• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haber Essay

Extracts from this document...


"Is it the duty of scientists in wartime, to do everything in their power to defend their country?" Discuss. Science is a provocative discipline based on theories and assumptions, and verified through experiments, and continuously developed through new evidence. Imagine a day without technology, imagine your day without any sort of comfort, and imagine time slowed down, where you have nothing to rely on, science demolishes those nightmares. Science has helped satisfy our need for comfort, convenience and efficiency. 500 years ago, Columbus discovered the New World with a sailboat, across the treacherous Atlantic Ocean through months of ordeal, looking for India; 500 years later, we have developed the technology to travel to the moon in the matter of days. Science has brought great efficiency to the world, however sometimes politicians' quest for power, can tarnish the images upheld by scientists worldwide. Should technology be used for the good, or for power? Should the brilliant mind of scientists be used in warfare, for the good of the country, as the duty of the scientist? The responses to these questions are highly controversial. Firstly, some people argue that the scientists are citizens, just like the normal people who live in that country, therefore it is there duty to protect their country in any means they can. During times of peace, scientists' theories and inventions help improve the quality of life. ...read more.


In the same time huge amount of heat can burn down anything along its shockwave. After the explosion, the radioactive fallouts drift along with the wind, and can cause radioactive poisoning to humans, for a period of few months. The devastating effects of the bomb were witnessed during WWII. After Albert Einstein sent a letter warning president Roosevelt about the chain reaction which can subsequently lead up to the atomic bomb, Roosevelt quickly started the Manhattan Project. The sole purpose of this project was to build a bomb sooner than Hitler. With the available nuclear technology from Fermi, and developed by American scientist J. Robert Oppenheimer, the chief of the Manhattan Project, the nuclear reactor was slowly transformed into a nuclear bomb. The problem with developing the bomb was that the atomic bomb was the production of a large amount of "enriched" uranium to sustain a chain reaction. At the time, uranium-235 was very hard to extract. To make the task even more difficult, the useful U-235 and nearly useless U-238 are isotopes, nearly identical in their chemical makeup. No ordinary chemical extraction method could separate them; only mechanical methods could work. Over 2 billion dollars was spent for the project to be a success. On August 6th and 9th, 1945, the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by the first atomic bombs used in warfare. ...read more.


Harsh? Well that's the spoils of war. Scientists have the choice to agree, or to not agree on whether they want to create a weapon. They also have the choice of creating a weapon that can benefit mankind or one that harms it. Saying that the nuclear bomb is a bad creation would be absurd, if it wasn't for the bomb the affects of WWII would be more catastrophic than ever; however, it wasn't the best creation either. Scientists have created many other great things in the field of weaponry. some examples are the Kevlar vest and the taser. With these inventions soldiers benefit from not being killed when gotten shot in the battle field. Those inventions define a scientists actions and what he or she believes in. In conclusion I think that scientist should be able to help their country, and defend the soldiers that fight for them. However, I disagree with creating weaponry that can kill thousands of innocent people. If the technology is used to protect, not to kill, that in my opinion is a great invention. In this day and age technology can mean the difference between life and death; having the greatest technology in weaponry can enable great protection for the soldiers fighting the war on your countries side, and can mean death for the other. It is for this very reason I think that science should be used for efficiency and the protection of the people, and not for mass murder, let the soldiers do the killing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. WW1 - technology and trench warfare.

    Until the arrival of the British 7th Division they were the only troops between the German army and the Channel ports. The Germans did actually manage to enter Ypres and a few local villages, before being forced back onto the ridges around Ypres, by the arrived of the British 7th Division.

  2. The Atomic Bombings of Japan q.5

    or a device to stop the Japanese in their tracks, but as a horrible personal experience that has haunted them for all their lives. These two people, are still very bitter and their personal experience of the bomb makes them very much oppose Truman's view.

  1. Submarines essay

    The submarine was undiscovered for more than a century. Garrets design was not proven to the navy but he then designed a new one that did get attention. Named the Nordenfelt, two of them were built. Turkey bought the first one and awarded Garrett with a title of Lord.

  2. Sumer project

    You can stay for up to 14 nights for a very good price. Included in the price is either a continental or full English breakfast each morning. Passion flower restaurant and hotel, Kish The passion flower hotel is very beautiful and has passion flowers growing all around it, this explains its name.

  1. Sourced based essay on the Mormons

    western towns, but do have their problems; source D is an artist's impression of a bank raid. Source E is a notice left by the vigilantes use a lynch death and source F is a description of Virginia City by 'journalist', Mark Twain.

  2. The Impacts of crusades on European and Middle Eastern Historical development.

    Oldenbourg may have biases based on living in France, a person with French loyalty would want to see the history of France showed in good light. As far as the Children's Crusade not really being children at all, but in fact the poor, that seems like that should have

  1. Knightly Warfare. The knights primary and considered most well known weapon was the ...

    Weapons 4). To counter the switch to stronger and larger armors, Knights had to use long swords more as a thrusting weapon against opponents in plate armor, requiring a more acute point and rigid blade (Med. Weapons 4). The blade was not the only thing to change over time with the long sword.

  2. Describing Advances in Weaponry in WW2.

    This one invention caused all other countries to start developing their own bombs after realising the devastation is can cause and how efficient it is as a weapon. Weaponry in this small time period has advanced and has become better due to great inventions and ideas.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work