• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

General George Custer

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

General George Custer The battle of the little big horn was fought on the 25th June 1876. General George Custer and his 7th cavalry consisting of about 225 soldiers attacked a Sioux camp housing 12,000 Indians. The result of the attack was that neither Custer nor any one of his soldiers was alive come the end of the battle. In order to find out to what extent Custer was to blame for the defeat at the little big horn, and to what extent he was the victim of circumstances outside his control, I will have to asses Custers previous battles and also Custers personal character. In the years leading up to the battle of the little big horn, Custer was involved in many military affairs, such as the civil war. When the civil war had ended Custer insisted that he be in the peace photograph although he had only played a little part in the civil war. In 1868 General's Sherman and Sheridan requested the services of Custer whom they had previously battled alongside in the civil war and knew that he was hot-headed, self confident, brave, skilful and prone to disobey orders. ...read more.

Middle

Custer was a very cunning man but also wanted to be known as a powerful man. The situation leading up to the battle of the little big horn was that the American government wanted to clear the Indians away from certain places into special designated places called 'reservations'. However, it seemed that wherever the government moved the Indians gold was discovered and the Indians were moved to a new reservation. Any Indian found outside these reservations would be captured returned or sometimes even killed. The Indians were not very happy with these circumstances as not only was there freedom taken away from them but so to were the buffalo as the reservations were away from the buffalo breeding grounds, which meant the government had to provide food for them. Not only did that cause friction between the white Americans and the Indians but also the way they both lived and respected things was so much different. The Indians didn't believe in growing food (farming) but thought they should only eat what nature gave to them such as, buffalo and plants. ...read more.

Conclusion

The only other alternative Custer had at this point was to stick to General Terry's original plan and go around the Wolf Mountains, up the Little Big Horn and use his cavalry to attack the Indians at the same time Terry and Gibbon were attacking. The best course of action would have been to keep all the troops together and either attack in numbers or send out scouts to find the exact number of Indians they were to face in battle. I think that Custer disobeyed orders and went into battle himself, as he wanted to be hailed as the best General ever to live. Many factors contributed to Custers defeat at the battle of the Little Big Horn, such as the number of soldiers that he was up against. Custer had about 225 men whereas there were 12,000 Indians. Another factor was that the Indians had revolving rifles whereas Custer had previously rejected such guns as he thought his army would demolish the Indians easily. I feel that General George Custer was a ruthless and ambitious man who risked both his men and himself in an attempt to win glory for him. Custer was also courageous, patriotic and overall an excellent military leader. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat at the battle of ...

    3 star(s)

    He was to protect travellers and miners from the Indians. Custer then rose to the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel. As time went on he gained recognition from the plenty successful attacks on Indian camps. Custer was now a successful, brave, heroic fighter that was invincible.

  2. 'Law and Order in the American West'

    Source E, is an account of the actions of a powerful vigilance committee known as the Baldnobbers. 100 members reportedly broke into a county jail and kidnapped a two-brother gang of recognized outlaws. The Baldnobbers then lynched the brothers. The brothers had been serving a sentence for assaulting a shop owner.

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    us to argue that many aspects of the battle were his fault. If this is a true analogy, he would have ignored orders and done anything for as much glory as possible. But with these down sides, came incredible ambition, as he had always wanted to become a lawyer, causing him to also be bold and brave.

  2. Free essay

    Custers responsibilty for teh defeat at Little Bighorn

    But Custer wouldn't have known that the river was uncross able and that there was quick sand, so this was just an unlucky mistake. Attacking with tired men This was in a way Custer's fault, by attacking immediately after they had finished a log argues journey- which meant that all his men and horse were exhausted.

  1. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    Slaves working in the plantation lives near the field in small, dusty houses call slave quarters, one tiny house often shatter up to ten slaves. We sleep on the dirty, dusty floor, although it was not as terrible as the ship we were put in after our capture.

  2. General Custer Essay

    Then he went on to West Point Military Academy where he had a reputation for being lazy and untidy. He enjoyed playing practical jokes on fellow cadets at the Academy. At the end of his time there he was placed last in his class.

  1. Using Livy, How Great a General was Hannibal?

    Hannibal also took measures for the security of Spain and Africa, including taking troops from their homeland and placing them in another part of the Carthaginian Empire ensuring their loyalty to the Carthaginian army, rather than to their country. All of this shows good administration.

  2. The Battle of the Little Bighorn.

    that included killing many Indians, but only losing 6 of his own men. These victories had inflated Custer's ego even more and given him an obscene amount of confidence. This confidence was exactly what made Custer feel so sure that he would win at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work