• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

General George Custer

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

General George Custer The battle of the little big horn was fought on the 25th June 1876. General George Custer and his 7th cavalry consisting of about 225 soldiers attacked a Sioux camp housing 12,000 Indians. The result of the attack was that neither Custer nor any one of his soldiers was alive come the end of the battle. In order to find out to what extent Custer was to blame for the defeat at the little big horn, and to what extent he was the victim of circumstances outside his control, I will have to asses Custers previous battles and also Custers personal character. In the years leading up to the battle of the little big horn, Custer was involved in many military affairs, such as the civil war. When the civil war had ended Custer insisted that he be in the peace photograph although he had only played a little part in the civil war. In 1868 General's Sherman and Sheridan requested the services of Custer whom they had previously battled alongside in the civil war and knew that he was hot-headed, self confident, brave, skilful and prone to disobey orders. ...read more.

Middle

Custer was a very cunning man but also wanted to be known as a powerful man. The situation leading up to the battle of the little big horn was that the American government wanted to clear the Indians away from certain places into special designated places called 'reservations'. However, it seemed that wherever the government moved the Indians gold was discovered and the Indians were moved to a new reservation. Any Indian found outside these reservations would be captured returned or sometimes even killed. The Indians were not very happy with these circumstances as not only was there freedom taken away from them but so to were the buffalo as the reservations were away from the buffalo breeding grounds, which meant the government had to provide food for them. Not only did that cause friction between the white Americans and the Indians but also the way they both lived and respected things was so much different. The Indians didn't believe in growing food (farming) but thought they should only eat what nature gave to them such as, buffalo and plants. ...read more.

Conclusion

The only other alternative Custer had at this point was to stick to General Terry's original plan and go around the Wolf Mountains, up the Little Big Horn and use his cavalry to attack the Indians at the same time Terry and Gibbon were attacking. The best course of action would have been to keep all the troops together and either attack in numbers or send out scouts to find the exact number of Indians they were to face in battle. I think that Custer disobeyed orders and went into battle himself, as he wanted to be hailed as the best General ever to live. Many factors contributed to Custers defeat at the battle of the Little Big Horn, such as the number of soldiers that he was up against. Custer had about 225 men whereas there were 12,000 Indians. Another factor was that the Indians had revolving rifles whereas Custer had previously rejected such guns as he thought his army would demolish the Indians easily. I feel that General George Custer was a ruthless and ambitious man who risked both his men and himself in an attempt to win glory for him. Custer was also courageous, patriotic and overall an excellent military leader. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat at the battle of ...

    3 star(s)

    He inspired his troops at the face of danger and was always at the front of the line leading his men. As his ego grew his attitude went up with it. Custer began to disobey orders, set double standards for him and his men and mistreated his men.

  2. 'Law and Order in the American West'

    the innocent and their activities may have been the first step to the integration of more efficient and reliable law enforcement in these towns. However their presence was only effective in the short term in the many frontier towns, which lacked reliable law enforcement.

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    "Brave to the point of idiocy" stated Tim Slessor from the video documentary. It is both positive and negative, as it is a contradiction with irony, because being a historian he would be looking at the facts, but many historians study the evidence and write about their views on it.

  2. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    She was too much a lover for her master to send away from the big house to work in the field or anywhere else with her big belly and at the same time, he did not want his wife to know his affair with my sister.

  1. Free essay

    Custers responsibilty for teh defeat at Little Bighorn

    But Custer wouldn't have known that the river was uncross able and that there was quick sand, so this was just an unlucky mistake. Attacking with tired men This was in a way Custer's fault, by attacking immediately after they had finished a log argues journey- which meant that all his men and horse were exhausted.

  2. General Custer Essay

    Shortly after graduating he failed in his duty as an officer to stop a fight between two cadets. He was court-marshalled but was saved from punishment because of the huge need for officers in the Civil War. During the civil war his bravery was valued by some officers and he was made a Brigadier-General.

  1. Using Livy, How Great a General was Hannibal?

    This is an amazing feat in itself. The main way Hannibal dealt with this problem of schisms in his army was unity of command. He left behind 7000 troops that he thought were unreliable and might have voiced discontent of his leadership as he had shown his leadership over and again and could not afford his orders being questioned.

  2. The American West :General George Armstrong Custer 1839 – 1878

    He was incredibly brave, he would charge when an enemy was sighted. 'Source D' shows that he was a showman, and always wanted to be at the center of attention, leading processions and being center stage when General Lee surrendered.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work