• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Give an account of the three stages by which the state of Poland gradually disappeared from the map of Europe in the late 18th century.

Extracts from this document...


(a) Give an account of the three stages by which the state of Poland gradually disappeared from the map of Europe in the late 18th century. (b) To what extent did the disappearance of Poland as an independent state result From its internal political weaknesses? By 1795, Poland had completely disappeared from the Map of Europe. This happened in three stages known as the Partitions of Poland. The first partition was a result of a series of events. Due to internal conflicts in the country of Poland of the two main noble families, one of which would be elected and this very thing was what would cause the initial problem. Russia saw this as a chance to interfere with Polish issues. She needed influence in Poland as it was part of her policy, expanding westward. Catherine the Great, Czarina of Russia, supported a member of the Czartoryski family and with her help, their candidate, Stanislas Poniatowski was elected as Monarch. Through Poniatowski she tried to change Poland. ...read more.


Hence, the first partition of Poland took place in 1772. Russia took white Russia and the areas between the rivers of Dvina, Dnieper and Drusch. Austria took most of Red Russia and Galicia. Prussia took West Prussia and smaller areas, excluding Danzig. She benefited most from this war because her land joined her country geographically. She took land because of her good idea and Poland lost because she was seen as the root of all the troubles. As a result of this partition, King Stanislas decided that his country was in need of reform to prevent another partition. Most of his reforms were successful and even encouraged him to resist Catherine's influence over his country by ignoring her position as protector of laws and liberties. Poland also signed a defensive alliance with Prussia which was later broken when the new Austrian King wanted to befriend Prussia after terminating his Russian alliance. Despite this setback, Poland formed a Great Diet which continued to reform the country. ...read more.


His army grew and looked as if he would be able to beat the Russian oppression, as he thought France would assist him. They even managed to set up a provisional government in Warsaw. Their dream was shattered when Prussia allied with Russia and made plans for the third partition. Kosciuszko was jailed. Russia took the rest of Lithuania and Black Russia as well as Courland. Austria took the north of Galicia, which included Cracow. Prussia got the areas between Niemen and Vistulla, which included Warsaw. To say that Poland was partitioned as a result of internal weaknesses is partly true but it does not fully justify the motives behind the partitions. The fact that the Monarchy and government were corrupt meant that the army was unorganized and that Russia could easily interfere. However, Poland was also at the center of three big European countries' foreign ambitions and without natural boundaries to protect her, was an easy target for suppression. All these things worked against Poland and made Polish defense a very important ingredient to keeping the Polish Plum-cake together. Without these the country was quite easily in a position to collapse. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. To what extent was the unification of Prussia due to weaknesses of Austria?

    While her economy was in decline due to the costly war in Italy in 1856, she was feeling isolated and cornered internationally as well after her involvement in the Crimean War, costing her her friendship with Russia without obtaining that of Britain and France either.

  2. Why was Europe on the brink of change at the turn of the 20th ...

    Socialism threatened the balance of power as each country needs its people to believe in their leader, they also need the working class to be productive. Russia's working class lost faith in the Tsar after the Duma was dissolved and the promises made by the Tsar were broken.

  1. Why was Europe at the Brink of Change at the Turn of the Twentieth ...

    In 1828, Greece successful gained its independence from the Ottoman Empire, setting a precedent to other similar sized, often smaller nations, to seek their own freedom. 1896, also saw the inaugural Olympic Games. Foreign leaders and diplomats were keen to espouse the peaceful nature of the games however, the Frenchman

  2. The Long Fuse by Laurence Lafore - Chapter Three: The Europe of the Armed ...

    The Franco-Russian Alliance compelled the Germans to get ready for a two-front war. The Aspect of Germany It was not all Germany's fault, however, that it were portrayed as a villain. The press and patriotic politicians of Russia, France, and Great Britain made themselves sound great, so naturally, Germany was made the "bad guy".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work