• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

General Douglas Haig

Extracts from this document...


GENERAL DOUGLAS HAIG Douglas Haig, a wealthy Scot and a good friend of George V was also a famous General who led Britain to Victory in the First World War. In the past 85 years historians have portrayed him in many different ways as being both good and bad. Sources C to L vary widely in support of the historian John Keegan's interpretation, which is 'General Haig was an efficient and highly skilled soldier who did much to lead Britain to victory in the First World War.' I will now examine and evaluate all the sources in order to draw a conclusion as to whether or not the above statement is correct. Having examined the first of these sources, source C; I noticed that it is one of the most balanced sources. The source begins by praising General Haig, referring to him as 'One of the Great Men of the Twentieth Century'. We also learn that the soldiers seemed satisfied with him as a leader - 'when the old soldiers were alive I never heard a word of criticism from them'. The writer of this source does accept that only now, through the passing of time, people are criticising him. 'In more recent time more pour scorn on my father'. ...read more.


With the French in the difficult situation they were currently in, it would have been quite unlikely that their co-operation with the British would have broken down, as without British help they would have had no real support to fall back on. Being an autobiographical source and the writer being asked to write it by Haig's family would suggest that the source might be biased and the writer given instructions as to what he should write. I form the impression that the extract is trying to justify some of the 'arguable mistakes' that Haig made. The two sources, which display the most un-supporting views of Haig as a military leader, are sources D and G. The poster in source D makes a mockery of the original poster, which, was used in the war as a very strong propaganda message to persuade people to join the British army in World War I. This poster was of John Kitchener with a caption that read 'Your Country Needs You'. The poster in the source would have, if it was displayed at the time of the war, convinced people not to join as the caption read 'Your Country Needs Me, like a hole in the head, which is what most of you are going to get.' ...read more.


Despite the video being slightly confusing at times, with many different historians speaking all with slightly different views, at the end of the video it was said that Haig acknowledged that there would be heavy casualties and that this was unavoidable. After a lot of debating one historian in particular says that true support for Haig will not be acknowledged until some fifty years to come but Haig should be given the credit he is due, which means that this source ultimately supports Keegan's interpretation. In conclusion, many of the sources that I have studied are against Haig as a military leader, more than that are for Haig and Support Keegan's statement. Despite this I do not believe the majority of these sources can be thought of as reliable as they are either biased or written for another purpose than to inform. Therefore they cannot be deemed useful. The most useful sources of all and the fairest to Haig, from what I already know, are sources K and L. These sources give a balanced and fair view of Haig and indicate that although he made some big mistakes he was well educated, highly trained and ultimately he did what needed to be done. I believe that Haig did the best that he could do under the circumstances and with what he had to hand so on balance, Keegan's interpretation is supported by the most useful and reliable sources. Declan Archer 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    The Germans were pro-defensive. They would not run towards the Allies with bayonets to get totally obliterated. Instead they sat back and let the Allies wear themselves down on their machine guns and artillery. They also set up barbed wire, through which soldiers would have to force their way through before facing the Germans.

  2. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the ...

    achieve so little, partly because of the bad weather conditions which made movement extremely difficult." This source supports Lloyd George's view that Passchendaele was a senseless campaign still further. Many historians have also called Passchendaele a senseless campaign. Many blaming him for the needless slaughter of 750,000 British soldiers on the Western Front.

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    'Hitler and Stalin' is a book written by a famous historian-Allan Bullock. It explains the importance of Hitler's delay in stopping the B.E.F escaping, and how essential this escape was for Britain. If it wasn't for the halting of the Nazi tanks, I sincerely doubt that Britain would of organized

  2. Was General Haig a bad leader, source based

    It is a biography on whether Haig was right to press on with the Battle of Somme. The purpose of this source is for reader to be informed and educated about Haig. This source is quite unreliable, as Duff Cooper's job was to write biographies and therefore is paid for it.

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    However, they were soon forced to go back to work and accept the cuts. This event proved to the miners that, if they wanted their strikes to be successful in the future, they would need the support of the other trade unions, as happened in the General Strike five years later.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    Incredulous...the Germans mowed the attackers down, until three and a half hours later, the remnants staggered away...The Germans, as they watched the survivors leave, stopped firing in compassion. Their casualties had been nil." Haig should have realised that the same thing was likely to happen again.

  1. Causes of the General Strike

    15th April became known as `black Friday`. After three months on strike, the miners returned to work under the employer's terms. Black Friday was a major cause of the General strike because it meant the miners were more dissatisfied than ever, with lower wages and increased hours; they knew that action had to be taken.

  2. Was it his fault? These are the questions I am going to examine in ...

    The attack was set for 29th June and, for about three weeks before this; every available British gun was brought to the Front so that finally there was one gun for every seventeen yards of enemy front line. Artillery fire began 7 days before the Somme offensive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work