• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Gladiatorial games were one the most popular events displayed in the great amphitheatres of Roman history. Senators held the games as a bribe of trying to get more votes in election times and popularity.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WHY DID PEOPLE LIKE AND DISLIKE THE GLADIATORIAL GAMES Gladiatorial games were one the most popular events displayed in the great amphitheatres of Roman history. Senators held the games as a bribe of trying to get more votes in election times and popularity. Amphitheatres were oval domes (sort of a similarity to football stadiums today). It was divided into three parts like the theatre, and could seat about 20,000 people. The main tow entrances to the arena were the north and south end. And there was a death gate where the dead were dragged out. Gladiators were slaves who had been bought by trainers because there were physically likely to make or be good fighters. They might have been soldiers who had been puniladitorialshed for crime, other criminals, and captives from foreign battles. Gladiators were probably the only slaves in Rome treated with respect by their master, crowed, and emperor. A successful gladiator received great acclaim; poets praised him, his portrait appeared on gems and vases, and patrician ladies pampered him. ...read more.

Middle

But in some other cases they were controversial remarks and issues against the likes of gladiatorial games. A lot of people loved the gore entertainment and others simply thought it was more of a death row situation put on hold until the fighter knows the outcomes, of not surviving. So for years as the games went on, philosophers, politicians and campaigns against gladiatorial games were at a struggle with this loved entertainment by city's citizen. Many spectators loved this mind blowing game and what excitement it held for them. In addition, some people were indeed so much into it; they would sometimes actually volunteer themselves to fight, risking their own lives no matter what the cost. Gladiatorial games became obsessive and praise worthy for years; it kind of felt as if the fighters were being worshipped more than gods were. Once the games had begun and the musical instruments started to play, the crowd felt pumped with joy and hate. ...read more.

Conclusion

But during then and the long years gladiatorial fighting went on, there also seemed to be controversial issues against these games. Some philosophers had made remarks saying that, killing a man charged of any crime to only entertain the crowds and emperor's amusement is wrong and stupid. It's a complete was of time instead having the criminal executed properly or having a proper trial to find whether if he is really guilty or not for his actions. It would just lead the crowd into thoughts of more violence and crime doing than it would if these games weren't put on at all. Another remark said by some citizens of the city was that, more people should be more concentrated on exercising than spending their whole day watching the gladiatorial games. So in the world of gladiatorial fighting, those who had survived were indeed the most luckiest and richest. But those who had perished in front of thousands of people were no more to be seen or heard of. Farai Marimbe AMDG Classical Civilization 23/4/02 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Why was the Roman Army so Successful? Rome was one ...

    The cavalry was placed at the sides to make it easy for them to get out and start the initial attack. The auxiliaries were in front of the cavalry on the sides. This was because they were the least important of the army, and that they could kill more people

  2. Evaluate the arguments for and against oral history as an historical method.

    (Huggins, R, J 1994 p.1) Following this the usage of the oral history method is permitable as she has declared that she can only say what she holds to be true, in that she is not claiming her opinion to be universal.

  1. How Were The Roman Army Superior In Weaponry, Armour And Tactics To The Celts?

    This meant that although the Celts could run around freely they had little protection once their shields were destroyed by Pilums and were easy pickings for the skilled Romans and their deadly weapons. In comparison the Roman armour was far superior because most of their bodies were covered without making

  2. GCSE History Coursework: How were the various groups of people affected by events during ...

    Therefore, the events prior to it being taken and after are unknown. Another reason for its unreliability is the fact that the Argentines took the photo, meaning it could have been staged and used as propaganda. One of the major occurrences of the Falklands War was the sinking of the Belgrano.

  1. Using Livy, How Great a General was Hannibal?

    He then got his best men to choose 2000 men. He did this so they would know the importance of their job. They were closely united - they had put their trust in each other. They were told to lie in wait for the Romans.

  2. To what extent is it fair to conclude that Palmerston(TM)s foreign policy one long ...

    Britain also wanted South American land to enhance their huge empire and to aid the trade situation around the area. He also risks war with the Portuguese over his involvement in the Donna Maria throne claim. Donna Maria was the rightful Queen but her uncle had seized power.

  1. What Factors Led to a Roman Emperor

    Being so closely related to the gods in life logically implies that after death one would be 'welcomed' into the heavens. These cults can provide great pressure in order to secure deification for an emperor; nevertheless they themselves rely on the virtues of the emperor.

  2. Does Hegel's Perception of the World History Mean More Than Just a Popular Quotation?

    But even then the study of history concentrates on the study of nations and not the individual."6 Furthermore, Hegel's conclusion that "The History of the world is none other than the progress of the consciousness of Freedom; a progress whose development according to the necessity of its nature it is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work