, are sources D and G. The poster in source D makes a mockery of the original poster, which, was used in the war as a very strong propaganda message to persuade people to join the British army in World War I. This poster was of John Kitchener with a caption that read 'Your Country Needs You'. The poster in the source would have, if it was displayed at the time of the war, convinced people not to join as the caption read 'Your Country Needs Me, like a hole in the head, which is what most of you are going to get.' ...read more.

Conclusion

Despite the video being slightly confusing at times, with many different historians speaking all with slightly different views, at the end of the video it was said that Haig acknowledged that there would be heavy casualties and that this was unavoidable. After a lot of debating one historian in particular says that true support for Haig will not be acknowledged until some fifty years to come but Haig should be given the credit he is due, which means that this source ultimately supports Keegan's interpretation. In conclusion, many of the sources that I have studied are against Haig as a military leader, more than that are for Haig and Support Keegan's statement. Despite this I do not believe the majority of these sources can be thought of as reliable as they are either biased or written for another purpose than to inform. Therefore they cannot be deemed useful. The most useful sources of all and the fairest to Haig, from what I already know, are sources K and L. These sources give a balanced and fair view of Haig and indicate that although he made some big mistakes he was well educated, highly trained and ultimately he did what needed to be done. I believe that Haig did the best that he could do under the circumstances and with what he had to hand so on balance, Keegan's interpretation is supported by the most useful and reliable sources. Declan Archer 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    The Germans were pro-defensive. They would not run towards the Allies with bayonets to get totally obliterated. Instead they sat back and let the Allies wear themselves down on their machine guns and artillery. They also set up barbed wire, through which soldiers would have to force their way through before facing the Germans.

  2. Was General Haig a bad leader, source based

    Overall from the collection of two sources I believe there is fairly enough evidence for both for and against Keegan's statement however there are only two sources. From the sources that are left there are three sources that all oppose Keegan's statement.

  1. My interpretation of General Haig is that he was a foolish leader and should ...

    They also had not been prepared or given a real understanding to what they would face. The French took advantage of the fact that the British were under control and went to fight at Verdun which left the British alone.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    Source 17 is taken from Churchill's memoirs, the very conversation he had with his Ministers 'There was a white glow, overpowering sublime, which ran through our Island'. This is a typical example of the way Churchill described Dunkirk at the time; these very words were used in a speech to millions as government propaganda.

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    They maintain that he could not possibly have known what was happening unless he actually saw it, and therefore condemn him for his lack of understanding about the situation. Others disagree, and say that he could not possibly have conducted the war from the front line, as he would have seen too small a part of the whole picture.

  2. How much were generals such as Douglas Haig to blame for the huge number ...

    He thought that a cavalry breakthrough after an initial artillery bombardment could be adapted to all battles. In an article he wrote "Aeroplanes and tanks are only accessories to the men and the horse, and I feel sure that as time goes on you will find just as much use

  1. General Haig

    It says that he thinks he was one of the greatest men in the twentieth century and not a callous, uncaring man when in fact he was a very humane man. He also says "When the old soldiers who fought in the war were alive, I never heard a word of criticism from them.

  2. Some people have the view that British generals like Haig were incompetent leaders. How ...

    In the source Terraine says that leaders like Haig ?rose to challenge after challenge? however leaders like Haig remained in the communication trenches whilst the privates fought the blood stained war, thus they didn?t rise to any challenge. Also between the war and 1980 many different interpretations have arisen yet

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work