• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

General Haig: Butcher or War Winner?

Extracts from this document...


General Haig: Butcher or War Winner? In this piece of writing I am going to compare sources 1 to 7 and see if they prove that General Haig did not care about the lives of his men. I will start by answering the question and then I will talk about each source, commenting on its good and bad points and how reliable the source is. Do decide how reliable a source is we need to look at who wrote it, when it was wrote and what the source was meant to do, for example it could be to entertain. I think that these seven sources are not enough to prove that Haig did not car about the lives of his men. Source 1 is a photograph of Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig; he is wearing military honours, showing that he was a knight and that he had fought in earlier wars. This picture is not very helpful to this particular question, but still I will try and explain it. A helpful thing it does have on is the fact that he is wearing military honours which tell us he had fought in earlier wars. This is helpful because we can tell that he had experience and that if he wasn't a good soldier and leader he would never have made it that far up the British ranks. ...read more.


The artillery had failed. Thousands of lives would be lost because the men could not break through the barbed wire and had no cutters with them. In other places the Germans concentrated all their firepower on where the wire was cut, knowing the British must come out that way.' Depending on which one you believe answers the question, one tells that Haig was a war winner, and one tells the opposite, he was a butcher. Although this extract may also be biased but in the other way, because the man who wrote it was bound to feel hatred towards the commanding offices for the war and battle its self. Source 4 people think is a very reliable source, I think it is probably reliable but I still think it would be biased becuse as I mentioned earlier, the soldiers would feel resentment towards the commanders. Also this was written years after the battle and with the effects of war, like shell sock, the man may not have got all the facts right. 'Hundreds of dead were strung out on the barbed wire like wreckage washed up on a high water mark. Quite as many died on the enemy wire as on the ground. It was clear that there were no gaps in the wire at the time of the attack. ...read more.


The final source, which is source 7, is another fictional piece of information. Although this one was from Punch Magazine in 1917. Obviously this is going to have fiction in it to make it fun for the readers to read, but I think that Punch tried to put the truth across in their cartoons to the British public which were left in the dark to the true horrors of the war, so I think we can use it as a reliable source. Although the source doesn't specifically talk about Haig, form it we can tell that, generally Generals did not care about the men under their command. Overall I think that we do not have enough sources to say whether General Haig did not care about his men, but I do think from my contextual knowledge that Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig did care about his men, he just didn't really put into action the things, which I believe, were right. I also think that people purposely forget the good things that he did at the Battle of the Somme, and I think they only concentrate on the number of the dead, and so people call him the Butcher of the Somme who did not care for his men, which I strongly disagree with. make it fun for the readers to read, but i ource 4 people think i r the war and battle its self. her way, because the man who wrote it was bound to feel hatred towards t ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    He then realises that he needs to change his tactics, which would eventually work with considerable gains. Haig was responsible for the 'defeat of the German army on the western front'. Source 13 is a tribute to the British army and to Haig, written by Marshal Foch.

  2. World war 1

    Haig now become under extreme pressure from the French to produce a diversion from Verdun. On 1st July 1916, Haig and Joffre planned a joint attack on the German lines near Bapaume. The action was designed to relieve some of the strain on the French at Verdun.

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    governmental mishandling of the war time economy for the strains on the economy, and not the naval blockade.

  2. Field Marshal Haig - source based answers.

    The private was actually at the front line and fighting, this makes it not too much more reliable than Haig's because he simply wrote what his officers reported to him. Although the interview was years after the battle, the private speaks of incidents we know happened for instance we know

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    This made more unions and workers unhappy and uneasy about their situation, making them more likely to want to strike. As a result, the unions were drawn together, and the Trades Union Congress (TUC), the umbrella body of all trade unions, created a General Council to organise and coordinate a large-scale strike if and when one were needed.

  2. Does Field Marshal Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher of the Somme?

    ' After destroying the German line, the Allied forces were to walk across no mans land, in a indestructible straight line, and seize the German trenches. Haig did question Rawlinson's 'straight line' plan, unsure that it would work, but did nothing about his uncertainties and allowed Rawlinson to continue with his plan.

  1. Was Field Marshal General Sir Douglas Haig a hero, or the butcher of the ...

    Nevertheless, the British plan of attack did not change. This makes Haig sound ignorant, however, Haig's intelligence sources have often been questioned. "The selection of leaders from pre-war professionals was likely to produce a rich crop of mediocrities. Put bluntly, the nobility and gentry used the army as a dumping

  2. Field Marshal Haig.

    flinging masses of men against positions far to strong to be carried by assault . Haig was out of touch , distant from the war and his men . After the war he wrote an article about the impact that the First World War had made on military tactics .

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work