• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

General George Custer

Extracts from this document...


General George Custer The battle of the little big horn was fought on the 25th June 1876. General George Custer and his 7th cavalry consisting of about 225 soldiers attacked a Sioux camp housing 12,000 Indians. The result of the attack was that neither Custer nor any one of his soldiers was alive come the end of the battle. In order to find out to what extent Custer was to blame for the defeat at the little big horn, and to what extent he was the victim of circumstances outside his control, I will have to asses Custers previous battles and also Custers personal character. In the years leading up to the battle of the little big horn, Custer was involved in many military affairs, such as the civil war. When the civil war had ended Custer insisted that he be in the peace photograph although he had only played a little part in the civil war. In 1868 General's Sherman and Sheridan requested the services of Custer whom they had previously battled alongside in the civil war and knew that he was hot-headed, self confident, brave, skilful and prone to disobey orders. ...read more.


Custer was a very cunning man but also wanted to be known as a powerful man. The situation leading up to the battle of the little big horn was that the American government wanted to clear the Indians away from certain places into special designated places called 'reservations'. However, it seemed that wherever the government moved the Indians gold was discovered and the Indians were moved to a new reservation. Any Indian found outside these reservations would be captured returned or sometimes even killed. The Indians were not very happy with these circumstances as not only was there freedom taken away from them but so to were the buffalo as the reservations were away from the buffalo breeding grounds, which meant the government had to provide food for them. Not only did that cause friction between the white Americans and the Indians but also the way they both lived and respected things was so much different. The Indians didn't believe in growing food (farming) but thought they should only eat what nature gave to them such as, buffalo and plants. ...read more.


The only other alternative Custer had at this point was to stick to General Terry's original plan and go around the Wolf Mountains, up the Little Big Horn and use his cavalry to attack the Indians at the same time Terry and Gibbon were attacking. The best course of action would have been to keep all the troops together and either attack in numbers or send out scouts to find the exact number of Indians they were to face in battle. I think that Custer disobeyed orders and went into battle himself, as he wanted to be hailed as the best General ever to live. Many factors contributed to Custers defeat at the battle of the Little Big Horn, such as the number of soldiers that he was up against. Custer had about 225 men whereas there were 12,000 Indians. Another factor was that the Indians had revolving rifles whereas Custer had previously rejected such guns as he thought his army would demolish the Indians easily. I feel that General George Custer was a ruthless and ambitious man who risked both his men and himself in an attempt to win glory for him. Custer was also courageous, patriotic and overall an excellent military leader. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat at the battle of ...

    3 star(s)

    He was to protect travellers and miners from the Indians. Custer then rose to the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel. As time went on he gained recognition from the plenty successful attacks on Indian camps. Custer was now a successful, brave, heroic fighter that was invincible.

  2. 'Law and Order in the American West'

    They filled various roles such as: (a) farmers, lending a helping hand to their husbands in cultivating and settling on the plains, (b) cooks/housewives/mothers/daughters: cooking for their husbands/children/fathers respectively as they toiled away in mining towns, doing the housework and brining up children, (c)

  1. Free essay

    Custers responsibilty for teh defeat at Little Bighorn

    The number of Indians - did Custer know how many there were? One thing that Custer did not know about was the number of Indians there would be. If he had known in advance from the Indian Bureau (who were the only one who could have known how many Indians there were).

  2. The American West :General George Armstrong Custer 1839 – 1878

    He says that Custer did not care about his men "Hardships to his men were worthy of but little considerations", which is supported by Source K, "He was too hard on his men". He was driven on by his burning desire for promotion, fame and glory, "dim visions of a

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    So would offer the explanation that Custer was hard on his men so would have marched them into battle after a long ride. Also it is judged on the amount Indians that he killed, not the amount of warriors. Custer was very self confident, arrogant, big headed and disobedient enabling

  2. Writing the Situation of the Indians - 'Summer on the lakes' by Margaret Fuller.

    product of which was her first book-lenght work Summer on the Lakes, in 1843. But before centring our attention in the form in which the book was written or in a detailed and accurate study of the passages where the theme of Native American is present; we are going to

  1. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    If he tried to stop the overseer whipping me, he might be whipped as well or flogged or have part of his body cut off or even sold off or even executed but would not save me. In fact, I am grateful he did not do anything, I could not

  2. Using Livy, How Great a General was Hannibal?

    He would try to separate Rome from her allies because they provided 50% of the Roman army - over 35,000 Infantry and 3,500 Cavalry. He wanted to cause schisms in the Roman political system so he could break up Rome from the inside. This strategy would take Rome by surprise.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work