• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Gladiatorial games were one the most popular events displayed in the great amphitheatres of Roman history. Senators held the games as a bribe of trying to get more votes in election times and popularity.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WHY DID PEOPLE LIKE AND DISLIKE THE GLADIATORIAL GAMES Gladiatorial games were one the most popular events displayed in the great amphitheatres of Roman history. Senators held the games as a bribe of trying to get more votes in election times and popularity. Amphitheatres were oval domes (sort of a similarity to football stadiums today). It was divided into three parts like the theatre, and could seat about 20,000 people. The main tow entrances to the arena were the north and south end. And there was a death gate where the dead were dragged out. Gladiators were slaves who had been bought by trainers because there were physically likely to make or be good fighters. They might have been soldiers who had been puniladitorialshed for crime, other criminals, and captives from foreign battles. Gladiators were probably the only slaves in Rome treated with respect by their master, crowed, and emperor. A successful gladiator received great acclaim; poets praised him, his portrait appeared on gems and vases, and patrician ladies pampered him. ...read more.

Middle

But in some other cases they were controversial remarks and issues against the likes of gladiatorial games. A lot of people loved the gore entertainment and others simply thought it was more of a death row situation put on hold until the fighter knows the outcomes, of not surviving. So for years as the games went on, philosophers, politicians and campaigns against gladiatorial games were at a struggle with this loved entertainment by city's citizen. Many spectators loved this mind blowing game and what excitement it held for them. In addition, some people were indeed so much into it; they would sometimes actually volunteer themselves to fight, risking their own lives no matter what the cost. Gladiatorial games became obsessive and praise worthy for years; it kind of felt as if the fighters were being worshipped more than gods were. Once the games had begun and the musical instruments started to play, the crowd felt pumped with joy and hate. ...read more.

Conclusion

But during then and the long years gladiatorial fighting went on, there also seemed to be controversial issues against these games. Some philosophers had made remarks saying that, killing a man charged of any crime to only entertain the crowds and emperor's amusement is wrong and stupid. It's a complete was of time instead having the criminal executed properly or having a proper trial to find whether if he is really guilty or not for his actions. It would just lead the crowd into thoughts of more violence and crime doing than it would if these games weren't put on at all. Another remark said by some citizens of the city was that, more people should be more concentrated on exercising than spending their whole day watching the gladiatorial games. So in the world of gladiatorial fighting, those who had survived were indeed the most luckiest and richest. But those who had perished in front of thousands of people were no more to be seen or heard of. Farai Marimbe AMDG Classical Civilization 23/4/02 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Why was the Roman Army so Successful? Rome was one ...

    The cavalry was placed at the sides to make it easy for them to get out and start the initial attack. The auxiliaries were in front of the cavalry on the sides. This was because they were the least important of the army, and that they could kill more people

  2. Does Hegel's Perception of the World History Mean More Than Just a Popular Quotation?

    But even then the study of history concentrates on the study of nations and not the individual."6 Furthermore, Hegel's conclusion that "The History of the world is none other than the progress of the consciousness of Freedom; a progress whose development according to the necessity of its nature it is

  1. GCSE History Coursework: How were the various groups of people affected by events during ...

    Contradicting this, the British public would have felt vindication due to the fact that the Argentine's declared war on Britain; making them feel a sense of blamelessness and perhaps shifting the blame to the Argentines. Source 3, an article from 'The Sun' newspaper gives insight into the feelings of the British public, with the headline, 'Gotcha'.

  2. To what extent is it fair to conclude that Palmerston(TM)s foreign policy one long ...

    This not only enraged the Hungarians but also the Queen who demanded that Palmerston follow up with a full apology. Palmerston did respond but the apology was far from what the Queen and the Hungarians expected. This episode seriously damaged Anglo-Hungarian relations for years to come.

  1. Evaluate the arguments for and against oral history as an historical method.

    much like poetry in that one message carried by Romanticism is that the way in which we sense the world, or interpret our enviroment, is activly created in the individuals imagination. This being a perpetual cycle until the day we die, the interview procedure and method of using taperecorders that

  2. How Were The Roman Army Superior In Weaponry, Armour And Tactics To The Celts?

    I will now explain this under the Armour section. ARMOUR Without a relationship and balance between armour and tactics armies can often become very vulnerable. Some armies compensate less armour for speed and maneuverability so I will now compare the Celts and Romans on this. It is under the heading armour that huge differences in thinking can be seen between Celts and Romans.

  1. Analyse various representations of Arthur, from the earliest times to recent scholarship.

    Apart from the obvious Christian influence Nennius obtained from his relationship with Eludguys12, the simple fact that Nennius wrote during the 8th Century is evidence of his Christian bias. This is because when Nennius was around, all literature was written by Christian Monks13.

  2. The events that occurred in Derry on 30th January 1972 became known as 'Bloody ...

    As a contrast to Source A where the writer states that the information is only a partial extract and therefore not the full report. Therefore if a person who had a neutral view upon the events of Bloody Sunday happened to have embarked upon this article then this would considerably change the readers view upon the events of Bloody Sunday.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work